Massive EU Program To Study Three-legged Dogs 85
DMandPenfold writes "A multi-billion dollar European Union IT research fund will help study the behavior of three-legged dogs, it has been revealed. The fund will support extensive studies into how three-legged dogs move. There is a particular focus on how the dogs balance and function, given their missing limb."
I well wo... (Score:1)
HUH?
Really? Billions of dollars in three legged dogs ey?
What in the world are they thinking about? I know I know, three legged dawgs.
Re: (Score:2)
Billions of dollars in three legged dogs
While this sounds excessive, it's only truly crazy to consider that after they convert euros to dollars to start the program they just have to convert them back to spend on the local expenses. Think how many more three legged dogs could benefit if only the researchers hadn't pissed away a good 20% in paying the exchange fees twice.
Re:I well wo... (Score:5, Informative)
No, not billion dollars for 3-legged dogs. They are funded by a fund that hands out a billion dollars in research funds to thousands of projects. So dogs will only get a tiny fraction of it.
Re: (Score:1)
The dogs will get none of it. If they're lucky, they'll get a couple of meals every day, in exchange for running with sensors attached all over their body, under bright lights, for 18 hours a day...
Re: (Score:2)
HUH?
Really? Billions of dollars in three legged dogs ey?
What in the world are they thinking about? I know I know, three legged dawgs.
Well the EU wants to understand Muslims, so why not start by a a study of Muhammad. Since he is long since dead any other dog that isn't walking on all paws will do.
You could be on to something there .... standing in a roundabout [wikipedia.org] is asking to lose a leg.
They hop? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> the few two legged dogs that manage to get around.
You don't need to focus on the rather few two legged dogs.
There are four legged dogs then get around fine on two legs too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MUhb00kiXs [youtube.com]
Many other examples... So the sample size can be bigger.
Did they hear about the three legged dog... (Score:5, Funny)
Did they hear about the three legged dog that walked into a saloon?
The barkeep asked him what he wanted.
He said: "I'm lookin' for the man that shot my paw!"
Re: (Score:2)
> Did they hear about the three legged dog that walked into a saloon?
Walking into saloons[1] are a common way for dogs to become three legged.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saloon_(automobile) [wikipedia.org]
It's for locomotion research (Score:5, Informative)
Towards the bottom of the article, it mentions that the purpose of the study is "... to develop advanced robots that can help animals and even humans cope with function after the loss of a limb."
The headline and summary make it sound like utterly frivolous bullshit, when it's actually important research into motion and balance techniques in living creatures that can be applied to robotics.
Typical Slashdot.
Re:It's for locomotion research (Score:4, Interesting)
So there's already lots going on cognitively here, just with ordinary gaits. Now imagine that misfortune has struck and there is one less limb. What happens, not just kinematically but cognitively? Is the pattern for a preexisting gait reconfigured, or is there some degree of latent capability that wakes up?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Behind the times much? http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/07/17/1152222 [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Towards the bottom of the article...
I think you mean typical media, not just typical slashdot. This is what the study is about, it should be inside the first paragraph, the methods the study uses (3-legged dogs) are much less important to the overall understanding of the subject and should be farther down. But then, that wouldn't make a sensationalist headline, so why would they want to do that.
Re: (Score:2)
As for making robotic prosthesises, perhaps at some poi
Re:It's for locomotion research (Score:5, Funny)
Giving it a robotic leg is just plane silly.
Which, for those of you not in the know, is less than car silly, but more than boat silly. Still, I think that method of comparing silly levels is plain silly.
Re: (Score:1)
Giving it a robotic leg is just plane silly.
Which, for those of you not in the know, is less than car silly, but more than boat silly. Still, I think that method of comparing silly levels is plain silly.
No, you misunderstand. Plane silly is less than space silly, but more than line silly.
In fact, there is only one thing less then line silly, and beyond that there is no point.
Re: (Score:1)
Maybe they're just suffering from phantom limb syndrome and all they need is a mirror box.
If you were to lose a limb, would you be so unhappy that it would just be time for "sleep"?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Ours runs rip-shit-riot around the house and lives a wonderful life. He plays with other
Re: (Score:1)
Normally I'm all for studies that don't have any obvious near term benefit, but this is ridiculous. It's not a particularly useful set of studies to be making ...
Well, one of the differences between the philosophical mind and the scientific mind is that the former loves to reason out conclusions a priori like you're doing above, whereas the latter likes to actually test things. It's impossible to say until after the study is done whether it will yield any useful results. There are good reasons to think it will, though, as the same neural processes are pretty much guaranteed in all mammals when it comes to how they going about reorganizing their locomotive systems.
Re: (Score:2)
The headline and summary make it sound like utterly frivolous bullshit, when it's actually important research into motion and balance techniques in living creatures that can be applied to robotics.
And to add insult to injury, it's on Idle. I think /. needs roles for their editors, i.e. Science Editor, Civil Rights Editor, Gaming Editor, Book Review Editor, etc.
Nice to know... (Score:1, Redundant)
No irony, not wasted (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Thats what they call me (Score:1, Funny)
The ladies call me the Three Legged Dog, and I'd love to show you how I move.
Re: (Score:2)
If you ask me to throw you a bone, I'm leaving.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Gigity.
Re: (Score:2)
Sweet jeebus! I wish I had mod points!
Re: (Score:1)
We're all guys here you insensitive clod.
Automail anyone? (Score:1, Insightful)
1 step closer to automail... :)
Re: (Score:2)
Old Joke -- EU and the three-legged pig (Score:1)
How about as fodder for jokes?...
This traveling salesman is _way_ out in the hills and approaches a farmer to try to sell his wares. He notices a three legged pig hopping around in the front yard and asks the farmer about it. "That's no ordinary pig!" exclaims the farmer. "That pig is smart! We all owe our lives to that thar pig! Why, last winter we wuz all asleep and a spark
actual information (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the actual project site: http://locomorph.eu/ [locomorph.eu]
Obviously not all of the 1.3 billion USD (not actually "multi-billion" -- the Euro/Dollar conversion isn't that bad!) is going to research on "three-legged dogs". It's about robotic locomotion in general, of which that may be one component (although the project web site doesn't particularly mention it).
Also, it's a four-year project split between six universities. That's about $50 million per year for each site, which is still a big grant but doesn't seem so crazy for the field.
Oh, it's even worse than that. (Score:2)
Looks like the €1B goes to 16,000 separate participants -- the Locomorph project is just one of those. Soooo, an average of about $80,000 each. :-/
Idle or not, very stupid and suggestive article (Score:2, Insightful)
Most of the article focuses on 1 billion vs 3-legged dogs. Only the last paragraph mentions that a total of 16000 researchers will be funded. I'm quite sure some of the remaining 15995 are doing something useful or interesting too, but somehow they neglect to mention this.
A typical example of modern media hyping things up, a submitter that makes it even worse, and a Slashdot editor who thinks what the heck it's summer lets put it on the front page.
And a slashdot reader who reads it (Score:2)
If people stopped reading slashdot because they didn't like the articles, then slashdot editors would change their act.
But we don't. We watch Idols and so they serve us Idols. The news has become froth at the mouth headlines because that is what people watch.
Follow the money, the money always comes from the viewer. YOU (and me)
Re: (Score:2)
> Follow the money, the money always comes from the viewer. YOU (and me)
YOU, maybe. Not me. I block all ads.
U.S. falls behind in 3 leg dog research (Score:2, Funny)
It used to be that The U.S. let the world in everything: steel production , electricity production, coal, silly government boondoggle projects, etc. Now we wake up one day and find that the Europeans are pulling ahead of us. leaving us in the dust in 3 leg dog research.
Another sad note on the decline of our once great country.
Different body shapes (Score:2)
They've got the hearts of champions (Score:2)
obligatory Homestarrunner reference: http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail109.html [homestarrunner.com]
"I can make it on my own."
Life Aquatic (Score:2)
I was just watching Life Aquatic last night and there was a three legged dog running around, its movement was pretty incredible especially when it was running.
I doubt it's billions. (Score:2)
Millions, maybe. Billions to study animal locomotion ? NFW
Robotics links (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Shh.... we don't want to upset them.
Re: (Score:2)
"There's a hard core [of the "environmental movement"] that's sort of a zombie remnant of Soviet psyops. - ESR"
I'm on a mailing list with that drama queen!
He really believes that bullshit, you know.
Offtopic (Score:2)
Oh I'm sure he does. Luckily he's got his trusty .45 to protect you from the commie zombie eco-nuts.
He's also the guy to see if you have some FORTRAN problems.
Re: (Score:2)
Irony is defined thus:
I'm the guy who recommended the particular .45 pistol (the Colt Officer's Model [guncollectorsclub.com]) he ultimately purchased.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, as long as you didn't teach him all he knows about FORTRAN...
Re: (Score:2)
That would be 10 minutes of my life I'd never get back.
Do they wear the ground more or less? (Score:2)
I owned one (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I used to see a dog that apparently had non-functional rear legs.
It's hard to describe the device he was riding on, but it was like half a toy scooter with a harness. He seemed to be able to pull himself along with just his front legs, at least on a flattish surface.
I reckon injuries on the same side or opposite corners would be a bit of a bugger, though.
Re: (Score:1)
wow (Score:1)
Interesting study, love too see data (Score:1)
Interesting study ;
I wonder if there is interest in studying the adaptive phase of the subjects transfering between 4 to 3 legs. What effect does age of the subjects have? I hope they study the transition of gates on tread mill.
I would love access to this data and a peak at the models. Using Neural-nets? Evolutionary nets?
I imagine a 3 legged robot would be the most cost effective proposition system.
Cool stuff!
Make that 2.7 million Euro (Score:5, Informative)
The implication that the EU is spending billions of euros on a program to study 3-legged dogs is completely misleading. The fund in question appears to be FP7 (Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org]), which funds a huge variety of researchers on many differnet topics.
If you look at what I think is the relevant EU site [europa.eu], the project received EUR 2.7 million from the 'Embodied intelligence' Initiative within the 'Information and communication technologies' (ICT) Thematic area of the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7).
Which wouldn't make much of a story I guess - "multi-billion" sounds waaay more impressive.
-Chris
Mod parent up (Score:4, Insightful)
Indeed, the real story here (though not news by any means) is the inability of the British press to report on the EU without being willfully misleading. The headline "European £1bn IT programme to study three-legged dogs" is not strictly speaking false - it just fails to mention that that 1 billion will be used for many other things as well. A more reasonable article is here: European IT Research Gets €1.2 Billion From EU [pcworld.com].
mod parent up (Score:1)
here (Score:2)
http://locomorph.eu/home/project/description [locomorph.eu]
More evidence... (Score:2)
...of how far Europe is ahead of the USA in science.
OMG ! (Score:1, Funny)
OMG ! Those billions of dollars could have been invested in the military in order to bring democracy in so many countries !
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS !
Stupid europeons ! They'd all be speaking german if it wasn't for us ! Just give us the money ! We are good with money !
No shortage of test subjects (Score:2)
Will it solve the biggest question? (Score:1)
"given their missing limb" (Score:1)