Pain-Free Animals Could Take Suffering Out of Farming 429
Philosopher Adam Shriver suggested that genetically engineering cows to feel no pain could be an acceptable alternative to eliminating factory farming in a paper published in Neuroscience. Work by neuroscientist Zhou-Feng Chen at Washington University may turn Shriver's suggestion a reality. Chen has been working on identifying the genes that control "affective" pain, the unpleasantness part of a painful sensation. He has managed to isolate a gene called P311, and has found that mice who do not have P311 don't have negative associations with pain, although they do react negatively to heat and pressure. This could end much of the concern about cruel farming practices, but unfortunately still leaves my design for the fiery hamburger punch in the unethical column.
Just like taking an aspirin... (Score:5, Insightful)
...eliminates the soul-sucking ennui of day-to-day life.
I think they're missing the point.
Insanity (Score:4, Insightful)
CAN != Should
Exactly! (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't these idiots know that the suffering is where all the good flavor is?
Re:Exactly! (Score:5, Funny)
What? Maybe for beef, I'm not sure...
But for pigs, it's really important that you kill them unexpectedly, or the meat gets an off flavor. I always used to drop mine off at the butchers, where he'd treat them nicely for a couple days for them to get content and acclimated, then he'd shoot them when they weren't expecting it.
This is why all the best butchers are ninjas and/or members of the Spanish Inquisition.
Re:Exactly! (Score:5, Interesting)
Disclaimer: I do not believe cows suffer unduly as a general rule, and I do not believe that refusing to eat beef on ethical grounds is anything short of dumb. Add a willingness to eat fish despite the ethical objection to beef, and you're a complete hypocrite (fish are suffocated to death, while livestock are usually killed fairly painlessly). Bring on the surf and turf!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Exactly! (Score:5, Insightful)
Disclaimer: I do not believe cows suffer unduly as a general rule, and I do not believe that refusing to eat beef on ethical grounds is anything short of dumb. Add a willingness to eat fish despite the ethical objection to beef, and you're a complete hypocrite (fish are suffocated to death, while livestock are usually killed fairly painlessly). Bring on the surf and turf!
I eat fish and avoid beef on ethical grounds. I'm not dumb, or hypocritical. Every morality-based lifestyle choice operates only within certain limits, and the extent of those limits is a manifestation of the degree of importance the individual places on the underlying moral issue. The issue at hand is also not nearly as simple as you claim it to be. My primary concern is not the last five minutes of my food's life, it's everything that happens beforehand. Wild-caught fish live in a completely natural state until they are caught. While many bad things may happen to those fish in nature, humans don't cause those problems! Fish also lack the same type and degree of pain sensation that mammals have (though some studies indicate that they perceive something pain-like). Cows, on the other hand, exist only at the will of their owners, and any suffering they endure is entirely our fault. They process pain the same way humans do. I believe that, in general, livestock are not treated with the degree of care throughout their lives that is owed to a captive sentient being. Therefore, I eat fish and not beef. You may disagree with the value judgments inherent in this argument, and may dispute some of the uncertain facts regarding the nature of suffering and pain sensation (since these issues are legitimately subject to scientific debate), but that does not make my reasoning or my conclusion "dumb" or "hypocritical" any more than yours is.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Exactly! (Score:5, Funny)
This is why all the best butchers are ninjas and/or members of the Spanish Inquisition.
Ninjas I can understand, but I wasn't expecting the Spanish Inquisition.
Re:Insanity (Score:4, Insightful)
While true, how about you make a point on why they shouldn't?
Um, how about no? (Score:5, Interesting)
Pain serves a useful biological function: it allows living things to know when they have been injured.
Now, admittedly, cattle are not the brightest animals in the evolutionary tree. Nevertheless, they still know enough to stay away from things that hurt them. Removing the ability to do that can't possibly be good for their safety.
Re:Um, how about no? (Score:5, Funny)
This is why the pace of technological growth is slowing. 50 years ago, people would have looked at this and thought, wow, we can bbq live steak, and it won't try to run away.
Those people had ideas, big ideas. They looked at nuclear bombs and thought "Hey, we could get rid of those mountains blocking our view".
That is the spirit of innovation that drives true progress...
Re:Um, how about no? (Score:5, Insightful)
Probably a reduction in the effectiveness of electric fences, too.
Makes you wonder what kind of conditions they expect to raise the cattle under.
Re: (Score:2)
Who knows what side effects may show in these animals? Tromping down fences- or perhaps a fearlessness that would be dangerous to farmers.
Re:Um, how about no? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
holy shit... imagine if this procedure was done to Canadians!
Re: (Score:2)
Pain serves a useful biological function
And what purpose does it serve for the farmer? Let's not drop the context that his goal - to raise cattle - is the only one to be served. Simply stating that "pains serves a useful function" imagines some other goal, or that the function is equally useful regardless of the goal or value.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Well, for the love of $DIETY, don't forget to set a hard-to-guess private community string, unless you want random strangers tweaking the writeable objects in your neural MIB.
That would be madness!
Re:Double no (Score:5, Insightful)
Pain is a very useful sensation. Pain keeps people from doing stupid things, or from CONTINUING to do stupid things.
Ever been burned by hot water? If you were to sit in water over 110 for very long you would litterally boil yourself to death. When you put your feet in the tub and scream, that's your body's way of telling you not to boil yourself.
Ever had a broken bone? When you move a broken bone your body quickly tells you that doing so isn't the best idea by kicking in the pain. Moving it will lenghen the time it takes to heal.
Touch a hot stove often? cut yourself while shaving? sunburn? all of those things are things you want to avoid, but wouldn't know to without pain.
And you do NOT want a 1200lb cow without the ability to feel pain. That fence that keeps it from escaping onto the freeway wouldn't hold her in very long if the cow didn't feel pain. Cows are large, but not very bright. They don't understand what a car is. They don't understand what a road is. They just know they're wandering.
Evolution is a wonderful thing. If we don't need something, evolution gets rid of it. And just because we've gotten all technological and all now does not diminish the fact that we still need to feel pain.
Re:BDSM? (Score:4, Funny)
So we'll have leather-clad BDSM cows in high heels whipping each others ?
Yes! Leather made from their own hides, and it's cruelty-free!
At last! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:At last! (Score:4, Funny)
Stupid (Score:2, Funny)
Udderly Stupid (sorry, couldn't help myself).
An animal that can not feel pain would be very likely to injure itself. People who have conditions where they cannot feel pain are having to constantly check themselves for broken bones, sores, scrapes, etc. You might think it would be wonderful to live in a world without pain, but it would truly be awful.
Pain is there for a reason.... unlike this freaking 1.5" wide text area I am typing in.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I think cattle are kept in individual pens just large enough for them to fit in, they can't even turn around. I don't think they can get into much trouble.
I could be wrong about this , I just saw it in a documentary.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on the cattle. My uncle was a dairy farmer, and while his cows had stalls of cow size, they were open on one side, so the cows could go in and out as they pleased. While they looked to small to turn around in (and most cows would just back in or back out), I've seen quite a few turn around inside the stall, if a tad awkwardly. When they weren't being milked, they were allowed to roam around a field outside the barn.
I don't know how the beef industry works, but at least for small scale family dair
Re: (Score:2)
Calves are kept in pens (normally 2x their size sheltered and 3-5x their size open) when they're not kept with their mothers (normally dairy calves) until their weaned at which point they join a beef herd.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Maybe you are thinking of veal pens.
There are all kinds of ways to farm cattle. Here in New Mexico they are allowed to graze on multi-thousand acre ranches.
Pain 2.0 (Score:2)
+1 Haberman Device
"Scanner, are your bones broken? If so, go see a medic."
Re: (Score:2)
Pain is there for a reason.... unlike this freaking 1.5" wide text area I am typing in.
Try installing Stylish [mozilla.org] and adding the following custom stylesheet.
Kind of Creepy and Absurd (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm no vegan and I think PETA is a bunch of retards, but with that said, I do abhor curelty to animals.
Whether they feel no pain or tons of pain doesn't change the fact that they are treated entirely unethically. I understand that killing them is necessary for consumption of meat and I'm totally ok with that, but forcing them to live for x years in a tiny pen is just beyond cruel.
My point here is, dulling their pain real
Re:Kind of Creepy and Absurd (Score:5, Informative)
I think you are confusing beef and veal. Normal beef cows are not confined to a tiny pen.
People unfamiliar with farming underestimate the degree to which the comfort of animals is taken into account. Stressed steers are less healthy. Dairy cows produce significantly less milk when stressed or uncomfortable. Some dairies play music all day because they've found it has a calming effect and increases production.
Like anything, it's all about money. But comfortable animals help the bottom line.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I noticed that when I went to the livestock judging at the local fair recently. It was all kids' 4-H projects, and the judges were taking very careful time to explain how important it was that you handle the livestock gently, as bruised meat is essentially worthless.
I know some farming operations are rougher than others (factory farmed chickens for example), but all of the beef cattle I see raised around here spend most of their days pretty much the same as they do in the wild - wandering around through a w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The next step is to grow meat without a central nervous system at all, in arbitrary size.
It sounds creepy, but only because it is unusual. When you think about it, this method of producing meat is superior.
Re:Kind of Creepy and Absurd (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe we can genetically engineer cows to not taste so delicious -- problem solved!
Re:Kind of Creepy and Absurd (Score:4, Funny)
I'm from PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals), and we'll take off all of our clothes in protest. And unlike that OTHER group, we're not a bunch of hot vegetarians, so you will not enjoy the spectacle .
Re:Kind of Creepy and Absurd (Score:4, Insightful)
I think we should engineer plants to feel pain. That way we can screw over the pussy vegetarians and they're attempts to attain a moral high ground.
Re: (Score:2)
Arthur Dent agrees [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
The error (as I see it) in your assumption is the idea that anything that is OK in animals is OK with humans. I think of animals as slightly
We need to grow up (Score:2)
because we seem to going overboard in finding new ways to feel guilty about our lifestyle through the ages and even more absurd ways to deal with it.
Suddenly its the pain the animal feels before it dies, sorry, but hello, its the fact we killed it that should cause more guilt than the pain it felt getting to that end result.
If you object to the first but not the latter you need to grow up and accept how you live your life or give up food products requiring the death of a living creature.
Yes I am a meat eate
Re: (Score:2)
I mean what's next? Engineer ourselves to not feel pain? Then is it OK to murder?
Poor example. I'd say, "Is it ok to murder someone if you know their consciousness will be immediately downloaded into an exact duplicate of their body?" Murder isn't about pain, as you can die in non-painful ways. It's about not existing anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy (Score:3, Funny)
Dish of the Day: Good evening, madame and gentlemen. I am the main dish of the day. May I interest you in parts of my body? May I urge you, sir, to consider my liver? It must be very rich and tender by now. I have been force feeding myself for months.
Military applications (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Humans already develop this "ability" occasionally. There are two forms (that I'm aware of), one that can't sense pain, and the other that can't sense pain or heat. Being born with either usually means a short life. If I bite my tongue, I stop before I do serious damage. If I touch a hot stove, I pull back quickly. These reactions aren't automatic for CIPA sufferers (CIP [wikipedia.org] sufferers might react to the stove). When I get a splinter in my foot, I remove it. If I get an infected ingrown nail or hair, I app
Pushed to their limits? (Score:2)
So now that farm animals can feel no pain, we can just push them until they drop dead in the fields?
Re: (Score:2)
sweet!
however that would be pretty stupid and wasteful, economically.
Human without pain do not have a goodlife (Score:2)
Not a good idea (Score:2)
A pain-free animal would quickly injure itself, and die.
There is a good reason for pain.
Clone Meat (Score:2)
Most of the vegetarians I've asked would eat meat that had been cloned in a vat. It would presumably be much more efficient in terms of energy than raising live animals as well, since all the energy could go into the juicy and delicious parts without wasting it on such incidentals as walking around and mooing.
Making the cow inured to pain? So the majority of people would go from not worrying one jot about how the animal feels, to.... oh. Vegetarians would probably just start to refuse to eat the meat on the
Can't they just lobotomize them? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Can't they just lobotomize them? (Score:5, Informative)
Having worked on a dairy farm for years, and seeing that I have 8 hogs in my back yard, I'm going to call bullshit on this one. Dairy cattle are typically allowed to freely roam for most of the day. Their day goes like this:
Wake up in a large barn, with 400 or so other cows. Mosey out into a holding pen and stand there until let into the milk barn. Stand there and get milked. Blow snot on the person milking you. Crap all over the place, try to splatter on the person milking you. Walk out into a field. Stand around and chew on grass all day. Come back to the holding pen because your udder is full and uncomfortable. Stand there until let into the milk barn. Stand there and get milked. Blow snot on the person milking you. Crap all over the place, try to splatter on the person milking you. Walk out into a field. Chew on some grass. Go back to the barn and go to sleep.
Hog pens are messy, but that's not because they're mistreated - pigs can't effectively sweat, so they cover themselves with wet mud to help dissipate heat. I promise, they *prefer* it that way. The pens are usually about 10x10' per pig.
Re: (Score:2)
its not the pain (Score:5, Insightful)
Feeling no pain is different from experiencing distress. Its not the pain that most activists are worried about, its the living conditions, the over crowding, the bad feed.
Get a grip.
Gregor
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Although they might not be as well developed as human emotions, anyone who's spent any significant amount of time with an mammal at least as complex as a dog or cat should be convinced that they most certainly can experience states of mind that include things like fear or stress. They are definitely more comfortable in some situations than they are in others. I personally have not spent much time around cows, but it seems rather likely to me that someone who has would easily be able to tell what sorts of si
No! (Score:2)
"It's impossible! These cows... they..?! They DON'T FEEL A THING! They can't be stopped!"
And in future news... (Score:2, Insightful)
Pain-free Asian children could take the suffering out of Nike shoes...
I don't want to sound like a douche or anything, but I became vegitarian (not vegan though) a few months ago, and except for a few exceptions for fish, I've stuck to it pretty tight. I'll joke about the Nirvana lyric 'its ok to eat fish because they don't have any feelings', but this is kind of just a step too far. Yeah, I think its somewhat ghoulish to find nourishment in the cha
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
No it isn't. What is really funny is all the vegetarians tend to be Evolutionists who haven't figured out that Humans are Omnivores designed to eat just about anything. oops, I said Designed, gasp.
Yeah... pretty much no (Score:2)
This will only help cruelty (Score:3, Insightful)
This could end much of the concern about cruel farming practices, but unfortunately still leaves my design for the fiery hamburger punch in the unethical column.
No, I think it will only raise the concerns. Just because an animal can't feel you pushing it around with a forklift doesn't mean it isn't cruel. Further, pain is a safety of sorts...that an animal can feel pain and react to it is motivation for its owners/caretakers to treat it properly. Granted, there are some sick people who don't care, but thankfully, many people at least feel guilt at the sound and sight of an animal in pain. Why exactly are we taking that away, instead of treating the animals better? Oh yes, right, profit.
Furthermore, while I enjoy a tasty cheeseburger as much as any other omnivore, I have enough vegetarian friends to know that their concerns in the "treatment of animals" department (there are MANY reasons people go vegetarian) extend well beyond immediate pain. It's also the concept of keeping animals in captivity they object to, and they don't really mean the cute farm your kids draw. They mean the megafarms where animals spend their entire lives in a pen the size of your shower.
Inflicting pain harms at least 2 parties. (Score:2)
Do we really want to encourage the idea that people can inflict injury or pain on animals without shame? Not all animals would be engineered in this way. Some of those will be your pets others will be in the wild. Can people who get used to the guilt free abuse of animals really be expected to turn that behavior off when they are around your pets or children or, for that matter other adults? I doubt it. They will be completely desensitized. Frightening.
BTW I am an omnivore. I just think that cruelty
I've heard this somewhere before... (Score:5, Insightful)
'That's absolutely horrible,' exclaimed Arthur, 'the most revolting thing I've ever heard.'
'What's the problem Earthman?' said Zaphod, now transfering his attention to the animal's enormous rump.
'I just don't want to eat an animal that's standing there inviting me to,' said Arthur, 'It's heartless.'
'Better than eating an animal that doesn't want to be eaten,' said Zaphod.
'That's not the point,' Arthur protested. Then he thought about it for a moment. 'Alright,' he said, 'maybe it is the point. I don't care, I'm not going to think about it now. I'll just ... er ... I
think I'll just have a green salad,' he muttered.
'May I urge you to consider my liver?' asked the animal, 'it must be very rich and tender by now, I've been force-feeding myself for months.'
Cows? That's it? Get some imagination! (Score:2)
Wow. Talk about a lack of vision. If you've got a precise identification of a pain gene and a sequence of it, you're on the path to identifying the protein it makes and then finding chemicals that bind to that protein, affecting its function.
Who gives a damn about humanely slaughtering cows? This is the starting point to the perfect medication for patients with debilitating chronic pain. It might also be the starting point to drugged-up super-soldiers and, if you can find drugs that turn *on* the pain p
Re: (Score:2)
Ethics (Score:2)
So, if these cows do not feel pain, would it still be considered inhumane to take actions against them that would normally cause pain?
So what's the idea here? (Score:2)
are farmers planning on giving cows medical marijuana now?
Hitchhikers Guide: Restaurant @ end of Universe... (Score:2)
Maybe we should take some of Peter Davison's DNA and the DNA of a Painless Cow and you have an animal that wants you to eat it and is offended if you do not eat it.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Dmritard96 (Score:5, Informative)
Now, particularly for adults, the ability to sense pain as a mere signal, rather than as, well, pain, would be quite nice.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
While it would certainly be desirable to have the ability to "turn down" the pain, permanently attenuating it would be bad, because it decreases dynamic range, either distorting the scale of pain, or more likely causing some low-level pains (like sore muscles) to go completely unnoticed.
Fortunately, we do have the ability to temporarily reduce pain levels, and it's automatically triggered when needed -- adrenaline!
Re: (Score:2)
It can also take the survival instincts out of animals, which is why people are concerned that this isn't a *good idea*, same as it would be for us humans.
Re:What is this doing under idle? (Score:4, Insightful)
They're not bred to survive, they're bred to die.
I do see the philosophical ramifications though. Why force all these miserable fast food workers to slave away all day when we can make fast food workers that enjoy it? That kind of thing.
Re:What is this doing under idle? (Score:5, Insightful)
Because its a solution looking for a problem.
Your average farm animal does not suffer much pain in its life. At least not since we stopped harnessing them for pulling plows.
Large animals, cattle, hogs, probably feel one brief instance of pain as the are slaughtered, but other than that modern
animal husbandry does not involve inflicting pain. Even the ear tags used on cows do not seem to bother them much.
Watching them punch those tags in, many animals don't even seem to notice.
Chickens and turkeys life in crowded areas, and occasionally stampede each other, but other than that they live
a boring but pain free existence.
This is a stupid idea. The animals would hurt themselves more with this than without it. The barbed wire fence would
rip grazing cattle to shreds if they couldn't feel it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How did I know you vegans would weigh in with your overwrought horror stories.
Unlike you, I've actually worked on a farm, so don't bring that nonsense around here.
Right, because we all know that the world's demand for meat is easily met by your little family farms, and that industrial factory farming [wikipedia.org] is entirely a myth propagated by smelly hippie animal rights terrorists to further their agenda of enslaving meat-eating humans.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
there are people who cannot feel pain.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/915341/people_who_cant_feel_pain.html?cat=52 [associatedcontent.com]
counterintuitively, it's not a good thing.
what would be a good thing would be partially desensitized to pain. that way you get the information ("hey, you should pull your hand off the stove burner") without the incapacitating effects.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Brainless! (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not just 'engineer' them to have no brain at all, just like the guy who suggested this!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Why is he brainless? I'd feel a lot more comfortable eating meat that was "grown" like a vegetable than eating meat that's the body of a slaughtered animal. Brainless cows sound like a perfect solution. Given of course that it's even possible.
Re: (Score:2)
except eventually it will be better then 99% of all other meat.
Cows really aren't aware there going to die, so there isn't any mental anguish.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This is still a retarded solution to a non-existant problem (or one we have no desire to solve).
First of all, there are already humane ways to kill animals (and humans) without them feeling any discomfort—and they're a heck of a lot simpler/cheaper than genetically engineering animals to feel no pain. Aside from creating another genetically-modified life-form that megacorporations like Monsanto can patent can make billions from it, there's nothing to be gained from this.
You want to kill an animal with
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Brainless! (Score:5, Insightful)
Even if the animal cannot feel physical pain, it's still going to be spending its entire life in cramped, inhumane living conditions.
Bingo. The problem isn't the physical pain the animals feel. It's the terrible conditions they're made to live in. Most animals can't contemplate death (we count as at least one exception) but I am pretty sure they're able to be dissatisfied with living their entire lives in an overcrowded box doing nothing but gaining weight.
To borrow an example from somewhere in Michael Pollan's excellent The Omnivore's Dilemma, pigs are weaned off their mother's milk after ten days so they can be put on a special feed that makes them gain weight faster in modern industrial meat production. It helps the bottom line, but it does leave the improperly-weaned pig with a lifelong urge to chew and suck. What's the only thing to chew and suck in a pen full of your fellow pig? Their tails, of course. So they chew and suck the tails of their fellow-pigs, who, unlike normal, healthy pigs, have given up fighting off any potential tail-biters.
That causes infection, which raises costs. The common "solution" is to cut the pigs' tails off when they're young. Without anesthetic (Why bother? A pig can't sue you for inhumane treatment...). Sure, having pain-free pigs would make the act of cutting off the tail less inhumane, but it's not really solving the problem of why you need to cut these pigs' tails off in the first place.
In my view, the problem is industrialized agriculture practices. The approach has been: treat these complex, living, breathing animals as simple meat-growing machines. Pack them together as close as possible, that kind of thing. When they get sick, the solution isn't to ask why they're living knee-deep in their own sewage like no healthy animal should, it's to put them on antibiotics. When they get depressed and start eating each others' tails off, the solution isn't to ask why they feel the need to chew and suck their whole lives. The solution is to cut the tail off early. When people begin to complain about the pain these animals feel, the solution isn't to ask why these animals' lives are so painful, it's to take away their capacity for pain.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
"I am pretty sure they're able to be dissatisfied with living their entire lives in an overcrowded box doing nothing but gaining weight."
Animals are certainly capable of that - if they were Gazelles, they would be dead. But they're cows... that they can sort of deal with such conditions is part of why we domesticated them in the first place, as opposed to, say, those Gazelles.
And I don't know if an animal would be unhappy about gaining weight. Why should they? A reliable food supply is n.1 on most animal's
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sounds like the solution is to engineer the ability to grow slabs of pure standalone muscle. No pain, no consciousness -- no animal at all; just tissue.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Major exceptions are ritual slaughter methods used in Islam and some other religions. In t
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Cows really aren't aware there going to die
Do you know if there is/have any links to any concrete evidence for that besides the obvious feelgood factor?
Theoretically the genetic component of fear of death should be similar for most more developed animals, simply because it's a genetic survival trait. Humans certainly have a vastly superior ability to express their feelings about it, and that, perhaps more unique, ability to carry knowledge between generations over centuries has left us with some rather exte
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
If your servers screamed every time you had to reboot them, would you so willingly install Microsoft software on them?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That would be a pain free sheep, a pain free cow would go on a bullpage.