Professor Rejects Camera Implanted In His Head 138
Stenchwarrior writes "A New York University professor temporarily removed the camera he had surgically installed in the back of his head to get rid of one of the apparatus' parts after his body rejected it, myFOXny.com reported Wednesday. Photography professor Wafaa Bilal was in near constant pain after part of a thumb-nail-size camera, implanted in December as part of an art project commissioned by a new museum in Qatar, was rejected by his body."
Stupid art tricks (Score:5, Interesting)
This is right up there with locking yourself in a cage for month - a totally meaningless, useless trick meant only to get attention.
Re:Stupid art tricks (Score:4, Interesting)
Yeah, I totally agree. I mean, I'm clearly no art critic and claim no deep understanding of art, but what does this bring as "art"? This brings no insights and adds nothing. And frankly, the fact that it's funded by a new museum in Qatar makes it worse in my eyes. Places like Qatar and Abu Dhabi have demonstrated that they have more money than sense for decades, building one extravagant, useless building after another. This "art" project is about as artful as having a toddler splatter his spaghetti on a canvas.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Why didn't he wear a strap on? (Score:4, Interesting)
Did it never occur to him to just strap a camera to his head? Or just wear a hat with a camera on. Methinks that the main reason for having this implanted was to generate publicity for this project.
I think you nailed it. Only an attention whore would do this and it sounds like the bugger got his attention too. And a septic head.