Company Wants You to Visit Near-Space In Their "Bloon" 135
cylonlover writes "While space tourism efforts by the likes of Space Adventures and Virgin Galactic are relying on the tried and true technology of rockets to launch paying customers into space, Barcelona-based company zero2infinity proposes a more leisurely and eco-friendly ride into near-space using a helium balloon called the bloon. Designed to carry passengers to an altitude of 36 km (22 miles), an unmanned scale prototype bloon was flown to an altitude of 33 km (20 miles) last year and the company is already taking bookings for passenger flights that are expected to lift off sometime between 2013 and 2015."
Sounds cool (Score:3, Interesting)
1) But we're running out of helium.
2) You want to go up? Book a MiG-25. We already have private "space tourism" at this level of hopelessly deluded definition of "space tourism". And?
scaring soundtrack (Score:2, Interesting)
it's "lucean le stelle" (eng: the stars were shining), but it talks about a man that ig going to die in desperation (".. e muoio disperato") americans calls them "dead man walking"...
Isn't it funny? Takng off on a experimental vehicle with such a deadful soundtrack?
p.s.
the opera is Puccini's "Tosca" and the character singing is Cavaradossi that is going to be executed...
Re:Kind of unsafe? (Score:4, Interesting)
What about the U-2? (the spyplane, not the awful band)
Re:Sounds cool (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd take the kinesthetic experience of the MIG over the balloony visuals any day.
I'll take whatever gets me the closest to seeing the planet earth from space, soonest, and cheapest. I'll worry about other considerations like how exciting the ride itself later when picking my 2nd and subsequent trips. So let's see how it shakes out...
Mig-29: 22km, available today, $25,000 [bestrussiantour.com] (see the "price list" .pdf link, last page).
Bloon: 36 km, 2013-2015, and $150,000.
The Bloon has a significant altitude advantage, but that's irrelevant compared to the price difference! It may get cheaper at some point in the future, but that just means it fails on the 'soonest' criterion. Sure, I may not exactly have $25k (+ travel) lying around to spend on a Mig-29 flight, but it's clearly the best, most feasible option for me in the near future.
The Mig-29 wins! Then the fact that it's a jet fighter is just awesome-icing on the awesome-cake. :)