Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

Mozart and Bach Handel Subway Station Crime 353

Hugh Pickens writes "The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports that transit officials have started to get a handel on subway crime when they started playing Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, and Strauss at the Lake Street light-rail station after neighborhood residents complained about the station becoming a haven for rowdy teens and vagrants. 'If it encourages some people to wander away because it's not their favorite type of music, I guess that's OK,' says Acting Transit Police Chief A.J. Olson. The program is modeled after one is Portland that has shown early signs of success, though the numbers are so small as to be statistically insignificant and even supporters of the music haven't reached a consensus on whether such environmental changes actually deter crime or just push it down the block. Not everyone is sold on using 'lovely lovely Ludwig Van' as a deterrent. 'Classical music lovers hate the fact that urban planners use classical music to disperse youth,' says Minneapolis City Council Member Gary Schiff. 'Does it chase crime away?' adds Olson. 'It's hard to measure. But I do think it makes it a more pleasant place to wait for a train.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mozart and Bach Handel Subway Station Crime

Comments Filter:
  • by lorinc ( 2470890 ) on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @05:57AM (#39030523) Homepage Journal

    The first and foremost advantage is to have a pleasant wait for your train. I would love to have classical music at my train stations.

    If it can act as a deterrent for inamical people, I take it as a bonus.

  • by RogueyWon ( 735973 ) * on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @06:00AM (#39030549) Journal

    This isn't a particularly new idea. I know that certain shopping centres here in the UK have been using it for quite some time.

    I've got mixed feelings. It's certainly unpleasant to have large groups of feral youths hanging around shopping centres and in principle, something that encourages them to be elsewhere without much fuss is a good thing. On the other hand... it just shifts the problem around. I'd rather have the gang of feral youths stood menacingly inside the brightly lit CCTV-infested shopping centre than in the unlit, unguarded car park outside.

    At least using music for this is better than some of the alternatives. I know that one idea that was briefly used was high pitched noise emitters - the theory being that with young people generally being able to hear higher ranges than adults, only they would be irritated by the noise. I objected to this one very strongly indeed - the noise was outright painful (my hearing is odd - I'm bad at sorting conversation from background noise, but seem to have retained my ability to hear very high ranges) and it was indiscriminate. It was offensive to the "good kid" going shopping for their parents as it was to the feral youth looking for his next mugging victim. I seem to remember that particular trick had to be pulled due to legal reasons.

    I guess I also have some gut concerns about whether this impinges on rights such as freedom of assembly. I guess if it's being used on private property, then it's fine. On subways... that seems a bit more morally dubious.

    And as for the choice of music... I don't think classical music lovers should be particularly offended. Though as somebody who is relatively fond of classical music, I will admit that taken out of place, it can be intrusive. Anybody reading this who commutes through London's Victoria Station will be aware that every few weeks they have some opera singer (and supporting instrumentation) there, collecting money for a cancer research charity. I know it's for a good cause and I shouldn't whinge but... when you're waiting for a delayed train and just want to get home after a long day, the singing, while perfectly "cultured", due to its volume and pitch, can be as intrusive and offensive as blazingly loud gangsta rap would be.

  • What, "What"? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by captainpanic ( 1173915 ) on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @06:04AM (#39030577)

    Since when do the real numbers matter? What really matters is that some politician has shown to "Fight against Crime" (note the capital letters, those are important).

    People demand that action is taken against the nuisances and crime. Whether the action actually works is really not so important, as the results of pretty much every election around the world show.

    A feeling of safety is far more emotional than rational. So, go away with your statistics, and leave us emotional non-rational people alone.

    And obviously, in about a year from now, we demand Action against Crime. Again.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @06:11AM (#39030623)

    Are we sure some age groups have the right to change the environment to their favour? Make places unsuitable for skateboarding, use classical music, install benches instead of swings, do the elderly have the right to make everything suitable for themselves?

    How is this different from the case, when young people put their own art on the walls? The law? What law? The one that is also made by the above 50 to their own needs?

    vajk

  • Re:So... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mwvdlee ( 775178 ) on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @08:20AM (#39031133) Homepage

    There's plenty of classical music with emotional depth less than http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABWyXKT5qt4 [youtube.com], and plenty of rock with highly layered complexity.

    I think a lot of it has to do with identity; teens are typically looking for something to distinguish themselves from their parents yet associate with their peers. A musical style which is not like previous music styles is an ideal medium to do so, especially if their parents hate it. This has been the case for many generations, including what we now call "classical music".

    As a nice side effect, this produces a constant stream of musical (re)-invention with the occasional masterpiece that every person could enjoy.
    The rest will be forgotten just like all mediocre musicians/composers/artists in times of classical music.

  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @08:23AM (#39031153)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:So... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dkleinsc ( 563838 ) on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @08:56AM (#39031329) Homepage

    Your proposition is interesting, but wrong.

    For instance, there's absolutely no influence on Chuck Berry's Johnny B Goode (1958) or Elvis Presley's Heartbreak Hotel (1956) from Terry Riley's In C (1964) or Steve Reich's Come Out (1965). You're right that minimalism influenced a lot of later bands, but there's a clear tradition (as far as anyone can tell, developed mostly by African-Americans) in both rock and rap music stemming from blues that has little if anything to do with the minimalist composers.

    The biggest barrier to classical music influencing kids is not the complexity of the emotional content, it's that there are frequently no words (which prevents a lot of people from thinking they understand it) and that popular culture has put a big effort into making it seem like classical music is only for dorks and old people. This is why I like introducing kids to heavy metal versions of Vivaldi.

  • Re:So... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by couchslug ( 175151 ) on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @09:38AM (#39031603)

    No one young enough to be doing street crime REMEMBERS that movie.

  • Re:So... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 14, 2012 @11:14AM (#39032845)

    Shhh...If they hear you, it'll be re-made in a year or two...

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...