Iâ(TM)m not sure what to think about this. On one hand I think the âoemonolithâ stories have been a funny distraction from an otherwise awful year. I can see why the one in the desert needed to go. But the one in Atascadero should have been left alone. If the people that lived there supported it being there, then it should have been left alone. I donâ(TM)t know enough about the one in Romania. But if it wasnâ(TM)t harming anything I donâ(TM)t see the harm. If it was on private
If it was on private property, then it should be up to the property owner to have it removed and file charges against whoever built it.
And the one in Utah should have been removed by the BLM [blm.gov]. I don't think that private individuals like Christensen have any business unilaterally enforcing land use regulations. Particularly people who are in the business of conducting tours through these areas. Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone.
Not sure (Score:3)
Re:Not sure (Score:2)
If it was on private property, then it should be up to the property owner to have it removed and file charges against whoever built it.
And the one in Utah should have been removed by the BLM [blm.gov]. I don't think that private individuals like Christensen have any business unilaterally enforcing land use regulations. Particularly people who are in the business of conducting tours through these areas. Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone.