World's Fastest Net Link 'Used To Dry Laundry'
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Monday March 31, @09:40AM
from the it-gets-pretty-hot-in-there dept.
praps writes
"Last summer a 75-year-old woman from central Sweden became the envy of the IT world with her scorching 40Gbps internet connection. 1,500 simultaneous HDTV channels or a whole high definition DVD downloaded in two seconds were hers for the taking. Now Sigbritt Löthberg could soon be treated to an incredible 100 Gbps link — but it may not be put to great use. According to the head of the ultra-fast fiber connection project, Sigbritt mostly used the gear 'to dry her laundry.'"
First Post ? (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:First Post ? (Score:5, Insightful)
I really didn't even know this part of the site existed, or at least I didn't know it existed in this state. It is horrible.
Who is the retarded monkey responsible for this crap? Surely this has to be a mistake. It looks like the bastard child of the anything that wants to die and anyone stupid enough to join it. It this concept of "no news" being news and page layout that can't even render the same in different browsers (FF, IE6, and old mozilla)continues, I think a lot of people will simply not come around. I would probably be one of them but I suspect that doesn't matter much.
Reply to This
Parent
Euphemism (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
bandwidth (Score:5, Insightful)
I've never owned a space station, but I imagine if I suddenly came into control of one, I wouldn't get it put to as much use as someone with a clue.
Reply to This
Also (Score:5, Informative)
1) Can she even get that kind of speed? I mean yes, she's got a big ass link. Ok, that's great. Does her ISP have the necessary upstream to support that? It is much easier to have a single connection running at a given speed than it is to have connections at that speed supported by the necessary upstream to the Internet to make them useful.
2) Even if she does, that is way past the point of it mattering. There just isn't enough things out there that need that kind of bandwidth. You discover that at this point, even 10mbit is really damn fast for normal usage like web surfing (including video) e-mail and so on. It is only if you download large things that it becomes much of an issue. 100mbit is really fast for anything. At work I've downloaded a Linux DVD in like 7 minutes. Really, that is to the point where extra speed wouldn't make a ton of difference. In this case, we are talking speed in excess of what a harddrive can handle.
3) There just isn't much, if anything, on the net that is going to have the kind of upstream to make any real use of that. Even if you are doing a ton of things at one, you'll be hard pressed to find enough fat pipes to start to fill up a link that large. There are backbones that aren't that fast.
This whole thing was nothing but a publicity stunt, and this just proves it. Despite his claim that this showed how fast connections can be put in the home for cheap, it does nothing of the sort. It shows how it really isn't that useful at this point, and how the gear is so high end it produces enough heat to use as a dryer.
As Slashdot is fond of saying: Nothing to see here, move along.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Also (Score:5, Interesting)
Obligatory Homer Simpson quote (modified): "7 minutes? But I want it now!"
Though out of all seriousness, I think there'd be a Field of Dreams situation if everyone had a pipe like that. If we all had that speed, someone would make content to fill it. Might not just be an internet data line. Might be digital TV data, phone data, etc, etc. In fact, that's what the summary states, she has the capability for (not necessarily the need for nor is actually using) tons of HD channels with a line that fast.
You can do more with a connection like that than just internet stuff, is what I'm saying.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Also (Score:4, Funny)
Microsoft. The next version of Windows will be measured in TB.
Reply to This
Parent
Mmm Dry Laundry (Score:4, Funny)
Reply to This
Good move (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Hey! (Score:4, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:Hey! (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Hey! (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah, but with a connection like that, Comcast would only have to compress HD channels to half their normal quality in order to get them all to fit in the tube!
Reply to This
Parent
In Sweeden ... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Brain the size of a planet... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
I had a great idea for exercise equipment (Score:4, Funny)
Never really got off the ground with it, though.
Reply to This
theonion.com predicting the future again... (Score:3, Funny)
(linked to alternate site 'cuz I can't find it on theonion.com...)
Reply to This
The terminal is probably good as a dryer too (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyway, even if the bandwidth is free I wouldn't call it cheap - the CPE device takes (I think) 3kW of power. So yeah, you can dry clothes on it quite easily..
Reply to This
Re:The terminal is probably good as a dryer too (Score:4, Funny)
OK, Yoda.
Reply to This
Parent
Not the first time. (Score:3, Funny)
Reply to This
And she's surfing this on what exactly? (Score:5, Interesting)
She's surfing this on what kind of PC?
Last time I checked, your typical PC doesn't come with a 40Gbps NIC in it. It's usually GigE, with 10/100 for the cheap ones. Nevermind that most folks can't afford GigE switches to plug into in the first place, which means most folks are using 10/100 anyway.
40Gbps NIC's can't exactly be cheap since they're only found in the high-end server space. In fact, I couldn't find pricing on a separate 40Gbps NIC in a quick and casual Google search. The only 40Gbps stuff I've run into is either on the switch itself or came with the server. I have a funny feeling that, if you can actually buy one of these things separately, it would cost several times more than any PC this lady is likely to own.
Next, even if you get one of these NIC's, what exactly are you going to plug it into? The craziest PCI-X slot available (2.0, 533MHz) tops out at 4.3GByte/sec, which is 34.4Gbit/sec -- too slow! PCI-E 2.0 32x (not that you'll find this kind of connector on anything common, if you can find it at all) maxes out at 16GByte/sec, which is 128Gbit/sec -- fast enough, but again I don't think anyone makes anything with this kind of a connector yet. Your more-common PCI-E 1.1e 16x connector tops out at 4GByte/sec, or 32GBit/sec -- too slow for 40Gbps feeds.
And then there's the issue of actually saving this wonderful content she's so busily downloading. Saving a full-length DVD-9 (9GB) in two seconds would require a bandwidth of 4.5GByte/sec. Most hard drives today have a max sustained write speed of 20-30MByte/sec. Some SAN's have a hard time with the bandwidth being tossed around here. Does grandma have an EMC array in the basement next to this magical fiber link?
Lastly, exactly who is grandma doing to download stuff from that can actually provide her 40Gbps of bandwidth? Most small companies have DS-1's. Medium-sized folks have multiple DS-1's, fractional DS-3's, or full DS-3's. Your larger organizations have OC-3's and OC-12's, but it starts to get really, really rarefied if you go up above that. Suffice to say, unless grandma is getting stuff from the likes of Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, or Akamai, she's not going to be able to actually keep that 40Gbps pipe busy.
Now, a good bit of the above takes a sarcastic tone, but there's a lesson in it: you're only as fast as the slowest part of the chain. There's a helluva lot of work that needs to be done on the entire information interchange infrastructure -- from the server to the PC and everything in between -- before stuff like this even begins to make sense for the average Joe. Data centers? Sure. Home 40Gbps? Not so useful.
Reply to This
Binary math and disk speeds: (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Re:Oh Noes Broadband (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent