Competition Aims To Make Cybergeeks Cool 134
itwbennett writes "The organizers of the Cyber Foundations program have some lofty goals. In addition to identifying a new generation of security experts, they want to make cybergeeks as cool as sports stars, said Alan Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute, a sponsor of the competition. The competition includes tests in computer networking, operating systems and systems administration. Registration is open until Feb. 18. and prizes include four full-ride college scholarships sponsored by the U.S. Navy, gift certificates, and letters of recognition from governors and members of the U.S. Congress."
You can start with the name (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:You can start with the name (Score:2)
It's a necessary clarificative. Without it, how would you know if you were talking about just plain geeks, vs geeks who like to cyber all the time. This is a competition for cybergeeks.
Re:You can start with the name (Score:1)
>> computer networking, operating systems and systems administration
They should call them what they are, skiddies. ;)
Re:You can start with the name (Score:2)
Re:You can start with the name (Score:1)
Why bother? Anyone deluded enough to think geeks will ever be in any way cool is destined to fail. I love their 'solution' - 'I know how to change the general publics opinion of us geeks as ivory towered computer obsessed losers with no life that live in their parents basement, we'll hold a contest involving computer networking, operating systems and systems administration where they can win scholarships (totally not a nerdy prize!!) and letters from politicians (everyone loves them!!)' Even the geekiest ubercybergeek knows a scholarship is the nerdiest nerd prize nerdable. Nerds.
Re:You can start with the name (Score:1)
This story reminds me of the Sliders episode (season 1?) where being a geek/nerd makes you a superstar. They even have sports where bonus points are scored for answering questions while shooting a ball into a hoop.
Re:You can start with the name (Score:5, Interesting)
Back to reality of course, the want to scam a bunch of really smart students who are most likely to be marketing resistant into believing they can be as 'cool' as their jock strap counter parts, even though career prospects means they'll be getting paid 1/10th as much, be shunned by mass media and women that pursue cash or fame will still have no interest in them.
Reality is, if they want to convince suitable types, they will have to convince them there is a solid well paying career. That they won't get dumped or their salary package screwed with by politicians, whenever it's politically convenient. That they will have a pleasant work environment and will not be stood over by administrative political appointees seeking to claim credit for the work and blame them for the idiot political appointees mistakes.
For the cybergeeks (argh, just die already) there are already very popular places to work for, be it google type private corporations, high tech corporations like boeing and when it comes to security, well, take your pick of multinational banks. If security is your thing not only will pay and conditions be far better at the banks but there are also many opportunities for overseas postings. Basically as you work your way through the list, only the anal left overs end up at government, except of course the main professionally paranoid government institutions which can still manage to snag a few top flight types.
Want to promote the security industry, then sponsor a TV series targeted at mid-teen sci fi types, that isn't dumbed down and creates a false 'er' exaggerated impression of career desirability. Sponsor computer games that also give a false 'er' exaggerated impression of rewards for security success.
Re:You can start with the name (Score:3)
Yeah, but you're telling the CYBER Foundation to stop putting "cyber" on everything. Do you really think they're gonna listen?
Re:You can start with the name (Score:1)
They can start with _their_ name.
Oh great, this thread again (Score:3)
Oh great, this thread again. Seems like every time a cyber word is used, a cyber-bully rears their head, and cyber-comments about how cyber shouldn't be used all the time. This always just turns into cyber-rage.
Stop cyber-hatin', and start cyber-lovin'!
Why? (Score:2)
Don't you want to be radical/rad. like CYBERjack2000? [grin]
Re:Why? (Score:2)
Dude, don't you know what happens when you type CYBERjack?
Cuz I don't but from the rumours it ai^X
NO CARRIER
Re:You can start with the name (Score:3)
I vote 'tech guys'
short
understandable
and guys is basically unisex now
Re:You can start with the name (Score:5, Interesting)
Technosapien?
Re:You can start with the name (Score:1)
Are you referring to this guy [blogspot.com]?
Re:You can start with the name (Score:2)
Are you referring to this guy [blogspot.com]?
Man, he may not by a xybernaught, but he sure looks like a space cadet!
Re:You can start with the name (Score:3)
THAT will be the major determining factor!!!
Re:You can start with the name (Score:2)
I heard the sorta-clever portmanteau "techsperts" once. It ain't TOO too bad and it's actually real ungendered instead of pretend.
Re:You can start with the name (Score:2)
I'm with you. "Cyber" used to mean something, man! When I was a lad, to "cyber" meant to masturbate while text-chatting with a man who is pretending to be a woman. It's time to take back "cyber!"
Yeah, right. (Score:1)
If geeks were cool they wouldn't be geeks. Part of being a geek is the whole uncoolness thing.
Re:Yeah, right. (Score:4, Insightful)
If geeks were cool they wouldn't be geeks. Part of being a geek is the whole uncoolness thing.
Besides which, "performing useful/important work" will disqualify you from being cool and popular. We'd rather pay people millions of dollars to chase a football around and thousands of dollars to secure vital infrastructure.
Our priorities are so fucked up like that. If we had severe natural selection competition from a competing species, we'd deserve to die out. We idolize and worship our most useless elements while oppressing and ridiculing our most useful.
Re:Yeah, right. (Score:1)
Re:Yeah, right. (Score:2)
THIS
Already cool (Score:5, Insightful)
Linus Torvalds is already cooler than any football player.
Re:Already cool (Score:3)
Re:Already cool (Score:2)
I believe Billy Joel is writing a song about Slashdot 3.0 entitled "The day the comments died".
Seriously, where the fuck did they go?
I've just gone through my settings, increasing any values which might give me more comments, but it still doesn't seem right.
Anyone know what has to be done to get comments back?
Slashdot needs to pay more attention to how comments work, since that's literally their best service. I can get day to year old articles and summaries many other places.
Re:Already cool (Score:2)
Back on 2.0 even with every setting set to show as many comments as possible and filter none at all slashdot would STILL automatically block a lot of comments, completely silently so the only way to find them was by clicking "parent" on a reply that was indented a little more than normal, and often for no reason at all since they weren't even modded down most of the time.
Odds are they just upped the ante on that game.
Re:Already cool (Score:1)
Nobody pays millions of dollars for 30 seconds of ad time during a Torvalds speech.
Re:Already cool (Score:1)
Nobody pays millions of dollars for 30 seconds of ad time during a Torvalds speech.
Nobody pays millions of dollars for 30 seconds of ad time during a Roger Goodell speech either.
The answer is clear -- Linuxians vs. GNUheads in Hacker Bowl 2011!
Re:Already cool (Score:1)
As cool as sports stars? (Score:3)
Sports stars, sadly, are often rich, objectifying substance abusers. While some few compete legitimately and are gentlemen, most do not embody fair competition or the kind of behavior that I, at least, think we should be encouraging in our communities, our nation, or our species. Shouldn't our real objective be to teach that accomplishments and respect for others are what make people cool, rather than to make one group cool by heightening their profile?
Re:As cool as sports stars? (Score:2)
Re:As cool as sports stars? (Score:1)
You have your most and often backwards.
Dont forget you will almost never here of someone being kind a friendly. AS soon as one gets drun in public it's palstered all of the media.
Re:As cool as sports stars? (Score:2)
He has "netfo dna tsom"?
Re:As cool as sports stars? (Score:2)
i, for one, would take my millions and go party where nobody knows me, or they don't have cameras.
but then, these people would be ordinary people and thus not have the same pulling power. if they were competing for a girl with julian assange, he'd probably get her.
Re:As cool as sports stars? (Score:2)
Re:As cool as sports stars? (Score:1)
Re:As cool as sports stars? (Score:2)
Balls to that. They're paid based on how vital they are to an organization for whom they demonstrably make much, much more money than they're paid. Professional athletes are, in most cases, rather underpaid in comparison to the amount of money that they make for their bosses.
CSA's? Cool? (Score:1)
Like any true athlete, the joy should be in the sport, not the glory.
That's nice, but (Score:5, Insightful)
But postage aside, we really end up - consciously or not - marginalizing scientists in our country. We don't give them the prestige they deserve, and we make them fight like American Idol contestants (to say nothing of the fact that many people can name more living Idol contestants than living scientists) for the kind of money that professional athletes would laugh at. Other countries hold their top researchers in great prestige; this may end up being just another sign of the decay of our empire here.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
Now you've seen lots [google.com]. There were at least two in the US.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
True, but I didn't see any Michael Vick, Brett Farve (though there is a 33 cent Green Bay stamp), or LeBron James stamps for that matter.
However, there is a Feynman stamp, a von Neumann stamp, a Josiah Willard Gibbs stamp, a Barbara McClintock stamp, John James Audubon, Dr. Crawford W. Long, Luther Burbank, Dr. Walter Reed, Jane Addams, and educators such as Horace Mann, Mark Hopkins, Charles Elliot, Frances E. Willard, Booker T. Washington, inventors such as Eli Whitney, Samuel F. B. Morse, Cyrus Hall McCormick, Elias Howe, Alexander Graham Bell, and crossover scientist/inventor/educator George Washington Carver.
Athletes found in this list [wikipedia.org] are limited to Ray Ewry, Jesse Owens (definitely worth IMHO), Wilma Rudolph, and Babe Zaharias.
It seems US postage stamps are the last bastion of honoring the merits of scientists and educators here in the US. I do agree that as a society we have our priorities all wrong though.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
or how about tesla on currency? http://www.teslasociety.com/various_tesla.htm [teslasociety.com]
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
I thought about doing a kickstarter project to collect $50-100K to do billboard adds in Chicago, LA, and NY with various high-profile scientists, their name, and a small snip next to their name regarding what they do (think Intel's "Our rockstars aren't your rockstars" commerical). Haven't gotten around to it though.
I don't have a problem with athletes. I have a problem with (and find it disgusting) how much they're paid and praised to entertain compared to those who are working for peanuts saving lives/the world.
To quote XKCD, "Science, it works bitches."
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
I thought about doing a kickstarter project to collect $50-100K to do billboard adds in Chicago, LA, and NY with various high-profile scientists, their name, and a small snip next to their name regarding what they do (think Intel's "Our rockstars aren't your rockstars" commerical). Haven't gotten around to it though.
My only concern with that approach is that it would be like giving people who are vehemently opposed to specific research disciplines their own hit lists. I once worked near a lab where some nutjob scaled the (18 story!) building to hang a tent off of so he could camp out in protest of (his misinformation on) animal research that was (not) being done in that building. Eventually we had to get the fire department (who later proclaimed that they would have never considered his equipment safe) to lower him down safely after he had lost too much strength from his hunger strike.
Then imagine if you put up a billboard that showed a researcher and said "human stem cell research"; you would probably need to hire security for that person afterwards, or pay for them to find a new identity.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
Maybe stick to generic definitions? "Curing Cancer", "Solving energy problems", and so forth. I am, indeed, very open to ideas before pursuing this.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:1)
That's like saying you shouldn't advertise athletes because readers/seers may be from a rival team...the number of people so opposed to care to do physical damage are much less than those who wouldn't.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:3, Interesting)
Just from last year's stamps alone in the UK --
Boyle, Newton, Franklin, Babbage, Rutherford: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=115800796&mediaId=116600770 [royalmail.com]
Flemming, Ross, Hounsfield: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=127200772&mediaId=128800767 [royalmail.com]
Darwin: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=91400755&mediaId=91500749 [royalmail.com]
Watt, Stephenson, McAdam: http://www.royalmail.com/portal/stamps/content1?catId=93000750&mediaId=93000754 [royalmail.com]
Re:That's nice, but (Score:3, Funny)
Hell yeah! Now science will be the latest fad with the stamp collecting crowd, bringing us cybergeeks into the spotlight! Finally we get recognition from those cool, trendy, hip & streetwise philatelists!
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
Who uses stamps nowadays?
I'm for it, but I can't tell you the last time I used or even saw a stamp.
[John]
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
A week ago I posted a concert ticket to my brother. 1 stamp.
Yesterday I stuck 4 on a parcel (sold something on eBay). It's more convenient than paying for postage online, and much more convenient than going to the post office.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:3)
we really end up - consciously or not - marginalizing scientists in our country.
Indeed, I have even heard it said, possibly here on Slashdot but I'm not sure, that pursuing a career in science is similar in some respects to entering the priesthood. In order to do either, one must make a serious long term commitment, and one not easily broken, to a job which requires nearly complete devotion to the work and lifestyle at relatively low rates of remuneration. It takes a certain kind of person, whether priest or scientist, to make that sort of long term commitment to advance in their chosen profession. Many people who could do science chose instead to do something else because the sheer levels of commitment and mental effort involved are just too harsh to seriously contemplate as a profession without relatively comparable compensation, advancement prospects or job security. They may remain interested in scientific and technical topics as a hobby or side interest, but they choose a different way of earning their living.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
You mean all those scientists working in the research departments of Shell and Pfizer and Nichia and almost every tech company out there? It's not all engineers you know. And many of the engineers are doing work comparable to that of the scientists.
xkcd 664 [xkcd.com] springs to mind.
Re:Einstein Stamps (Score:1)
Actually a lot of countries did put out Einstein stamps, even the US did at least twice according to my quick Cyber Googling, 8 and 15 cents. Mickey Mouse probably has more lobbying clout in Washington nowadays, it's either this or somebody has a cyber string theory agenda.
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
Yeah athletes get paid a ton, but they entertain millions and there are not very many. It's like winning the lottery.
Anyway, go scientists!
Re:That's nice, but (Score:2)
They seem to be confused... (Score:1)
The only "cyber-skilled" (that word if from tfa, not my creation) high schoolers I can think of that would be interested in this competition, and in being cool for their leet security skills are the same people frequenting 4chan... They have plenty of experience with LOIC ddos tools, but I somehow doubt they are going to be viable candidates long term.
If the gov wants more "world class" security professionals how about offer some free training to those already established in the field. Oh and offer pay that is competitive with the industry.
Re:They seem to be confused... (Score:1)
Well, it's all noobish, csa stuff, the thing you can learn from reading the manual after 5 seconds.
Geeks should stay "geeks". (Score:1)
I don't give a fuck what the jock-worshippers I already despise think so long as they stay out of my way.
I don't WANT every dumbshit out there to be a wannabe geek. We don't need to flood the market, we don't need any more noobs.
Exclusivity benefits people who provide services, be they a pipe weldor or a geek. Barriers to entry are fine.
Re:Geeks should stay "geeks". (Score:3)
Re:Geeks should stay "geeks". (Score:2)
Regarding attempts to flood self-selected groups with noobs, fuck yes I'm bitter. It just pollutes (groups) with non-serious people and adds noise.
Remember when Slashdot wasn't just 4chan with a green color scheme?
No wedgie though. Underwear is just a way to turn perfectly good white fabric brown and yellow.
Re:Geeks should stay "geeks". (Score:2)
Seriously dude, listen to yourself. You come off as a parody of the vicious nerd that everyone knew in high school, ranting about noobs and jocks-- and that's just embarrassing. Tragic, at worst.
Your example is ridiculous as well, I'm afraid: pipefitters deal in tangible structures, and it's much cheaper to engage one that's local to your project; coders can work from virtually anywhere. When demand outstrips supply, companies aren't going to offer blank checks to angry, entitled, self-styled geeks: they're going to hire coding houses in China or India, where people have realized that's where the money is currently, and aren't so wrapped up in their high school identities.
Re:Geeks should stay "geeks". (Score:1)
Party like... (Score:1)
It's about damn time!!! (Score:3)
That's fine and all but.... (Score:2)
making a high school aged competition won't make security "cool" any more than spelling bee's make good spelling cool, or academic quiz teams made academics cool.
Just because you got some high schoolers involved in a competition doesn't mean something is now "cool", and no, letters from congressmen or navy scholarships don't make things cool either.
This just shows a lack of understanding as to why people idolize sports/entertainment stars.
Re:That's fine and all but.... (Score:2)
Just because you got some high schoolers involved in a competition doesn't mean something is now "cool", and no, letters from congressmen or navy scholarships don't make things cool either.
This just shows a lack of understanding as to why people idolize sports/entertainment stars.
Well the letters aren't really that cool per-se but a full ride scholarship is. That is actually a lot of money and if you don't need to spend any money on school, it means while in school any money you earn you can spend on whatever you like. And when you graduate you will be part of the minority that don't have student loans to pay off.
People idolize sports and entertainment stars because they are famous and rich. This competition probably won't give you much fame but it will make you rich in the sense that you won't go massively into debt paying for school like your peers. And really I think it is much better to be rich than famous.
Re:That's fine and all but.... (Score:3)
I got several full ride scholarships while I was in high school. And I'm pretty sure winning them didn't make me any cooler with any clique in high school but my own.
I also don't think the wealth is why people idolize sports and entertainment stars today, not that it isn't a factor, but there is money in plenty of professions where people aren't idolized. I think it's more the attention and in many cases respect, but they get attention and respect because people idolize them, which is leading me around kinda recursively.
The question I have is how did the entire industry go from being disrespected to being respected. That process could probably be the subject of an entire book that I wish I could read. I think it was partially due to the news looking for something to talk about, partially due to people escaping bad times by living vicariously through stories and games so they can taste a bit of victory and joy in their otherwise drab lives. There are probably plenty of other factors too that I'm not thinking of.
But whatever the change was, it wasn't from the changes of the attitudes of the kids but the attitudes of the adults that brought it about.
The "Special Olympics" - even if you win (Score:2)
Hint - if you do win, don't tell any women - The Big Bang Theory is not a reality TV show.
Re:The "Special Olympics" - even if you win (Score:1)
But if he HAD, he would have been correct.
Q: What's worse than entering the geek olympics?
A: Winning the geek olympics.
Q. What's worse than winning the geek olympics?
A: Bragging about winning the geek olympics.
Q. What;s worse than bragging about winning the geek olympics?
A. Passing the drug test afterward so you can't claim you were bombed out of your gourd and entered it as a joke.
Q. What's worse than passing the drug test afterward so you can't claim you were bombed out of your gourd and entered it as a joke?
A. Not a whole heck of a lot.
Q. At the first geek olympics, the two finalists had to get from the top of a tall building to the ground as fast as possible. They both jumped. Who hit the ground first?
A. Who gives a ****?
Seriously, there is no such thing as geek chic. Not in the real world. You can be a programmer without being a geek, without being a social misfit who can't talk about common everyday events with "the normals", without dividing the world into geeks and "the normals", without taking a perverse pride in self-diagnosed aspergers so you can continue to think that being an antisocial introverted jerk somehow makes you "special".
Even the kids who rode the short bus knew better. And they're often more interesting to talk with.
Geek Chic is as dead as Windows Phone 7. It's as uncool as saying you work for Microsoft in a room full of googlers. It's like saying you bought a zune because it's so cool. Or bragging that you haven't had a shower or bath in 5 days because you were too busy coding ... and nobody noticed anything different about you because you always smell like oka cheese and you always wear the same grungy black metal t-shirt for 5 days straight - but one person did note that you finally no longer looked like you had tghe worst case of bed head.
The geek olympics ... when being "special" is not enough :-)
Sure, let's make everything as cool as rockstars (Score:1)
For once, should we not stick with just plain simple friendly neighborhood rocket-scientist?
F* that. (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm sick of this self-perpetuating bullshit that says geeks can't be athletic or interesting or cool (where "cool" means relatively unconcerned about what other people think about them) . Geeks are fascinating. They travel. They build things. They do interesting things with electricity and power motors. They make films, design cars, hike volcanoes, enter sporting events.
Being socially inept does not make one a geek. Certainly some geeks could give a rat's ass about how they appear to others, so they come off as anti-social, but that's often by choice. Boring chatter about the weather and the local sports team is fine, but boring is boring, and geeks often have better things to do.
Being non-athletic does not make one a geek. Yes, many geeks associate working out with some desperate attempt to impress others or the opposite sex (or the same sex if you swing that way) and just say no, but who can blame them?
I may or may not be a geek, who the hell knows or cares. But I do know that labels are a sad attempt to compartmentalize *people*.
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
(where "cool" means relatively unconcerned about what other people think about them)
Certainly some geeks could give a rat's ass about how they appear to others, so they come off as anti-social, but that's often by choice
I like how in the same post you say cool people don't care about what other people think about them. And you also say that not caring about what other people think is anti-social
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
"Cool" doesn't mean "relatively unconcerned about what people think about them". Lots of geeks have that. For a person to be "cool" means "people think well of them and would wish to be like them", though in a more specific sense. Of the things you've mentioned, I've travelled, hiked a volcano, and entered (and done well at) sporting events -- and non-geeks often think those things are "cool". But those aren't geeky things; those are just things this geek has happened to do. The geeky things I do generally are met with either blank looks or eye-rolls from non-geeks; building a Mythbox is probably the most likely to be "cool" to non-geeks once explained, and writing a MDL interpreter in order to play the original Zork is probably among the least.
Of course not, and more to the point, being a geek doesn't require one be socially inept, but it tends to come with the territory; geeks who are highly socially skilled in larger society are the exception rather than the rule.
Such compartmentalization can be quite useful.
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
Certainly some geeks could give a rat's ass about how they appear to others, so they come off as anti-social, but that's often by choice.
Funny thing is, if they choose to be social, then a geek would probably hit the mark. I've seen some friends of mine turn 30 and say, "I'm sick of this life as a single, I'm going out". Took a bunch of books on socializing, being yourself around women, etc, and they broke the code. They either have strained backs/hips or have found a woman for a stable relationship.
I'm convinced that geeks, who often have enough intelligence, can learn social skills very easily just by checking the available documentation.
Re:F* that. (Score:1)
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
All the latest material by David DeAngelo is very good. It's available on torrent sites, if you're tight on money. He had a name as a "pick up artist", i.e. stupid, manipulative tricks instead of honest character building, but that's not the case anymore. The stuff by Love Systems is very good too, with a systematical approach that suits me (as a geek) perfectly. Their guide is called Magic Bullets [lovesystems.com] and basically it's a step-by-step guide. If you need a hand, check out the forums at The Attraction Forums [theattractionforums.com].
If you're a USian, there are a lot of master classes which take you by the hand and teach you all the social skills you need. They're given either by one of the above mentioned parties, or any number of small businesses that are in this market too.
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
Guys,
I really cannot understand this. How come that anybody on this planet needs courses in interpersonal skills (ok, anybody who is more or less healthy and sane)? I mean, if there is anything that separates us from the other animals, it our ability to socialize. Mammals are the champions of cooperation and socializing (social insects, I know, but there the cooperation is largely due to them being closely linked genetically) and among them Homo Sapiens is by far the most advance. Those things come absolutely naturally for us. Communication skills are absolutely essential for survival and procreation, especially in this day and age.
I’ll tell you anecdotal evidence. IMO, it pays big deal if the mother plays substantial role in the upbringing of her son(s). It seems that a boy brought up in all-macho environment having his brother(s)/father as a role model under develops its communication skills and emphatic ability. It is difficult for such boy to understand women.
Conversely, a girl brought up exclusively by women under develops logic, reason and certain technical affinity that can prove very useful even if the girl becomes ballet dancer and never needs to hold screwdriver. Such girl will have a problem understanding men.
Not exactly brilliant revelation here, but so far my life experience shows that the above is very significant.
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
It would be interesting to dive into research, to see what factors in upbringing influence social skills. Must be there somewhere.
Your anecdotal evidence sounds logical, and I could agree but in the meantime, I think that your character as given by nature (not nurture) plays a big role here, too. I'm not too heavy on the more 'manly' qualities, after having done a few psychological tests.
I felt it was hard to make bold moves, to get the women that I wanted. The available documentation shows that's only natural, and the latest evolutionary psychology provides good explanations. That was just the thing I needed to walk up to my current girlfriend and show her who's daddy :-)
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
It's just like any other skill. You have to learn it. Yes, childhood experiences can make it a lot easier, but you usually don't have a lot of control over that, and not everyone was brought up in a traditional family. Just like a jock could pick up a book and work hard to become a programmer, so can a geek pick up a book and work hard to become popular. It's never too late to learn something new.
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
I agree there's lots of creepy stuff out there. That's why I recommended DeAngelo's latest stuff. He's much more on the "good" side of the equation. He's done a couple of items together with Dr. Paul Dobransky, who's got a really theoretical/schematical angle on psychology.
The creepy stuff mainly comes from the immature guys out there. I've been to a seminar organized by the Love Systems people. Nice guys, but in the audience were a bunch of 20-year-olds asking creepy and weird questions. "How do I get laid in the bathroom of a club". They answered the questions, but followed up with "but why would you want to do that?"
I've seen it done right by friends. Below the surface, there's basically the quest for a nice woman to love and hold, not to keep horsing around for the rest of their lives.
Re:F* that. (Score:1)
I'm a pentester and the lead maintainer of a pentest Linux distro based on gnome: gnacktrack.co.uk [slashdot.org]........
Yet i also train in MMA daily and although what the Americans would term as a Rookie, i am yet to loose at the standard i'm fighting. I would say i'm both a geek and cool.
Re:F* that. (Score:1)
Re:F* that. (Score:2)
I've run a mile faster than .01% of the world's population
Impressive.
Mr. Uncool (Score:1)
Re:Mr. Uncool (Score:1)
By saying that you "seek to be uncool", you prove that you DO care about the what world want/think.
I knew it, geeks are just wannabe nerds... You geeks are ruining our authenticity!
Not science (Score:1)
This is a competition based upon skills in using consumer electronics, not science or engineering.
About damn time... (Score:3)
More like XylonGeeks (Score:1)
There's CYBERgeeks now? Damn I'm off the pace.
Honestly, apart from the obvious misconceptions, did the eds read the post at all?
It's the same as it always been. (Score:2)
Step one: bathe on a regular basis, as in daily, this includes brushing one's teeth.
Step two: include activities that might occassional result in eposure to UV and body perspiration (see step one).
Step three: partake in tribal ritual known as social drinking with people outside one's immediate peer group.
Step three.one: wear a shirt to said social gathering, that has buttons, is not black, and does not have a saying on it that only anime/manga fans would get.
Step four: save the high brow subjects for those who can apreciated them, such as in who shot first Han or Greedo or how string theory is important to our daily lives.
Step five: Go back to step one and repete.
Re:It's the same as it always been. (Score:1)
We are more suited to distinguishing ourselves from the masses with silly jokes and dooming ourselves to our little social niche because let's face it, the conversations are just so much more interesting over here.
Come to the nerd side, we have pocket-protectors.
Re:It's the same as it always been. (Score:2)
I do give you big props for properly following the logic tree even though the program is flawed!
Wrong approach... (Score:2)
... if you want to to shine up geeks image you want to help those who are mocked, who don't care about their appearance or social skills and rather focus on making them better people all around.
The real issue is the nerds/geeks people hate give those nerds/geeks who are not like the ones people hate a bad name.
You're never going to get rid o the stigma of geek/nerd = socially inept loser obsessed with difficult stuff, people always want a punching bag and someone to look down on, the only way to counter that is to show how people can become better people all around rather then trying to make something appealing through contest, make them *actually likable human beings* would be a start.
Most people are incredibly stupid, emotional and superficial and only value geek/nerd for his or her own knowledge, we tend to be sought to be used rather then to be associated with.
Rated Cool By US Government (Score:3)
windmills do not work that way! (Score:1)
Tired-ass people trying to warm-over some tired-ass bullshit from the 90's tech glory days.
That's what the hell this is.
You know what makes you "cool"?
Providing a lot of value to one group of people, and being idolized by a second, lower status group of people who wish they could do the same.
That's all.
Make some soul-less executive motherfuckers (who don't even remotely understand what the fuck you're doing) very rich, inspire n00bs just coming into the workforce to do the same ... presto, you're fuckin' cool.
I've had it with this whole "geek" thing really. I kinda bought into it when I was 23, just starting out, and the thought of working 14 hour days every damn day, including the weekends because I was *so dedicated to this awesome thing I was building* seemed romantic; glamorous in a way. All that 90's / early 2000's media sure re-enforced the notion.
Here's the thing. I wasn't "cool" I was just another cog in the system. All that effort and dedication? It didn't mean a damn thing to anyone but me, and in the end, I made other people a lot of money and didn't get too much out of it myself, other than the satisfaction of building some really neat shit that belonged to other people who didn't give a damn after a year or two.
So you know what? "CyberGeeks" don't SEEM cool because they AREN'T cool. They only ever WERE cool via means of self-delusion and propaganda.
Being the very best worker in a sweatshop isn't "cool", it just is what it is.
Dedicate yourself to something you love, and don't do it for any other reason than that. ... great. If not ... fuck 'em, they're not even part of the equation in the first place.
If other people think it's "cool"
Re:windmills do not work that way! (Score:2)
I've had it with this whole "geek" thing really. I kinda bought into it when I was 23, just starting out, and the thought of working 14 hour days every damn day, including the weekends because I was *so dedicated to this awesome thing I was building* seemed romantic; glamorous in a way. All that 90's / early 2000's media sure re-enforced the notion.
Here's the thing. I wasn't "cool" I was just another cog in the system. All that effort and dedication? It didn't mean a damn thing to anyone but me, and in the end, I made other people a lot of money and didn't get too much out of it myself, other than the satisfaction of building some really neat shit that belonged to other people who didn't give a damn after a year or two.
This. For these reasons I've been thinking of getting out of IT entirely, xkcd 664 [xkcd.com] says it all. Seems like a better hobby than career. The problem is there aren't many other things I'm good at :-(
Re:FANTASTIC!!!! (Score:1)
Re:Statistician tries to make outliers common (Score:2)
Let's just play up the cyber=cybersex angle. The word will be gone within a week. That or geeks will forever be linked with sex. Either way works for me.