Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Idle Technology

Over a Third of the Internet Is Pornographic 247

Th'Inquisitor writes "Pornography makes up 37% of the total number of web pages online, according to a new study published by Optenet, a SaaS provider. According to the report, which looked at a representative sample of around four million extracted URLs, adult content on the Internet increased by 17% in the first quarter of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Over a Third of the Internet Is Pornographic

Comments Filter:
  • Anonymous Coward (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:24PM (#32594492)

    The Internet is for porn.

  • by commodore64_love ( 1445365 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:24PM (#32594500) Journal

    A lot of sites are nothing more than naked bodies. I'd estimate only about ~20% are actual porn (sex).

    I wish people would stop confusing the two, because they are not the same.

  • no content (Score:4, Insightful)

    by fermion ( 181285 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:32PM (#32594652) Homepage Journal
    There is no content in this article, just a statement of random unsubstantiated statistics.

    And what if the random trivia is true? What if half the internet is for adults? Aren't half the people in the world adults? Why should they not have a representative portion of the internet? So we have to sanitize the world for the developmentally challenged that have never seen a real vagina or penis.

    And then, what is pornographic? If I write a story with a plot and gratuitous sex scene is that pornographic? We want definitions.

    This is just a useless piece of fluff intended to make people who aren't getting laid mess in their pants. Oh, think of the kids. Oh, Oh, the kids. We have to protect, the Oh, kids.

    We already know that 99.99999% of the interent has no useful content. Yahoo is evidently becoming the ultimate porn site by advertising it is the place of entertainment news. Pretty soon the only safe place to be will be /. Even XKCD can't be trusted. Fuck.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:33PM (#32594680)

    "Ana Luisa Rotta, director of child protection projects at Optenet"

    So they have a commercial interest in this topic and to make things even worse, they claim to be "child protection"... those are the worst. I don't trust this study or them at all.

  • by rundgong ( 1575963 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:39PM (#32594758)
    According to the report, which probably looked at a well chosen sample of around four million extracted URLs, adult content on the Internet increased by 17% in the first quarter of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009."

    When someone tries to sell you software to protect you from the evil porn that you might accidentally see on the internet, I'm not sure I'm gonna believe their claims of how much porn there is.
  • by amanicdroid ( 1822516 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:40PM (#32594766)
    How much of that is malware disguised as porn?
  • by Kitkoan ( 1719118 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:42PM (#32594796)
    To be honest, I doubt the market can truly be over saturated. It like books, movies and music, no matter how many are made, someone will always be willing to buy more. As for those production companies that have folded, I've heard of this issue and the big issue seems to be that too many people are making their own 'home-made porno' which is flooding the market with too easy 'cheap/free' porn.
  • by thrawn_aj ( 1073100 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @04:54PM (#32594984)
    Indeed. Of course, I find it amusing that big porno companies are decrying this "loss of quality" in the field, as if they were actual artists. To them I can only say - drop the delusions of grandeur if you want to survive today's market and give the people what they want - that's literally your only function (indulging the will of your consumers). There are no connoisseurs to grant you protective patronage nor any sympathy to be had from a society that detests you in public (while using you quite shamelessly in private). Sad but that's how it is.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @05:06PM (#32595152)

    At first I thought, "no way", but then I considered that they were saying web pages, not web domains. No doubt, any single porn website might have thousands of individual pages, whereas most websites only have a few dozen. So yeah, I could see 37%.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @05:07PM (#32595164)

    I just wish they wouldn't try to outdo each other by making porn more extreme and less erotic in the process. Please stop the gross spitting and choking that seems to have taken over. That is about as sexy as a day at Gitmo.

  • by nurb432 ( 527695 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @05:08PM (#32595192) Homepage Journal

    What difference does it make anyway?

    Personally as long as i find the content i need, i don't care what else is there.

  • Re:How stupid. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @05:08PM (#32595194)
    Umm... no?

    It treats the prostitutes as prostitutes, who -can- be murdered, robbed, or slept with, because freedom is the entire theme of the game.

    It treats random woemn on the street as random women on the street. You can murder and rob them if you want to, but there's no unique incentive for it. They dress nicely. They talk to each other about their likes and dislikes. They have places to go. They dress differently in different areas. It's a rich, complex, and -satirical- simulation of a large city.

    The two women who feature prominently in the plot of the game or almost entirely supportive of the player character and his cousin (who deserves less).

    The player can write emails to his momma telling her how things are going. They always leave out the gritty details, because, as I think Russell Crowe said, "even bad men love their mommas". I'd say it's the second best game ever made, after Fallout 3.
  • by commodore64_love ( 1445365 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @05:33PM (#32595596) Journal

    >>>porn and erotica

    I don't see any difference. If there's a real or fake dick being inserted in a hole, or a pussy being licked, then it's sex and qualifies as "porn" for me. i.e. Not something I'd show children under age 13.

    On the other hand nudity is just that - a body without clothes. Lots of cultures think nudity is acceptable, and a photo of that nudity is not "porn" (or evil as some Puritan-americans claim). I don't care if my kid sees it.

  • Re:How stupid. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by h4rr4r ( 612664 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @05:38PM (#32595658)

    So prototype desensitizes me to jumping off the tops of buildings and gliding to the next one?

  • by Knara ( 9377 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @05:49PM (#32595812)
    Some people like it. I like it sometimes. Depends on my mood. There's still tons more vanilla porn out there for folks like you.
  • by CAIMLAS ( 41445 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @06:00PM (#32595942)

    People "buy" porn? When did they start doing that again?

    Porn is free for those who look, and has been for the better part of the last decade. It's so prevailant that it's difficult to avoid. The market is, for all intents and purposes, "saturated".

    Porn is not like books, because books cost money to produce and can be sold for only so much. There are publisher controls on how many get printed each year, and so on, so as to not overwhelm customers and create a glut of supply.

    Will the amount of porn go down? God no. But it is likely that the quality of "good" porn will go down as the amateurs take over with free, ad-supported content.

  • by SanityInAnarchy ( 655584 ) <ninja@slaphack.com> on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @07:54PM (#32597046) Journal

    That depends very much what you mean by "good", which is why (I'm guessing) you put it in quotes. "Amateur" is an entire fetish of its own anyhow -- one which people pay for, oddly enough.

  • Re:How stupid. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by danbert8 ( 1024253 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @07:57PM (#32597070)

    Wow, chalk up another one for Rule 34...

    http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Rule_34 [encycloped...matica.com]

  • by chromas ( 1085949 ) on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @08:18PM (#32597232)
    Or, depending on the video, crap on the shoes...

The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin

Working...