Best Buy Flexes Legal Muscles Over "Geek" 317
siliconbits writes "US Electronics retailer Best Buy has been slow but steady in the fight to protect its Geek Squad trademark, but some are wondering whether the 800-lb gorilla of the tech retailing sector is going too far in its war to right some wrongs. The word 'Geek' is a century-old word that used to mean 'fool' or 'crazy,' but has, since the beginning of the 1980s, been associated with fans of technology in general and computers in particular. That hasn't prevented a number of geek-themed companies from being hit by Best Buy's legal team over the last decade, including Geek Housecalls, Rent a Geek, Geek Rescue, Speak with A Geek and, not surprisingly, arch-rival Newegg."
Typical (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure if their case is correct, but all the groups listed in the summary aren't just using "geek". They are using it in conjunction with tech support.
"Geek Housecalls, Rent a Geek, Geek Rescue, Speak with A Geek"
Re:Typical (Score:5, Insightful)
So? "Geek" is a common term to describe, well, geeks. So to use the term "geek" as part of the name of a company or service that gives tech support to end users makes a lot of sense and I just don't see how it can be a protected term.
Re: (Score:3)
What the hell are you talking about? Geeks lack some social skills but compensate for knowing interesting/fun ways to use gadgets. Nerds have no social skills even when pressing their noses against computers.
In the social ladder Geeks > Nerds. You're thinking of spazzes.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nah there's an easier test.
Geeks have severe acne. Nerds don't.
Re: (Score:2)
Geeks have severe acne. Nerds don't.
Are you serious?
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Authoritative nerd-geek-dork Venn Diagram [buzzfeed.com].
Even more authoritative nerd-geek-dork Venn Diagram [xkcd.com].
Re:Typical (Score:5, Funny)
It was ruled false advertising.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, I had a mod point left, where'd it go? You need a "funny" mod. I don't have any trouble attracting the opposite sex (but the meme is funny).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
No. He sells computers and *thinks* he's a geek. He wears a polo shirt with the company logo, but his headset is too tight.
Re: (Score:2)
Although I agree that the meme is funny, given that slashdot has a large population it is inevitable that some of us will be what society considers "attractive". But maybe our less attractive brethren think that this very trait invalidates our geek credibility.
But then, no one wants to hear an attractive person bitch about double-standards...because most of them are positive.
Re: (Score:3)
Going to the red-light district with cash in your pocket doesn't count.
Re: (Score:2)
Or like Microsoft trademarking the word "Windows" in reference to their windowed application operating system/environment! That would never fly, Right?
Re:Typical (Score:5, Informative)
> Or like Microsoft trademarking the word "Windows" in reference to their windowed
> application operating system/environment! That would never fly, Right?
Actually, IIRC, they were originally granted a trademark on "Windows" and "Word", but they chose to sue the wrong people (who had mega-$$) and they lost those trademarks --- IMO, they only have a (US) trademark now on "Microsoft Windows" and "Microsoft Word", not on the bare words, no matter what the context.
< checks WP >
No, they only practically lost the bare word Windows --- they bailed out of the litigation before the judge could rule it was invalid [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:3)
Frankly... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
The Nerd-Herd?
Re: (Score:3)
I've never been to Best Buy but from what I understand the "Geek Squad" appears to be filled with questionably-technology-adept social enthusiasts. And even then, the social part is possibly a stretch.
Re:Frankly... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Some of us still consider geek and nerd to be insulting regardless of the context.
Oh boo hoo. Geek isn't an insult anymore and PC means Windows. Welcome to life after the year 2000.
Re: (Score:2)
But you're free to hate, I guess
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Geek Squad was from what I understand actually fairly helpful prior to being taken over by BestBuy. These days though, they're more known for stealing porn from consumers and general ineptitude. 9 Confessions Of A Former Geek Squad Geek [consumerist.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Frankly... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Frankly... (Score:4, Informative)
Based on anecdotal evidence found on the web - that is no longer true. It seems that the "geeks" have been put out to pasture, and Best Buy has hired "sales" people to replace them. Today, calling the "Geek Squad" means some sales oriented person comes to your house, runs some automated software to clean up viral infestations, and to find obvious hardware and software problems. Based on what he finds, that sales person then offers all sorts of (possibly un-) necessary hardware, software, and/or services. Geek Squad members are graded on the sales they make, rather than the computers they fix.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe it's changed in the last two years, but when I bought a laptop at Best Buy (they actually had the best deal around) all they had left was one with Geek Squad stuff already installed. Since I didn't need or want the software, they simply changed the SKU for me and asked me to remove the software.
Re: (Score:2)
So, went back much later, collected the laptop, saw it still had crapware on it but in evaluation mode, so wiped it flat.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're too educated on technology, they're worried you'll be a bad sales person because you're likely to have a bad attatch rate. You might be able to direct a customer to the laptop that meets their needs, but when it only has a VGA port, you're not likely to atttach a $300 HDMI cable to the purchase. The more ignorant you are about what they sell, the better your attach rates are going to be as a sales person, because you're more likely to attatch the shiney rather than the applicable. And many Best Bu
Use in Commerce (Score:5, Informative)
Note: this doesn't mean it's a slam dunk for Best Buy... Newegg's defense is that "geek" is a generic term, and it could well be. The point is just that trademarks only apply to commercial speech.
Re: (Score:3)
"*This product is not manufactured or distributed by $COMPANY owner of the registered trademark $PRODUCT(r)."
If they can establish that the competing service is using a name(or name/branding/color scheme/etc. of which the Geek Squad has a fairly well-developed, if hideous, flavor)
Re:Use in Commerce (Score:4, Informative)
If they can establish that the competing service is using a name(or name/branding/color scheme/etc. of which the Geek Squad has a fairly well-developed, if hideous, flavor) calculated to deceive the customer, the competing service is in for a world of hurt. If, on the other hand, "geeks" are a generic category of technical service providers, "Rent A Geek" and "Geek Squad" sound pretty much nothing alike. If an orange and black car containing a "Squad o'Geeks" wearing goofy uniforms pulls up, though, game over...
Well, there's part of the problem... Newegg put up a television add with a big electronics store and a guy in a blue polo shirt fixing computers, and they use black and orange colors in the logo.
Also, the fact that "Rent a Geek" and "Geek Squad" sound nothing alike isn't that relevant... You don't have to directly confuse the two marks - rather, the test for infringement is whether a reasonable person would think that "Rent a Geek" refers to or associated with Best Buy's service.
And finally, remember that the "reasonable person" is one in the market. No Slashdot person would confuse Best Buy and Newegg, or Geek Squad and Rent a Geek... but we also wouldn't be caught dead using those services. Your 80 year old grandmother who wants the emails and the 3Gs to send an internets to her grandkid is the relevant market, and you can bet she's going to be confused between Geek On and Geek Squad, particularly if they're both in blue polos with orange and black logos.
Re:Use in Commerce (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes but that particular test is faulty because you can find "a" person who "doesn't give a shit and just wants this shit fixed" in 90% of the market. 90% of the market is not reasonable. 90% of the market that shows up at Best Buy's Geek Squad will think the Genius Bar at Apple is the same thing... Geek Squad, Geek Bar, whatever.
By the way, Best Buy says (internally--this is company proprietary information) that Geek Squad's revenue is supposed to be about 80%; however, each Geek Squad "Agent" gets paid $10.50-ish an hour, maybe $15/hour in the upper tiers, more for out-of-store service. In-store is 80%, which means a revenue of 5 times the $84/day you make, or $420/day in services sold. In truth, however, they push for around $200/hour or about $1600/day.
Think about it. If it's slow up front, one machine an hour is a $60 "diagnostic" service, already breaking (at $10.50/hr) the $52.50 you need to make. While there's no customers, you do all the bench work; it's minimal. Now, diagnostic is mandatory (if you come in saying "I have a virus" it's "We must do a diagnostic, $60"), but I *think* the actual repair is discounted ... so if it's a $30 repair, you pay $60 total.
But that'll get you in a load of trouble (I know, I was fired for minimizing profits), so what normally happens is they run the anti-virus installed and it can't remove a virus (funny) or otherwise doesn't fix the problem. Then they tell you, $70 to back up any files, $60 to re-install the OS, $30 to run Windows Update and apply all patches, $30 per software package (Anti-virus, Anti-Spyware, Office) being installed... totals out to a good $250, plus the original repair, over $300 for one customer.
I used to peer at the output and notice what was being found "protected" and irreparable; when you reboot, that file is encrypted and can't be scanned by the offline virus scanner, so it misses the virus. But since the online scanner told you it's in C:\Program Files\Common Files\wx3pd12.exe ... you go rename it to .ex_ and reboot. System works? Remove the file. Problem solved, and you just saved the customer $250 with 5 minutes of extra work. Now your supervisor is pissed and you get fired.
Re: (Score:3)
Apparently you did not watch the video in the article (which isn't a surprise since odds are you didn't read the story). The commercial shows a box store salesperson in a blue polo taking the camera (the customer) to the laptop sales section. The customer asks the simple question, "What's the difference between the two" and the rest of the commercial is watching the salesperson struggle to answer the question. There is absolutely zero mention of Geek Squad, and the word Geek would not be in the commercia
Re: (Score:2)
My tagline can be: Growing Innovation Depends on your Core
Re:Use in Commerce (Score:5, Informative)
Apple is also a generic term, being the name of a fruit. How about I try to set up a computer company using it? I could use some new innovative core design and call my company Apple-core.
Apple is a generic term for apples. It's not a generic term for anything else. Specifically with regard to Apple Computers, it's an arbitrary term, which is one of the strongest protected categories of trademarks. More info here [veritrademark.net] or here [bitlaw.com], essentially layman's guides to the Federal Circuit decision in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. vs. Hunting World, Inc.
Re: (Score:2)
Geek is also a generic term for fool or crazy, which has been specifically used in this case (since 1980s) to refer to people of a technical, but not so social, persuasion.
So Apples are generic for fruit, but specific for a certain computer firm. I'm not against trademarking, I'm quite certain that Best Buy will come out the victor here, I just think that Newegg's defense is somewhat naive. They are hoping to use the "big evil
Re: (Score:2)
>>Specifically with regard to Apple Computers, it's an arbitrary term
Geek is a term for people who like computers and other nerdy things. It would be like Best Buy trying to trademark "The Computer Guys". I.e., I don't think they can. But it depends on how much money Newegg has for lawyers, I guess.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And the term "Geek" had been used in commerce, in the same industry, for years if not decades before Worst Buy stole the term and started their Geek Squad.
Doesn't matter... There's no such thing as prior art in trademark law - only if there's someone else currently using the mark.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are correct, there is no such thing as "prior ART" but there is such a thing as "prior and still currently using the mark" which is what I was talking about.
What, really? No, please, condescendingly explain more. Obviously, from my "only if there's someone else currently using the mark" statement I don't understand this concept of someone currently using the mark.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe not prior art, but you can't get trademark protection for "descriptive" marks.
Re: (Score:2)
Well see, since Best Buy's Geek Squad is actually a sales force, they aren't actually geeks so it isn't a descriptive mark... /s
Re: (Score:2)
Except that except for the fact that someone tried to turn it into a trademark ... the people doing the computer repair service were pre
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
but only the fully qualified name - ie Geek Squad is trademarked. Geek in and of itself, even in use by other technical specialists is not infringement.
Not necessarily, if Best Buy can show they have rights in the family mark - see the McDonalds v. McSleep and McDental cases.
Chances are if anyone confuses Speak with a Geek with Geek Squad, it's only going to improve their already shaky, shady reputation.
Possibly, but that doesn't matter... Trademarks are about consistent reputations, not stellar ones. McDonald's has craptastic food, but it's consistently craptastic. That's why it's got one of the strongest trademarks in the world.
Re: (Score:2)
The only thing horribly wrong is your understanding.
Trademarks do not need to contain or be made up of made-up words.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah a baseless assertion. How silly of me to think otherwise.
If trademarks overlap with ordinary English, injustice is sure to follow. The right of everyone to speak our language outweighs the narrow commercial interests of a single party. To avoid this, trademarks should not have any ordinary English meaning in the context that they are used.
E.G. "Geek Squad" is a descriptive term, and even people who have never heard of Best Buy would understand the phrase. That's a bad trademark. "Apple Computer" o
Re: (Score:2)
rubbish
Re: (Score:2)
rubbbish?
Re: (Score:2)
rub-a-dub-dubish!
Re: (Score:2)
No, the GP meant "rubish" - as in "similar to a Rube Goldberg [wikipedia.org] machine". Use in a sentence: "Best Buy's Geek Squad is rubish if their ultimate goal is to actually fix your computer, but confusingly direct if their goal is to generate income from anyone unfortunate enough to accidentally walk somewhere near to their counter, say, within three miles."
CompGeeks - now geeks.com (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
OTOH, perhaps they should be thankful that people are forgetting about them. I used to buy things from them in the past. But I stopped about the time they stopped posting full spec lists. I had to return several things in a row because they didn't get the spec list right, and much of what they were selling was unbadged or obscure.
I ended up not bothering to return the last one because after I paid for shipping all they were willing to give me was store credit that I wouldn't use because I had bought that it
Re: (Score:2)
let's get back to basics (Score:3)
http://youtu.be/JNM4atakanI [youtu.be]
Re:let's get back to basics (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Geeks are supposed to be crazed circus side show freaks that bite the heads off of chickens.
Ozzy Osbourne is not a geek.
Meanwhile, at Best Buy HQ (Score:3)
How far should common terms go? (Score:2, Interesting)
This really makes me wonder how far one should be allowed to use common terms. In this particular case, the argument is against the decades-old term "geek". How far should companies wanting to engage in commerce be allowed to take a trademark? To me, even the example of the word "geek" is ridiculous, but if you want the most extreme form of insanity when it comes to current copyright/trademark laws, iAnyone doesn't have to iLook any further than Apple, and their iMonopoly over a single letter. At what p
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This really makes me wonder how far one should be allowed to use common terms. In this particular case, the argument is against the decades-old term "geek". How far should companies wanting to engage in commerce be allowed to take a trademark? To me, even the example of the word "geek" is ridiculous, but if you want the most extreme form of insanity when it comes to current copyright/trademark laws, iAnyone doesn't have to iLook any further than Apple, and their iMonopoly over a single letter. At what point should we draw the line?
But Apple doesn't have a monopoly over the single letter (and, in fact, they haven't successfully asserted family rights in the i- prefix either yet). And "iPod" or "iMac" or "iCloud" certainly aren't common words.
Where should the line be drawn? It depends on the case. We can go as narrow as need be. If "geek" is a generic term and "squad" is generic, then what about "geek squad" together? No one but Best Buy is using that, so maybe we only give them protection over the combination, and "Geek On" or "Squa
Re: (Score:2)
...But Apple doesn't have a monopoly over the single letter (and, in fact, they haven't successfully asserted family rights in the i- prefix either yet). And "iPod" or "iMac" or "iCloud" certainly aren't common words.
Cloud is a very common word. Hell, the meaning of the word didn't even change within the context of networking. Add a single letter to it, and poof!, instant trademark that is almost immediately assumed associated with Apple? Sure smells like a single-letter monopoly to me.
I'll believe that they don't have a monopoly over a single letter used with something like the VERY generic word "cloud" when someone can sue them and actually win. Then I'll believe it. Until then, they DO have a monopoly if for no
Re: (Score:2)
...But Apple doesn't have a monopoly over the single letter (and, in fact, they haven't successfully asserted family rights in the i- prefix either yet). And "iPod" or "iMac" or "iCloud" certainly aren't common words.
Cloud is a very common word.
I know. That's why you'll notice that I said "iCloud".
Legally, a trademark must be viewed in its entirety. You can't excise part of a mark in order to claim that the remaining part is generic.
Re: (Score:2)
...But Apple doesn't have a monopoly over the single letter (and, in fact, they haven't successfully asserted family rights in the i- prefix either yet). And "iPod" or "iMac" or "iCloud" certainly aren't common words.
Cloud is a very common word.
I know. That's why you'll notice that I said "iCloud".
Legally, a trademark must be viewed in its entirety. You can't excise part of a mark in order to claim that the remaining part is generic.
I do understand what you are saying here. However, my point with Apple still stands. Say you were a small business called ICloud Networking, offering cloud DR services with an OSX app...and all of the sudden Apple chooses to start using "iCloud". While not an exact match, it's likely close enough to start crushing your business. You're a small business. Even though you might have a slam-dunk case, how much can you afford to go against Apple? Take a look at nissan.com...you'll notice that isn't Nissan
Re: (Score:2)
Say you were a small business called ICloud Networking, offering cloud DR services with an OSX app...and all of the sudden Apple chooses to start using "iCloud". While not an exact match, it's likely close enough to start crushing your business. You're a small business. Even though you might have a slam-dunk case, how much can you afford to go against Apple?
That's why, if you're smart, after you offer to settle with Apple, you approach Amazon and see if they want to pay for representation in your lawsuit in exchange for some or all of the proceeds, on the grounds that they might be interested in preventing Apple from obtaining the mark.
Re: (Score:3)
They Tarnish the name "Geek" (Score:5, Interesting)
If the "Geek Squad's" track record [geeksquadreviews.com] indicates anything, it is that they are not worthy of the title "geek" anything.
Anyone who brings their computer to Best Buy for service either 1) Has never brought their computer to best buy for service before, 2) Is too stupid to know any better, or 3) Have no friends who have even a remedial knowledge of IT.
Re: (Score:2)
Wasn't a "geek" originally a circus performer who attracted viewers with strange and disturbing activities like biting the heads off of live animals? What sort of activities would make someone unworthy of that title?
The Best Buy equivalent would be if you went to the Circus to see some "strange and disturbing activities like biting the heads off of live animals" but when you walked up to the tent they said "So it is going to cost you $80 to just have us tell you about the disturbing activities, which may not be accurate, and then you can decide if you want to contact us in about 2 weeks to find out if we've actually gotten around to biting the heads off of live animals or if we've just misplaced the animals and not act
Good thing Slashdot's safe... (Score:2)
I guess CmdrTaco had the wisdom to see this coming when he created a website with "News for Nerds." Just imagine what type of trouble /. would be in if it was "Gadgets for Geeks" or something along those lines!
How rentally metarded is that? (Score:3)
They only used "Geek Squad" because everybody already knew what it meant. Therefore, it's not theirs.
Wrong (Score:2)
It didn't mean "fool or crazy", a "geek" was someone who ate live animals. 1920s goldfish swallowers, for example.
correction - from 19th century (Score:3)
Picture of infringement (Score:4, Informative)
The title is misleading. Best Buy is defending uses of the word Geek in a context that can be confused with the brand Geek Squad.
Here is a photo of the alleged infringement. [ipbrief.net]
After looking at the logos, it doesn't look like Best Buy has much of a case. I don't see how a reasonable person can confuse the two usages.
Newegg is a rival to Best Buy? (Score:2)
Newegg dominates the shit out of Best Buy. Newegg is possibly the best computer / electronics retailer, while Best Buy is possibly the worst.
Big Box "Repair" Services (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate big box repair services so much.
I once had what seemed to be a dud power supply, and I went to the Circuit City near my house because I knew they would have something that would work to replace it. I also figured they would have one of those gadgets for testing power supplies. So I took the power supply out and headed over.
Their support desk said they really preferred to troubleshoot the whole computer, then suggested I go home, put the power supply back in the case, then bring the whole thing back in and pay them $100 just to look at it. I said "no, it's almost certainly just the power supply, just plug it into that thing" and pointed at the tester sitting on the table next to them. After some convincing the guy finally did, and that was when it got *super* scam-tastic.
Luckily I could look over the counter and see that not all the green lights were on when he said "nope, looks like it works fine." I asked him why the +12V rail light hadn't come on, and he tried to tell me that it should work fine, even without +12V, and that that's normal. Of course that gave him an opening to try - again - to tell me to go home, put the (obviously defective) power supply back in the case and bring the whole thing in so they could get $100 just to put it on a shelf for a few days before calling me and saying "you don't have an operating system." To which I would say "no shit, I just built it and it's never even been powered on. Is the power supply broken? Of course it is, you dumb fucks."
If they had the balls to try and pull that shit on somebody like me, who comes in sporting a geek beard, holding a very fancy power supply and knowing at a glance which of their tools I need to borrow for 15 seconds...I shudder at the thought of what they must have pulled on people like - say - my mother.
I doubt any large chain repair service is any better. I hope the Geek Squad chokes and dies.
Re: (Score:3)
If they had the balls to try and pull that shit on somebody like me, who comes in sporting a geek beard, holding a very fancy power supply and knowing at a glance which of their tools I need to borrow for 15 seconds...I shudder at the thought of what they must have pulled on people like - say - my mother.
I doubt any large chain repair service is any better. I hope the Geek Squad chokes and dies.
Sometimes I wonder if they truly know. I had a "consultation" for home theater install (it was free and I was looking for some advice). I told the GS guy what I was looking for - he proceeded to take a few measures and promise a quote and recommendations. When I got it it was a long list of (expensive) items that would cost as much as a small car, (they seem to simply check every expensive item they sell); when I started asking questions all I got was blank stares. Needless to say, I'm not to impressed wi
Re: (Score:2)
They might have been trying to scam you but you come of as an ass for trying to "borrow" their tools to fix your problem without paying them. I mean would you go into a random automotive mechanic and ask to borrow their testing equipment because you think you know what is broken in your car? Do you like it when people barge into your work and waste your time? I mean I could understand if you bought the PSU from them but otherwise you come off as an ass.
Also any real geek knows those power supply testers are
Re: (Score:3)
"My mechanic" is different from "random mechanic". If you walked in off the street and asked a random mechanic to let you borrow some equipment for a quick test most of them would tell you to piss off, so I don't see why you expect computer technicians to be any different.
The point I was making was that guy had no reason to think you were a customer. Ask anyone in retail these days and they will tell you most of the people in the store aren't customers. They come in to look at products, try them etc, and th
Re: (Score:3)
You know what happens when a technician helps out another technician by a 5 second test using that tool? They generally gain the business of that technician, and the recommendations to their peers and layfolk. Good will is, by itself, good advertising and quite often free. While the person stepping into the store might be able to fix up the computers of everyone, they may not have the time, and when deferring someone to another repair source, who would you recommend? This store that just tried to screw you
Corporate citizenship should be ended. (Score:3, Insightful)
doing it wrong . . . (Score:2)
Another defendant (Score:2)
We prefer Nerd (Score:2)
Geeks bite the heads off of chickens. I'd rather be a member of the Nerd Herd than the Geek Squad.
Of course, if you throw Yvonne Strahovski into the mix, I don't think anyone would pick geek over nerd.
2 cents...
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know where you went to high school or where you work; but I've found this to, largely, be incorrect. Most of the 'geeks' I knew in high school are software developers or system admins or something similar. Even some of the really, really smart geeks I knew, the one who worked at Google and then Plantir (while I'm sure he's rich by normal standards) isn't 'running' things.
I'd bet money there are more CEOs in the US who were former jocks/popular kids than former geeks. I might be wrong, I don't hav
Re: (Score:2)
Cachet, not cache.
Cash is also acceptable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of these big box stores, at least as far as computer sales go, seem to live off the concept of selling the computers, printers and other major components at low margins and then raping the customer over the sale of items like cables, adapters and the like. "Yes, this color laser printer is only $235, and here's your six foot USB cable for $29.95!"
Re: (Score:2)
Most of these big box stores, at least as far as computer sales go, seem to live off the concept of selling the computers, printers and other major components at low margins and then raping the customer over the sale of items like cables, adapters and the like. "Yes, this color laser printer is only $235, and here's your six foot USB cable for $29.95!"
The real money is in service agreements. If you want some laughs, listen to a salesperson push one. If you want more of a discount; negotiate a price and buy the service agreement. If they discount anything it's the item (since the SA covers up to the purchase price for repairs/replacement; not giving you a new item that costs more no matter what the salesperson says); then return the SA for a full refund (most states allow this) and keep the item at the discounted price.
Re: (Score:2)
The "deal" he was able to get me ended up being about $42 (after taxes) more expensive than the best internet price I could find. Obviously, I purchased from the internet and am loving my camcorder. I mean, I can certainly understand paying a small premium for the convenience of walking out of the store with an item, but a nearly 10% premium after the employee discount? That's a bit steep for me.
What is your sales tax rate - that could be most of the difference and since most states have a use tax that you must pay for items bought out of state teh real difference may be smaller. Yes, I know actually paying a use tax is another argument...
WorstBuy don't have geeks... (Score:2)
They have geek squatter. They squat on the geek name, but are not even qualified to plug in power cables.
Re: (Score:2)
saddly i bought something at best buy recently.. i needed some linksys E1000's Newegg has them for 50$+ Tiger/Comp had them for 80$ and oddly bestbuy had them for 45$..
i still feel bad buying something there after the last time was there.