Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Star Wars Prequels Idle

The Science of Lightsabers 232

sethmad writes "As everyone who's ever passed the GRE knows, there are two major hypothetical operational problems with Star Wars lightsabers. More accurately I should say there were two problems, because I solved both of them."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Science of Lightsabers

Comments Filter:
  • by Zakabog ( 603757 ) <john&jmaug,com> on Friday June 10, 2011 @01:15PM (#36402882)

    If you're using a magnetic field to control the plasma then any magnet can still interfere with the light saber. For some reason I was expecting a much more technical article than 'its got a metal rod in the center, tada!'

  • by larry bagina ( 561269 ) on Friday June 10, 2011 @01:17PM (#36402932) Journal
    Yeah, this was stupid and pointless, even by idle standards. Maybe /. needs to add a retarded section.
  • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 ) on Friday June 10, 2011 @01:19PM (#36402944)

    Come on. Half the comments on this story are probably going to be better than this dork's.

    A light saber that used plasma would likely be hot. Hot enough that holding it would get very uncomfortable, magnetic field or no. And if the magnetic field is confining it, how does it get through the porous metal? Without destroying the metal? Where does the plasma come from if it's constantly leaking out? Why do lightsabers require focusing gems? How does a light saber deflect blaster and laser hits that would otherwise melt metal? How can lightsabers be an ancient weapon and the guy who designed them is still living on some planet somewhere?

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...