Sex Drugs and Texting 287
statesman writes "The Associated Press reports that teens who text frequently are three and a half times more likely to have sex. A survey of 4,200 public high school students in the Cleveland area found that one in five students sent more than 120 text messages a day or spent more than 3 hours a day on Facebook. Students in this group were much more likely to have sex. Alcohol and drug use also correlate with frequent texting and heavy Facebook use."
Shocking... (Score:5, Insightful)
Who knew?
So let me get this straight. (Score:4, Insightful)
Kids who have a social life are more likely to do social activities than their non-social peers?
Shocking!
Of Course (Score:5, Insightful)
Wow. (Score:3, Insightful)
Social kids do social things.... news at 11 (Score:4, Insightful)
Sex and texting (Score:3, Insightful)
"It's neither possible nor interesting to do anything else when completely wasted. And whose leg is that anyway".
side note: increasing irritation with the dichotomy between alcohol and (other) drugs.
Well duh (Score:3, Insightful)
Both are caused by an active social life (Score:2, Insightful)
I'll be the first to say it: Correlation does not imply causation.
It should not be surprising that heavy facebook use and texting indicates a more active social life. Teenagers with a more active social life are more likely to be in social situations that could lead to risky social behaviours.
In all likelyhood both are being caused by having an active social life.
The key, as usual, is the parents (Score:5, Insightful)
That's the key there. The same kids who are allowed to text that much and spend that much time on Facebook (3 hours a day? seriously?) probably aren't getting a whole lot of direction from their parents in any other aspect of their lives either. I'm guessing you could correlate high school dropout rates, teen pregnancies, and basically every other negative statistic involving teenagers with this same behavior. The unifying factor in all of it is permissive or absent parents. It seems that once their kids hit puberty, a lot of parents just sort of figure the kids have got their shit together and it's time to move from parent mode to friend mode. Yes, as kids age they need to be let off the leash a little more to live their own lives, but a lot of parents take that way too far and just sort of release the kids into the wild and let them sink or swim entirely on their own once they hit high school (or even middle school!). The result is the kids get the guidance they're missing from their parents from their friends instead, and that's never a good thing.
Re:Shocking... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Gateway drugs (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously. Back in my day we just did drugs, no cell phones or social networks needed.
Re:Shocking... (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, NOT having a cell phone made it much easier to get away with trouble. Growing up, there were not cameras EVERYWHERE, so you wouldn't get caught sucking on the skull bong, nor did you risk getting nekkid pics set up where everyone could see them.
And if you were late coming in at night...you had the excuse that you couldn't get near a phone when the car "broke down".
Yep...in many ways, low tech made for a better life for a teen as far as getting away with trouble goes.
Not quite.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Teenagers who have a social life that is driven by peer validation, rather than, say, quality of social interaction or deep interest in a certain activity, are more likely to have sex and/or engage in risk taking behaviors in an attempt to impress those peers. I remember when I was growing up, parents were being warned about teenagers spending more than an hour a night on the phone being the cause of all types of 'naughty' 'nefarious' activity. In previous decades it was probably the kids who went to outdoor concerts, or the kids always heading up to a lovers lane or old quarry to drink. In the Victorian era these people were called dandies. The technology is essentially irrelevant, so long as that segment of the population exists, they'll do whatever is 'in thing.'
A 'social life' is not a one size fits all label. There are very, very few non-social people in the world, which is the main reason solitary confinement drives people nuts--it's that the value each person places on different types of social interaction varies enormously.
Re:Anonymous Coward (Score:4, Insightful)
I like to minimize the time spent doing awful things like sex, so I can spend more quality time on things like open source projects on github and submitting kernel patches.
You're free to do what you want with your time, just don't ask me to join you in your walled garden of sex and wasted time.
Re:Reverse causation (Score:3, Insightful)
Depends on your definition of "drugs".
Alcohol and marijuana are fine, given some degree of moderation.
But start talking about stuff like methamphetamines, and I think there's a problem.
not popular, just needy (Score:4, Insightful)
If you are texting all day long, you're aching for attention. That doesn't mean you are popular. Probably the opposite is true, at least in your own mind. You're begging for attention, for confirmation that others give a damn about you.
Re:Not quite.. (Score:5, Insightful)
What exactly is wrong with teenagers having sex? I'm entirely unclear as to why this is considered a universally bad thing. Just make sure they know about STDs and how to use condoms, and let them go to town. It won't hurt.
Letting teenagers drive, on the other hand - that is a bad fucking idea. Way, way more teenagers die or get injured because they suck at driving than because they're having sex.
It's so weird how badly weighted our society's sense of danger is.
Re:Shocking... (Score:1, Insightful)
Actually that is an excellent idea, the youth of today should demand that we refuse to pay for their wars and demand we pay it off with their SS and Medicare benefits.
Jesus Christ... (Score:5, Insightful)
The other possibility is that teenagers have sex, drink, and use drugs because they enjoy those activities, just the same way that adults do. Yes, there are risks involved, and yes those activities are dangerous when pursued irresponsibly. That doesn't always mean that they are giving in to peer pressure.
Teens who chose not to have sex are typically making that choice because of the huge pressure society puts on them. Waiting until you are 18 to have sex is *not* biologically natural.
Re:Not quite.. (Score:3, Insightful)