We get a lot of books for review here at Slashdot. Most are sent out
to users on our reviewer list within a few weeks. Others become part
of an impressive wall of books on my desk before they find a home.
There are a choice few however that are doomed to never see the inside
of a Fedex box. This is mostly due to the complete and utter
stupidity or absurdness of their subject matter. I've decided to give
these failed intellectual endeavors a chance and explore just how big
a waste of time a book can be. We start scraping the bottom of the
barrel with a little number written by Paul Davidson called, The
Lost Blogs. Read below to find out just how bad it got.
I used to work at a restaurant in college. After I was there for a
year it was my job to help train new employees. One evening they had
me train a nice young girl on the dessert station. The dessert
station was one of the easiest places to work all you did was bake and
slice pies and make the occasional ice cream sundae. An order for a
hot fudge sundae came through the ticket machine so I got out a bowl
and got her started. We used hot fudge packets that had to be warmed
up in the microwave before being squeezed out onto the top of the ice
cream. I told my new young trainee that the hot fudge needed a thirty
second bath of microwaves and to get me when it was done and I'd show
her how to pipe on the whip cream all fancy like. After a few minutes
she came up to me and said that the ice cream had all melted, so she
tried it a second time with the same melting results. I looked over
both bowls of liquid ice cream and asked her how they melted so fast?
I asked her to make another one while I watched to see what she was
doing wrong. She scooped out the ice cream, opened up a packet of
fudge squeezed it out and put the whole bowl into the microwave. I
didn't know what to say. She microwaved ice cream six times that night
while I watched, not once did it occur to her that ice cream would
melt in a microwave. I comped the mans bill for the sundae he never
got and had a good portion of the restaurant employees gathered to
see if the trainee would ever solve the melting mystery. She never
did and until I opened the first page of The Lost Blogs the six
sundaes in the microwave was the stupidest thing I have ever seen.
The book starts off with a rambling two page acknowledgments section
that drunkenly wanders from subjects like the South Beach diet to
petty theft. It pauses to discuss the difference between Abe Vigoda
and Bea Arthur and finally embarrasses Paul's family by forever linking
them in ink with this sham of a book. This section does serve a
valuable purpose however. Anyone with any level of discernment would
be so turned off by it's incoherent nature that they would be saved
the agony of reading The Lost Blogs. Discernment is not a luxury
I had, so it was with much regret that I read on.
The premise behind The Lost Blogs, like talking fruit and a
submarine for babies, seems like a good idea until you see it in
action. Quoting the back of the book, "What if the most famous,
brilliant, obsessive, dumb and evil people throughout history had
blogs? Wonder how Charles Lindbergh kept busy during his transatlantic
fight? Wonder how Napoleon could possibly have reached the keyboard?
In The Lost Blogs, you'll read the intimate weblogs of 175 iconic
historical figures writing about their stupid pets, shaving rituals
primate romances and plans for world domination-just like any other
blogger...maybe even you!"
What it delivers is 271 pages of nonsense that is reminiscent of an
assignment in your high school creative writing class. Many of the
blogs are a few hundred words or less, which was fine with me since
most of them are historically inaccurate. Alexander The Great's blog
talks about how great his blog is. Joseph Stalin's blog talks about
how he's going to purge his blog of all links. I assume because he
purged his country of ethnic minorities, political opponents and other
undesirables, killing millions. Hilarious! Samuel Morse just has five
paragraphs of dots and dashes. Noah has a list of animals he still
needs. Louis Pasteur talks about how germy his keyboard is. Herman
Melville is obsessed with fighting a giant black cockroach that lives
in his toilet (alright I kind of like that one). Fifty-one out of the
first 100 words in the Howard Hughes blog are urine. That's over half
urine! I took this as a metaphor for the whole book. Lastly, Jim
Morrison
posts the lyrics to a new song he's working on called, Light the
Fire
You know I've opened up the flume
and thrown inside a rubber tire
so can you please just follow through
and finally, please, start the fire
Come on baby, light the fire
Come on baby, light the fire
but please don't light the house on fire.
I know that somewhere Weird Al is crying. I could go on and on but
you get the idea.
It seems to me that anyone with nothing to do, I mean absolutely
nothing, could sit down with a few beers, a note pad and Wikipedia and
crank out something like The Lost blogs. Lets pray that they
don't. Almost every historical figure in the book has surviving
writings that you can read. Some have a huge amount that you can sift
through. So in addition to being inaccurate and unamusing The Lost
Blogs is also redundant. My favorite part of this book is
that I finished it and never have to open it again. The Lost
Blogs is an exercise in mental masturbation that doesn't have the
decency to let you finish. It is the bottom of the barrel.
Goggles &c (Score:5, Insightful)
Really? We're supposed to read a book review in white-on-teal?
Re:Goggles &c (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Goggles &c (Score:5, Informative)
White on light green is even harder to read.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Goggles &c (Score:5, Informative)
Don't worry. I read the review for you. The summary is "Don't read the book".
Re:Goggles &c (Score:5, Funny)
View->Page Style->No Style
I'm pretty sure they've already got that one licked.
-G
What gives? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What gives? (Score:5, Insightful)
Agreed. I was much happier when this stuff was hidden in a dark corner of Slashdot Labs.
If they'd pull idle off the front page and off the newsfeed I'd even be willing to use all of those mod points responsibly instead of throwing them around randomly.
Re:What gives? (Score:4, Informative)
You can do this yourself.
Click on 'Help & Preferences' in the top bar.
Click on 'Sections' under 'Index' in the right column.
Select none, i.e. the red circle with a slash through it, for 'Idle'.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Maybe if the front page Idle stories get enough bad comments and not enough views, Idle can go back to it's corner.
Re:What gives? (Score:5, Insightful)
The big problem with idle so far for me is that there is no scope for comments. What are we supposed to say about this story, for example?
"Thanks for your funny anecdote and warning us not to read this book none of us would ever have seen anyway!" /. is famed for the quality of the discussion, and so far the promoted idle stories aren't really providing any possibility for that. Heck, the summary/story does not even go so far as to pose a question, and defines the book in question as the bottom of the barrel, so what remains?
hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Funny, I felt the same way about this review.
Editors? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Editors? (Score:4, Funny)
But who will edit the editors' editors?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Editors? (Score:4, Funny)
A cookie for the appropriate Star Trek episode on this...
Re:Editors? (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe "No that's not what I meant, just heat the packet not everything."? You're not very good at training people are you?
Re:Editors? (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, if he was training her to have low self-esteem when she realizes someone she trusts is letting her humiliate herself over and over, then he's great.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Her brain may have been devoted just then to "Why the *$%@ do they microwave the ice cream? How does this even work for them? Why are they all standing around looking at me instead of telling me what I'm doing wrong?"
Re:Editors? (Score:4, Insightful)
Bottom of the Barrel Site Design (Score:3, Insightful)
White text on green background make eyes bleed.
The book sounds like something that could work if done right, it was just hobbled by bad implementation. That old Darth Side [blogspot.com] blog comes to mind as a good way to do essentially the same idea.
You should have made the sunday yourself (Score:4, Insightful)
That poor customer never got his sunday just so you could watch the trainee fail six times? Six? Why?
Re:You should have made the sunday yourself (Score:5, Funny)
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday...
Stand by for blasphemy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Stand by for blasphemy (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't especially mind the white on teal either. The painful part is the contrast when you scroll down to the comments section and it suddenly switches to black on white.
Please keep it off the frontpage (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Please keep it off the frontpage (Score:5, Informative)
Help & Preferences -> Sections
"You have the ability to choose how much or how little content you want to see from each section. Further, you have the ability to choose if you want to view each type of article in 'Full Text' or 'Abbreviated' format."
Idle -> Never
did you fire her? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:did you fire her? (Score:4, Insightful)
Sometimes people are stupid. You solve this by education.
Bad example (Score:5, Insightful)
What's dumber, a rookie ruining ice cream six times or you watching it happen? I'm going with the latter. Did the owner know you were in the habit of letting employees flush his profits?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Having everyone gather around to mock one employee is a classic team-building exercise, he saved the restaurant a bundle on training doing that himself.
Good idea, poorly done (Score:2)
A good expample, now being distributed by RSS is George Orwell's journal. [wordpress.com] Admittedly the content posted thus far is at least as lame as many of those "three months then abandoned" personal blogs, but still it's cool.
Greasemonkey (Score:2)
Does anyone have a greasemonkey fix for this visual insanity?
Oh, ooohhh. (Score:4, Funny)
Ahhhh, yeeeahh. Um, well, that's basically sums up my entire posting history here on Slashdot. Come to think of it, I don't think I'm alone on this one.
The bottom of the barrel reviews itself (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The bottom of the barrel reviews itself (Score:4, Informative)
Not only that, but he even "had a good portion of the restaurant employees gathered to see if the trainee would ever solve the melting mystery". Not only did he do a bad job of training her, he went out of his way to deliberately humiliate the poor lass.
To top it off he did it to what he describes as a "nice young girl", which makes me wonder how he treats people that aren't nice and young. In short, samzenpus just outed himself as a first-class douche bag.
I know the feeling... (Score:3, Funny)
new tag: pleasestop (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not sure what the etiquette is for this, but I'd like to propose a new tag for these idle articles that hit the front page:
pleasestop
I, for one, will be tagging all future idle articles in this manner.
-G
a submarine for babies (Score:5, Funny)
Two things wrong with this statement
1. It does NOT sound like a good idea and shouldn't sound like a good idea at any point.
2. You've seen one in action?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
More edits (Score:5, Informative)
Now....
"a thirty second bath" should be "a thirty-second bath"
"fancy like" should be "fancy-like"
"the mans bill" should be "the man's bill"
"two page acknowledgments section" should be "two-page acknowledgments section"
"by it's incoherent nature" should be "by its incoherent nature"
That's enough. I'm bored. Let me just add that the Morse and Hughes entries in the book sound hilarious.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
William Safire's Rules for Writers:
Has it ever occurred to you... (Score:5, Insightful)
so (Score:5, Insightful)
She never did
And thus you utterly FAILED in your training duties. And heaped ridicule upon someone who did you no wrong or harm.
Argh! My eyes! (Score:3, Insightful)
Use punctuation or form better sentences. This really hurt to read.
Because of articles like this. (Score:4, Insightful)
Samzenpus blog (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't want this idle.slashdot.org crap in the regular RSS feed as if it was an actual story.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)