Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Image

China's Nine-Day Traffic Jam Tops 62 Miles 198

Posted by samzenpus
from the living-on-the-road dept.
A traffic jam on the Beijing-Tibet expressway has now entered its ninth day and has grown to over 62 miles in length. This mother-of-all delays has even spawned its own micro-economy of local merchants selling water and food at inflated prices to stranded drivers. Can you imagine how infuriating it must be to see someone leave their blinker on for 9 days?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China's Nine-Day Traffic Jam Tops 62 Miles

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Holy crap! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jonbryce (703250) on Monday August 23 2010, @12:23PM (#33342946) Homepage

    The whole journey is 3620km long, and takes about 3 days to drive in normal traffic. Traffic is getting through, it is just running slowly because of road works to widen the road. The delays have been going on for 9 days, but that doesn't mean it is the same cars as 9 days ago.

  • Re:WTF (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jonbryce (703250) on Monday August 23 2010, @12:26PM (#33343000) Homepage

    For the 3620km inter-province highway, probably not. Cell phones tend not to work outside cities, and Tibet is a very rural area.

  • Doctor Who (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Beardydog (716221) on Monday August 23 2010, @12:49PM (#33343348)
    Wasn't this an episode of Doctor Who a couple of years ago? It turned out some kind of monster had organized the whole thing so it could eat people in the underground tunnels, I think.China should check for monsters.
  • Re:Holy crap! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by amicusNYCL (1538833) on Monday August 23 2010, @01:35PM (#33344090)

    Are you for real? You actually believe its the same cars stuck in there for 9 days and not just a traffic bottleneck being over reported?

    I doubt cars have been stuck in there for all 9 days, but keep in mind that there are food and water vendors, which implies that cars are in fact stationary in the same place for an extended period.

  • by Red Flayer (890720) on Monday August 23 2010, @03:23PM (#33345804) Journal
    FWIW, that's not completely accurate. There is more to what constitutes wear on a highway than the vehicles that drive on it. You've got wear-and-tear from use, but you've also got to factor in the natural deprecation caused by weather, plants, etc.

    So if you wanted to assign true cost, you'd have a fixed fee (for all vehicles) assigned to cover the fixed costs, and a proportional fee levied to cover the variable use-dependent costs.

    Aside from that, your point stands.

    And I'd like to add that if we subsidize rail like we subsidize highways, it's be MUCH cheaper than currently, with much higher usage rates, and so we'd likely be able to afford a much better rail system.

    But for some reason we expect rail systems to be self-sufficient, while we sink billions upon billions into roads, highways, and waterways.
  • by Amlothi (207848) on Monday August 23 2010, @08:53PM (#33349520)

    Why is this modded insightful? It isn't. You are thinking about this from the perspective of what would happen in the US, and China is not the same. Obviously the poster and the mods have never spent much time in China.

    There are more people here that you can imagine. The infrastructure cannot keep up with the population growth. In this particular area, the only alternate road is under construction. Look at a map. It would take an extra 9 hours at least if you take an alternate route, and that is provided you can get off the highway, turn around, and go back.

    The government does it's best to control the traffic, but the number of people with cars is growing faster than they can keep up. In Beijing, you can only drive your car in the city 4 days a week. (Everyone has 1 day they are not allowed to drive, and it rotates.) Traffic is still horrible, even with 1/5 of the cars parked at home every day.

    It is a major throughfare connecting to the capital city. You cannot just "close access" to the entire highway for a 60 mile stretch. You would essentially be cutting off all of those rural communities from the rest of the country for the entire summer until the construction projects are complete.

    It just isn't feasible.

    cars are simply unable to move once on the ramp causing people to do u-turns, etc, which causes its own hazards...

    This confirms my suspicion what you have no idea what traffic is like in China. This (cars unable to move, illegal u-turns causing hazards, etc) happens all the time on a normal day here. The drivers are used to it, and they drive under the assumption that most people don't follow the rules.

    I realize that someone who has never left the US might not understand, and the gut reaction might be "OMG, look how uncivilized China is!" but that is just your ignorance showing through. The American media doesn't help, because (on some level) the powers that be want us to think that about China, so that is the national image of the PRC that is repeated over and over in the West.

    BTW, I was in Vermont during the Phish concert mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phish_festivals#Coventry
    The US isn't any better at handling the traffic situation. I don't recall them closing the highway in Vermont when this happened.

Many are called, few volunteer.

Working...