Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

Teenager Invents Cheap Solar Panel From Human Hair 366

Milan Karki, 18, who comes from a village in rural Nepal, believes he has found the solution to the developing world's energy needs. A solar panel made from human hair. The hair replaces silicon, a pricey component typically used in solar panels, and means the panels can be produced at a low cost for those with no access to power. The solar panel, which produces 9 volts (18 watts) of energy, costs around $38 US (£23) to make from raw materials. Gentlemen, start your beards. The future of hair farming is here!

*

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Teenager Invents Cheap Solar Panel From Human Hair

Comments Filter:
  • Everyday (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Monkeedude1212 ( 1560403 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:05PM (#29367883) Journal

    The world gets a little weirder...

  • Re:It's green... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by FlyingSquidStudios ( 1031284 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:14PM (#29368047)
    I don't know about that. Any barber's dumpster will have lots of free hair for the taking.
  • Re:Everyday (Score:3, Insightful)

    by rolfwind ( 528248 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:14PM (#29368055)

    Scams are older than the human species.

    The world doesn't get weirder, although I wonder if it gets more gullible...

    I think there is a 9V battery in that contraption, going by voltage reader.

  • by ggraham412 ( 1492023 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:22PM (#29368211)
    I'm disturbed by the lack of corroboration. I'm amused by the fact that this probable hoax made it into the daily mail. I'm hopeful that maybe I can make even more efficient solar panels from toenail clippings or poo smeared on aluminum foil.
  • Ridiculous! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Ancient_Hacker ( 751168 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:23PM (#29368221)

    This is really ridiculous.

    The pictures show a few strands of hair. A few questions come to mind:

    (1) Hair is not conductive. How can hair produce electricity if it can't conduct electrons worth a darn?

    (2) Hair is not polarized-- it's the same all the way through and throughout its length. How can there be any potential difference set up across something uniform?

    (3) The amount of hair shown captures maybe 0.1 cm^2 of sunlight. Even if it had 100% efficiency, that would only be 1/100th of one watt. How could it be lighting up a 5-watt fluorescent lamp with that?

    Everything about this story sounds major-league bogus.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:24PM (#29368241)

    If the Daily Mail headline is "Could X do/cause/be Y?", the answer is almost certainly "No".

  • Re:It's green... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by tool462 ( 677306 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:25PM (#29368249)

    It's free for the taking because as of yet there is no value to freshly cut hair (unless it's long enough to make a wig out of). Even though this article has an overwhelming stench of bullshit, if it were true and human hair became an energy source, the price of that hair would rise dramatically. "Goldilocks" would take on a whole new meaning...

  • Re:9V != 18W (Score:3, Insightful)

    by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:26PM (#29368257) Homepage

    It is barely possible that he kluged up something that puts out 9 volts into the extremely high impedence of a digital voltmeter. The rest is bullshit, perhaps originated by the same doofus who thinks that a watt is a unit of energy.

  • by dgatwood ( 11270 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:26PM (#29368271) Homepage Journal

    It's an incomplete story. What we need to know to evaluate cost is A. life expectancy, and B. W/m^2. A solar panel that produces the same wattage for a price comparable to some of the higher density solar panels (IIRC) is cool if it lasts at least as long and has similar density. Otherwise, the replacement costs or the shipping costs and installation footprint make it more expensive, respectively.

  • Re:9V != 18W (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jimmyswimmy ( 749153 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:28PM (#29368295)
    You should be surprised to get 2A out of this cell at any voltage! First, Ohm's Law doesn't dictate that a supply voltage be stable while current is being drawn. The internal resistance of the hair cell or whatever this [very unlikely] thing is will not be zero, therefore the output voltage will not remain a perfect 8.98 V as you load it. I have a hard time believing that a hair solar cell could exist (and the article did not convince me and should not convince you). I have a much harder time believing that such a thing could start up one of those CFL lights he is holding there.

    The conductivity of hair is very low. I know this because I have inadvertently applied 600 V between 3/4" of hair and my (thankfully dry and unsweaty) skull, yet I live to type about it. The possibility of a hair solar cell is, in my oh-so-humble opinion, exceedingly unlikely.

    However, I was [for once] inspired to RTFA.
  • Re:9V != 18W (Score:2, Insightful)

    by enriquevagu ( 1026480 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:34PM (#29368391)
    Also, note that neither 9V (voltage) nor 18 Watts (power) are energy values
  • by gadget junkie ( 618542 ) <gbponz@libero.it> on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:49PM (#29368641) Journal

    .....We can at last import energy from kazhakistan!!!!!! [youtube.com]
  • Re:9V != 18W (Score:3, Insightful)

    by gtbritishskull ( 1435843 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @01:58PM (#29368767)
    I am confused about your point. Energy is just power * time. So, if he runs this thing for an hour (assuming it actually does what the article says it does, which is a huge assumption) then he will have 18watt-hour of energy (or 64.8 kJoule). Are you saying that you think it will burn up in an hour, because supposedly it can last a week or so.
  • by sznupi ( 719324 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @02:16PM (#29369005) Homepage

    Honestly, I think people who associated "short hair = manly" (after wars of XIX and first half of XX century, where shaving was an effective way of supressing diseases without access to sanitation; when millions of young, shawed pawns in hands of rulers were coming back they suddenly became hero veterans...just for being pawns) should mind their own business.

    Really, I can't believe how so many woman were scammed into this "model" of manhood - one that disguises poor personal hygiene, diseases and genetic disorders. Body hair is a very obvious giveaway if any of those things are lacking (not if you shave them of course), a very useful thing for a female when selecting a male. Historically, mainly cultures lacking in those areas preferred shaving...because they couldn't get healthy looking hair anyway.

  • Dilemmas! (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Just Some Guy ( 3352 ) <kirk+slashdot@strauser.com> on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @02:32PM (#29369241) Homepage Journal

    I'd like free electricity, but I really hoped to write a successful computer language some day. What to do?

  • by TeethWhitener ( 1625259 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @02:52PM (#29369579)

    Alright, so everyone's probably been right so far that stringing a few strands of hair across a grid of thumbtacks probably won't light a CFL. Here's what probably happened: the kid made a device and showed that it can collect sunlight. Using a few rudimentary calculations, he scaled up his results to show that a working model with about a pound of hair would give something on the order of 18 watts of power (in full sunlight). The Daily Mail pounced on it because they don't know any better. And voila! Sensationalized story. That doesn't mean it can't be done. I'd say we should feel cautiously optimistic about this story and look at the science behind it as opposed to focusing on what the news agency said about it. As we all know, news agencies are notoriously bad scientists.

    Also, if melanin is the key to hair having semiconductive properties, doesn't this mean...ah nevermind, how about just 'Insert blond joke here.'

  • Re:9V != 18W (Score:3, Insightful)

    by canajin56 ( 660655 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @03:14PM (#29369969)
    His point is it says it produces "9 volts (18 watts) of energy", and neither of those units is energy. Why is that so hard to understand? My new car is able to travel 200 horsepower (90 miles per hour) on a single tank of gas. Nothing objectionable about that statement?
  • by icebike ( 68054 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @04:08PM (#29370821)

    That's what I thought too.

    The chances of this being both real AND viable if developed in the best labs of Japan, Germany, Korea, or the US would be slim to none.

    The chances of being developed by a kid from a village with no electricity are astronomically small. (Here is where I get modded troll for showing a western bias. So be it.)

    Everybody up-thread is debating ohm's law and assorted fine points while failing to notice the 800 pound gorilla looking over their shoulder. Do these people thing materials research would have missed this attribute of hair? These things are not done by chance any more like Edison tinkering in his lab and jerking whiskers out of a passing cat trying to develop a filament for a light bulb. You need a material that has certain properties, you key it into the computer and out pops all the candidates, the good, the bad, and the ridiculous, all rated on any number of scales you wish.

    A little skepticism goes a long way.

  • by Bruce Perens ( 3872 ) * <bruce@perens.com> on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @05:44PM (#29372205) Homepage Journal
    I agree that it sounds seriously bogus, and the board with paper clips and hairs between them isn't an 18 watt panel unless the hair is on fire. The big question would be whether anyone could duplicate getting power out of a single hair. This should be an easy experiment with a digital voltmeter. But there is no information on what would be the required first step, polarizing the hair.
  • Re:awesome (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Hogwash McFly ( 678207 ) on Wednesday September 09, 2009 @06:15PM (#29372593)

    Careful you don't nick the plastic with the razor or all of the air will escape.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...