Manager Disables Web Server by Sneaking Away Xbox 129
nz17 writes "While the administrator is away the managers will play. A custom Web server went missing at an unnamed public university, but who was the culprit? The department manager. Thinking that the Linux Web server (which used a Microsoft Xbox for its hardware) was a normal game console, he snuck the device out of the server room and home for his son to play over the holiday weekend. The philosophy students who used the server for their class were not amused."
Philosophy students (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Philosophy students (Score:5, Funny)
Umm, hello, they play the xbox. Without the "web server" they can't do that anymore.
Re:Philosophy students (Score:4, Funny)
philosophy students were not amused (Score:2)
But at least this will give them a chance to talk to the media, where they can work in the complaint that no one seems to want to hire philosophy students (the only know job seems to become philosophy teachers).
Re:philosophy students were not amused (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Philosophy students (Score:4, Funny)
We, the students of the university philosophical society demand that you do, or do not, return the Xbox webserver !
Re:Philosophy students (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Well... it is a Microsoft product, so you get the uncertainty and doubt as a given with a side serve of fear...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Philosophy students (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Philosophy students (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Outrage? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
That being said, here's some unsolicited advice for anyone considering majoring in Philosophy: The most important phrase you can learn is "Would you like fries with that." I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying our society doesn't appreciate thinking, and you should be prepared by setting your expectations appropriately.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure it does. And our society rewards each contribution appropriately.
We reward good abstract thinking with a hefty dose of abstract appreciation.
We reward money generating effort with money.
Are you complaining that you choose to value abstract thought and are unhappy that those who choose to value money don't reward your abstract thought with their money?
The article is dated May 28, 2006 (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:The article is dated May 28, 2006 (Score:5, Insightful)
We're looking at YOU, nz17
Re:The article is dated May 28, 2006 (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It was 27th where I live.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It convinced the editors. Of course the date is "clear as day" to anyne who reads it, which the editors apparently hardly ever do. But I'm sure it was noticed by and deliberately chosen by the submitter, using a date so close to today. How could they
Re: (Score:2)
And for the other posters talking about how this is an old story posted on a different site two years later, I did not know that when I submitted it. I merely saw it as highly ranking on Digg's Technology section and thought the S
Re:The article is dated May 28, 2006 (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I had a look at the settings, you can specify how important you think stories from each section are, except idle. (The settings are on http://slashdot.org/help [slashdot.org] -- choose 'Sections'.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
127.0.0.1 idle.slashdot.org
$
Re:The article is dated May 28, 2006 (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The article is dated May 28, 2006 (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't mind Idle but I agree that there should be a way to filter it from the main page like all the other sections. Seems absolutely ridiculous that there isn't.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What better way to let Taco and the rest of the
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Great Story (Score:1, Informative)
Oooold (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Oooold (Score:5, Funny)
Linux on Xbox (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Linux on Xbox (Score:5, Interesting)
Please, Please Stop (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Please, Please Stop (Score:5, Interesting)
I specifically complained about kdawson and the drivel that he posts but CmdrTaco defended him by saying that he (CmdrTaco) though that he (kdawson) did 'a pretty good job' as an editor.
Really, at that point, I realized that there is nothing that anyone can do. I mean, if you can defend kdawson's editing and story submission quality, then I guess you can defend anything.
I don't know how long the average user lasts on Slashdot before getting fed up and moving on; the first 5 years I read Slashdot it steadily improved in quality but the last 5 years have been all downhill. I'm really starting to reach my limit of tolerance for it. Many days I say to myself, "that's it, I'm not reading Slashdot at all anymore", but old habits die hard and I keep coming back.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You are not entitled to anything. If you think it's boring, don't waste your time on it. It is just that simple.
This is really the same as "if you don't like what's on right now, change the channel". Don't spend your time crying like a child in the forums about how you want everything to be a certain way. Just fuck off and read the next article.
Christ you people are sad. Go play on digg where that crybaby shit is the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I used to send corrections to them -- typos, dupes, factual errors, and such. About half the time they did then fix them. But Taco was very bitchy and unappreciative about it. I realised I was just being an unpaid proofreader for lazy jerks who didn't give a shit, so I gave up. Now I just ignore their errors or snark about them in the comments.
The comment moderation is the thing that makes
Re: (Score:2)
Whenever there is a stupid Slashdot story, someone always posts about how stupid it is.
And whenever someone posts about how frustrated they are that Slashdot is posting more and more stupid stories, there is always someone that responds that 'you don't have to read them'.
But is it really that non-obvious that Slashdot would be more enjoyable and worthwhile if the signal to noise ratio was higher? And is it really that hard to believe that s
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, there's no reason why someone should read an Idle story if they don't want to. But on the exact same hand, there's no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to filter them. It's Weeb 2.0 and all that, isn't it?
Re: (Score:2)
Hm, I just had an idea. Someone should implement some kind of browser plugin or something that presents a 'score this article' box alongside all Slashdot stories. Then it could use the combined score that everyone has given the article to decide which ones to filter out as crap. If only I had the web development skills to make that hap
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, it would be a reduced load-- only the people who use the plugin, and only rating traffic. But still, you'd need some powerful server to handle it. Almost as powerful as, say, the Slashdot servers. And since those servers are powerful enough, why not have them run th
Holiday Qualitay (Score:5, Insightful)
At least this line actually made me laugh:
*Sigh* (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Xbox? (Score:1)
Btw: stuff that matters, duh.
Aaaagghhh! Make it stop! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Gods, people, get a grip. If a story doesn't interest you, DON'T FREAKING CLICK ON IT. Duhh. It's not rocket science.
This is the same attitude that people have when they want to ban/censor TV shows and video games they don't like.
If you don't like it, ignore it.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Oh jeeze! Modded by an idle worshiper. Go back to facebook, or wherever the hell you came from. We don't want you in our sandbox.
Slashdot is being AOLed. It's worse than death
Re: (Score:1)
If I had to do that, how would that make Slashdot any different from digg?
this is what they should have used (Score:2)
Reminds me of the old saying... (Score:3, Interesting)
A old desktop likey is faster then the x-box (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
XBox Server... WTF? (Score:2)
I mean, it might be a funny thing, a cool home-made project or a public internet demostration but serously.. running an university server on an XBox? WTH were they thinking? [ironic]I guess the university doesn't get enough founds to buy a proper server so teachers have to take its personal entertainment servers to work or otherwise they can have a server for their classes.[/ironic]
Guess what? The manager should be awarded for discovering a critical secur
I can see him running around and telling everyone: (Score:1)
"What is it then?"
"ME!!!!"
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
My question is.... (Score:2)
Seriously, what's a game console doing in the server room? There are no other alternatives? No leftover hardware (PIII-almost-anything, P4-anythinbg at-all, Athlon-ditto) more than capable of doing the job?
The article was replete with references to the lack of respect management had for the proletariat IT staff, blahblahblahblahblah. Feh.
Labeling equipment in the server room is crucial. How about a decent label if, for no other reas
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
What bugs me the most is that someone who is an IT department manager saw something in the server room that was plugged in, on the networ
Re: (Score:2)
That's why this story just doesn't ring true. The article says "The manager had thought the X-Box was just a games console that the IT departments staff used for recreation when it got quiet. Noticing that the X-Box hadn't been moved from the server room for some time and that hi
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
It's shit like this that makes me glad I don't work in IT.
Re: (Score:1)
Because it's cheap, and readily available [ebay.com], and widely popular [google.com]. If you don't care what the box itself looks like, a computer is a computer is a computer and if the admin of that particular boxen decided to use cheap, readily available, and widely supported hardware to run their server on, that's their dec
Re: (Score:2)
This is not my first gig in a strict environment. Classified military systems are more restrictive, with one site I was on ha
Kudos to the admin (Score:5, Funny)
WTF - An X-BOX?! (Score:1, Insightful)
The admin got what he deserved. The IT Manager was right to pull that piece of crap out of the rack.
It would have been worse if it were an XBox 360. We all know how friggin' reliable they have been.
The admin is no hero here. He was a stupid fool from the start.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Not Amused? (Score:2)
Fucking Digg submissions (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:Fucking Digg submissions (Score:4, Insightful)
Now, a 2 year old Idle story being forced onto everyone's front page, that's a better thing to moan about...
Re: (Score:2)
Now I'm damn sure..... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
fairy tales (Score:2)
Many fairy tales emphasize the importance of not messing with things you don't understand and not taking other people's possessions.
(Here's another hint from the fairy tales: if the Xbox doesn't turn into a beautiful princess after the first kiss, stop kissing it. I don't know what it means, but it seemed relevant.)
Re: (Score:2)
Peter: So you understand all these gifts were supposed to be for my family. It was just some crazy mix-up.
Hick Mother: Kill 'em.
Hick Father: [Pumps shotgun]
Peter: No, no, no. It's true. You see, that remote control cow was for my son. And those barrettes were for my daughter. And, uh.... Hey, where's my VCR?
Hick C
Hard to believe (Score:2)
If this is true, it sounds more like a bunch of kids playing at IT. It's not just the use of the Xbox; but they also apparently didn't tell anyone which box
Story is fake, as well as old (Score:2)
Sets font (Score:2)
coolest slashdot story ever (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
2) Submit said story to slashdot
3) ???
4) Profit!!!
Re:OLD (Score:5, Funny)
Let's post some Scientology documents!