Today's Children Are Officially Potty Mouths 449
tetrahedrassface writes "When the Sociolinguistics Symposium met earlier this month swearing scholar Timothy Jay revealed that an increase in child swearing is directly related to an increase in adult swearing. It seems that vulgarity is increasing as pop culture continues to popularize vulgarities. The blame lies with media, public figures, politicians, but mostly ourselves. From the article: 'Children as young as two are now dropping f-bombs, with researchers reporting that more kids are using profanity — and at earlier ages — than has been recorded in at least three decades.'"
Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
So fucking what? /sarcasm
Re: (Score:2)
Why the sarcasm?
I find "So fucking what?" to be a perfectly reasonable answer.
What is the problem with kids anyone swearing? Is that person hurting anyone else in any way?
The closest to an explanation I've heard is "I don't want my kids to hear that language". Which is as stupid an argument as can be. Your kids, your fucking problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, for certain words to be considered taboo is pretty silly.
Though I do think it's extremely sad when I hear parents shouting and swearing at their 2 year old kids when they are crying (makes you wonder why they're crying when their parents are treating them so nicely!). Seems like they don't have much chance of being happy in life and are just going to do the same to their own kids.
The best/worst one around here (my workplace is right next to a rather "deprived" area), was a parent shouting "DON'T YOU FU
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think certain words carry a certain weight, and overusing them dilutes them. Fuck is a perfect example of a word that has no weight anymore (IMO) - my mom would (and did) literally wash my mouth out with soap for saying that word (shit or crap was about the best I could get away with growing up). Bloody in England had a similar path - it once was taboo to say it, now people use it constantly.
Remember that some words are derogatory, though - nigger, bitch, cow (to a fat woman), etc - even if you don't co
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yep nigger is actually one of the strangest words today I think. It actually is a pretty cool word, ie works well in rap songs, etc, but if a white person says it, they're in trouble. The world is a very strange place.
Re: (Score:2)
oh noes! people are speaking freely! what a catastrophe!
sheesh.
It's only in the US that people care about this. Irony of freedom of speech, huh.
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh Belgium, not this again.
They're words. As many bright people (including Frank Zappa and George Carlin) have pointed out, getting worked up over the words is silly. Getting worked up over the meanings, hatreds, etc behind the words is appropriate, but the words themselves are harmless.
A big myth related to children in general is that they're innocent creatures ignorant of all things biological. They aren't, and they never really have been.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Just the opposite. 5 digits would indicate he's been here a long time and probably in his 30s (minimum)
DEFINE VULGARITY
Why is it vulgar to say "shit" but not "poo"? Or "fuck" but not "intercourse" or "sex"? Or "ass" but not "buttocks"? Or "I'm eating cow, pig, or deer" but not "I'm eating beef, pork, or venison"?
The answer, per usual, is the fault of the French. They were the ones who declared ~900 years ago that English words are vulgar and should be avoided, in favor of French substitutes.
Time to te
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Informative)
Vulgarity comes from the Latin, meaning basically unrefined or plebeian. Vulgar Latin is what morphed into Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Romanian. Often times the word seems to get confused with profane, which basically just means not sacred, and they both get confused with obscene.
So, yes, traditional Anglo-Saxon words for certain things are considered vulgar, because of the Norman conquest. Its why we have the Saxon words for living animals, as they took care of the livestock, and the Norman words for the food version of same (sheep v. mutton, duck v. canard, etc).
as to my uid, yes it's mine, yes i'm the original holder of it, but no I'm only 26. Been here a right while though.
Re: (Score:2)
I think poo going the wrong way up an anus would make a different sound.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Funny)
What does low 4 digit mean?
That you are actually dead and your post was made by a highly evolved AI that you wrote many years ago.
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
What does low 4 digit mean?
That you are actually dead and your post was made by a highly evolved AI that you wrote many years ago.
Not necessarily highly evolved. Some of us were replaced by small shell scripts.
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Informative)
Swearing may not be, but being able to contextually adjust your behavior is. I'd bet that everyone in your honors program was able to differentiate between situations where it's inappropriate to swear and situations where it's permissible or even expected to do so. That kind of awareness and ability to read situations is definitely something that more intelligent people do better.
There probably is a correlation between inappropriate swearing and low education/IQ.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
... That said if you play any MMO game that is simple enough for kids to play, you will likely read or hear the worst language you have ever had the misfortune to be exposed to.
I've never seen any language in an MMO I wouldn't want my children exposed to. OTOH, I've seen racism, anti-semitism, homophobia, and worst of all, incredible levels of misogyny that I would want to see anyone exposed to.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm pretty sure I have plenty of fun. Originally, I didn't cuss because of the sin and parental threat of punishment. After a while, I took it as a badge of honor. But now, I see it as mostly an aspect of self-control.
I know myself quite well and know that I have an addictive personality. In some areas of my life, I have to reign myself in or it can get out of control (I'm addicted to the Internet....but I'm not going to "fix" that). With my addictive personality, I know that were I to begin consuming
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually, everyone uses "curse words", just some people use more politically acceptable ones. So I don't think that's the entire answer.
I never used to "swear", though I certainly always had words I'd use if I hurt myself or was describing a negative situation etc. Since I'm no longer religious I've started drifting to using more conventional swear words - mostly when nobody else is around, in fact, so it's not to try and shock anyone. I still wouldn't swear in front of my family because they would find it heavily offensive. The most taboo of current swear words do seem to just roll off the tongue in a nice stress relieving way. Maybe it's purely a psychological thing like you say, but I think many current swear words have gotten to be where they are today just because they are fun to say, whether socially acceptable or not.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think that's entirely true. As should be quite obvious, pretty much all swear words have lost much of their ability to shock as their use has become more widespread...and yet I still find an appropriately placed "damn it!" or even 'fuck!' to be quite cathartic. There are more shocking, disgusting words ('santorum' comes to mind), but I don't curse simply to gross people out, I curse, when I do, because the curse words I'm using have definitions which are in line with my current sentiment.
well fuck (Score:2)
what is this shit? i don't even....
But (Score:4, Insightful)
If curse words become a part of normally accepted speech, what the hell will we use for curse words then???
Re:But (Score:5, Funny)
iPod, iPhone, iPad etc
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:But (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Mod this goddamn asshole up, too, you fucks.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do we need curse words?
Surely there are languages in the world that don't have such a ridiculous idea as "forbidden words". How do they get on?
Re: (Score:2)
Surely there are languages in the world that don't have such a ridiculous idea as "forbidden words".
I highly doubt that, unless you're talking about an unknown cetacean or cephalopod language. Humans are good at putting up meaningless restrictions because we know our young like to push barriers. We would rather have them say "naughty" things and feel like they've pushed a real boundary than have them do something that society abhors (crime) because it is the only barrier to push.
Actually... (Score:5, Informative)
I have heard that Japanese doesn't have any words that could be considered to be profane per se. At least, that's what quite a few manga scanlation translators have asserted on their posts, when they have deign to explain :D
Instead, the Japanese seem to utilize impoliteness and rudeness. So instead of a special word like "Freddy Uncle Charlie Kent", they have a rude form of the word "YOU!", which will serve the same purpose
Re:Actually... (Score:5, Informative)
Many languages are actually like that.
Sotho is an example. While some words are considered "swearing" in parts with heavy English influence (i.e. in South Africa, all the words corresponding to English profanity), this was not traditionally the case and is still not the case in other parts (i.e. Lesotho). I'm still trying to learn the language, so I can't give much detail.
The Japanese language, since you mentioned it, has to take into account the complex social hierarchy (which is based on Confucian ideas). Once again my Japanese is not too good, so everyone feel free to add to/correct this.
A word such as "temee" (probably the "you" that you referred to) is considered rude not because the word itself is inherently evil, but because it does not properly reflect the relation between the status of the speaker and the addressed.
If I'm your senior (in age, in the workplace, or in basically any other way) your calling me "temee", "omae", "kimi", "anata" or any one of a number of words used for English "you" would be a very bad idea. Each of these does, however, have situations to which they apply.
Let's say that you and I are men, that we are very good friends, and that there is no relationship of seniority. "Omae" would fit perfectly.
Let's say that I'm some random guy of no real importance. "Anata" would do.
Things get even more complicated when you begin to include sarcasm. "Kisama" is a very formal form of "you". In fact, it's so formal that it is only ever used sarcastically. But you can not be sarcastic with any other word. Never. ;)
You can see where this is going.
As for the things normally used for swearing (religion, bodily functions, etc.), there is much truth to what you said. Example: "Kuso" may translate to "faeces" in some more formal contexts. It can also be used as an expletive ("Shit!").
Japanese does have words for sex, but they're not really used all that much. (Despite the fact that the Japanese don't share the Victorian mindset of "sex is dirty and no-one is doing it".) Merely having euphemisms doesn't make a word streng verboten.
Sorry for the core dump.
Re: (Score:2)
http://news.discovery.com/human/f-bomb-swear-curse-words-biden.html [discovery.com]
Also apparently Japanese does not have many/any swear words? It does have offensive words/phrases like any other language of course.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Curse words really have no purpose.
There are two common uses of curse words:
(1) An expression of spontaneous bad emotion.
(2) As way of hurting someone else without really thinking.
The first purpose already has an international language. If someone in any culture hits their hand with a hammer, they all use the same sounds whether or not they ultimately say a curse word. Curse words add no value.
The second usage is just plain laziness. If you really want to put someone down, you should put some thought into i
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Turns out that swearing is a natural analgesic: Scientific American article on the subject [scientificamerican.com]
Thoughtless use is not the only use. Nobody could 'cleverly' refer to the case of Ar
Duh (Score:2)
Not really a big deal (Score:3, Insightful)
When those children are adults, it will no longer be considered profane. Problem solved.
Re:Not really a big deal (Score:5, Insightful)
just like when kids i the 60's would make marijuana legal when they got into politics.
Please.
disgraceful (Score:5, Funny)
as my toddler would say, that's fucked up!
Adults too. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing also that parents aren't beating their children (spanking) or rinsing their mouth out (with liquid dish soap) as much either.
Oh yes, the fantastic lesson of "If someone does something you don't want him to, harm him".
It works wonders.
Re:Adults too. (Score:5, Insightful)
One thing I've noticed is that adults are less likely to call other adults out on profanity around children. I remember as a kid going to baseball games it was pretty unusual for someone to swear and not be called out on it. The swearing happened, as a kid I was aware of it, but I also saw the adults around me taking the time to ask the person to mind their language.
Maybe I'm just old and cranky, but that kind of thing doesn't happen as much anymore. Adults are either a lot more tolerant or much more timid in engaging the lewd individual and asking them to stop. I miss that.
Re:Adults too. (Score:5, Insightful)
I think the distinction between "private" and "public" language has decreased. It used to be that vulgar words weren't used in common discourse with strangers, or in public forums, or in mixed company. These words were reserved for use with your buddies, a "men's language" if you will, and were used only rarely, or for strong effect, by women.
A lot of these distinctions have decreased with the spread of mass-market media that depicts these words used commonly. I think this was initially a way to make movies and television shows feel more authentic and real, closer to the common language of people, with the result being that the spoken language of the US as a whole has become more common.
I think as the words have become more common and less laden with shock value, adults concern about their children hearing or using them has diminished. So I suspect adults are just less shocked to hear others use these words in public and realize the futility of trying to prevent their children from hearing them when they are likely to hear them in movies or on television anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Great! Maybe we'll all be forced to learn how to communicate instead of being shocked senseless by a word someone says.
Slow news day (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure it was written by Plato, but he was quoting his teacher Socrates. (Who was in turn sentenced to death for corrupting the morals of the young -- go figure!)
Isn't kind of obvious? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone can see the world going to hell around them, so it would simply be misleading for kids to say "we will be burdened by the out of control debts of our predecessors" when everyone knows it's more accurate and succinct to simply say "we're fucked."
Anecdote (Score:5, Interesting)
My nephew just turned 4 a little while back. Sadly, he has a speech impediment that has made him difficult, if not impossible, to understand until very recently. Over over the past 6 months or so his speech has improved considerable and we finally know... that the kid swears like a sailor, he's probably been swearing for years and no one ever knew it. Seriously, we're all in the kitchen and we hear "Holy shit!" come out of the living room, go in to see what's going on and he's watching Sesame Street. Obviously we tried and failed to not laugh, so I can't imagine we helped the situation any.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Well, that's the values that Sesame Street is pushing onto the kids these days. Be happy you didn't walk onto him while he was having a joint with a couple of bitches.
I wonder how his 'holly shit' sounded before that time: hoooueee siiiid
Re: (Score:2)
Don't blame the media.. (Score:5, Insightful)
... blame the parents. The media just reflects what is acceptable to society.
I've always wondered though why Americans get so upset about bad language and sex, but violence on TV is ok for children to watch.
Re: (Score:2)
The media just reflects what is acceptable to society
No it doesn't. The media reflects what sells. Any correlation with social values is purely coincidental.
One thing you have to keep in mind, when reading the OP, is that this is the perspective of someone who watches a lot of TV, and hangs out with other people who watch a lot of TV.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The media just reflects what is acceptable to society
No it doesn't. The media reflects what sells. Any correlation with social values is purely coincidental.
One thing you have to keep in mind, when reading the OP, is that this is the perspective of someone who watches a lot of TV, and hangs out with other people who watch a lot of TV.
No, the censors are the ones who determine what appears before the audience and what does not. The MPAA is an unaccountable body that considers views of the sex act, or even references to it, to be less acceptable than views of someone getting his head blown off. What the market actually wants has very little to do with it.
Re: (Score:2)
What planet are you from? The media reports edge cases over and over again until it becomes so often it becomes 'normally'.
Stop using the sex/violence false dichotomy. There separate things and the deserve different conversations.
Re: (Score:2)
This is rather insightful. I wonder the same thing. Profanity and sexuality are considered inappropriate for children to observe, yet we consider violence to be acceptable? None of them are acceptable!
I was in HS when South Park first began. There was this one occasion where I was fixing the computer of a family, and their 8 and 9 year old children were watching the show. Sure, I enjoyed the show, and watched it on a regular basis. At that time, I was a very different person than I am now. Spewing ou
Re:Don't blame the media.. (Score:5, Insightful)
my sister is quite possibly the most selfish and arrogant person to walk this planet
This is the kind of unnecessarily wordy language that confuses young kids. It's much easier and more accurate to say "my sister is a bitch" which everyone understands more clearly.
Today's children aren't potty mouths, they're just much more efficient in their usage of words. Why sugar coat something when the efficient bad words are commonly accepted?
Re:Don't blame the media.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Eloquence. This is a weapon of the vocabulary knights. Not as random or as clumsy as your profanity, an elegant weapon for a more civilized age.
Re: (Score:2)
Whoops, that's a different idiotic American attitude than the one we're talking about....
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The world is a dynamic place full of unfathomable joy, and unrelenting shittiness. We should have a full vocabulary and worldview to express and conceptualize this.
Re: (Score:2)
You know I always wondered why many parents were happy to watch TV/Films about murder rape torture etc. Things we really hate and would never allow our children to do.
Yet forbid them from watching shows about/including sex. The one activity we all take great pride in doing (Slashdot meme's notwithstanding).
The only explanation I have for this is while all parents seem to want to become grandparents some day, they don't want to become grandparents too soon.
Or it could be linked to the negative connotation of
Clarence Darrow (Score:2)
I don't swear for the hell of it. Language is a poor enough means of communication. We've got to use all the words we've got. Besides, there are damn few words anybody understands -- Spencer Tracy (Inherit the Wind).
That said, we never curse in our house. Neither have our children (age 10 and 8) other than to ask about a word they've heard.
f-"bomb"? c-"bomb" (Score:2)
One of these things is not like the others, one of these things just doesn't belong.
Re: (Score:2)
Objectively I'm inclined to agree that 'bomb' registers higher on a natural 'offensive-scale'. But I firmly believe no word can truly be 'offensive', it's only the intent...
I personally only take offense at people taking offense...
Swearing is relative (Score:5, Insightful)
Swearing is relative to a perceived base.
On the old people stodgy baseline it is all swearing, even "boobies".
On the young people base line "fuck" is emphasis mark.
Language changes. Swear words are something that change quite quickly.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly.
While the vernacular changes, the words also take on additional meaning. 20-30 years ago, "shit" was more of an exclamation than anything else. Now, it's a stand-in for nearly any noun in the language. Terms like "I don't give a shit," "I have to get my shit together," and "...and shit" weren't really as common then. Now that the term has become common, it's passed from vulgarity into common acceptance.
The "new" cuss words showing up can also be related to the important issues in today's society
Re: (Score:2)
Swear words are something that change quite quickly.
There is some truth to that, in the sense that perception of vulgarity in certain words can seem to increase or decrease relatively rapidly with time, but on the other hand, most of the actual curse words we use are incredibly old from a linguistic perspective.
Fuck has cognates all over the Germanic languages, and seems very close to the word futuere in Latin, so at the very least it dates to proto-Germanic with borrowing throughout Europe (hey, it's a goo
Maybe it's not the kids? (Score:2)
Maybe it's their damn parents imparting an unrealistic sense of self importance in them.
Kids today think they can do what ever they dang well please since by and large their folks allow them to. I think this translates directly into these little monsters lack of proper social etiquette and respect for anyone around them.
It would be interesting to further break this down into geographic subsets. Since I have lived in Germany, I have noticed that most folks put the hammer down on their little ones.
I have neve
Re: (Score:2)
Stop using what you see in the media as the example of how kids behave. The are polite and speak properly.
Yeah, because only kids who are little followers and cow toe do you and give you imagned respect as raised by good parents.
You don't wont kids, you want sheep.
Is this really a problem? (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't know how others feel, but I've never felt some sort of stigma against using swear words. The only time I refrain is when it's socially unacceptable (i.e. at a funeral) because then other people would potentially become upset towards me. At my funeral though? I'm going to encourage it. From the grave.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed, I assign very little malice to a swear word. It's just a word, that a lot of people have decided is unacceptable, for some reason I fail to understand.
For example: We can say sex as many times as we want on TV. But not fuck. Why not? What made the one vulgar but the other not? It seems horribly arbitrary to me...
And why are people sad that the young generation no longer assign shock-and-horror to that word? Isn't that a good thing? We're LOSING a swear word!
The only effect this will have is, that th
...like a sailor (Score:2, Funny)
It's time to change the expression from curse like a sailor to curse like a 2-year old.
Who the fuck cares? (Score:5, Insightful)
I have never understood the stigma about swearing. They are words, just like any other. What really is the difference between saying "I took a dump" and "I took a shit"? They mean exactly the same thing, but for some reason shit is a dirty word.
It is all about how you use words, not the words you use. You can be just as vulgar and mean without using "swear" words. Is it really less offensive for me to say "The best part of you squirted out of your father's substandard size penis and rolled down that chunk of lard your mother called a thigh" than for me to say "Holy fuck that is cool"?
Words are just words, it's the meaning behind them that matters.
It's nothing but censorship (Score:2)
Re:Who the fuck cares? (Score:4, Interesting)
It IS the meaning behind the words that matters and that's what's been diluted in "the words" by overuse. So much that we don't even separate swears curses and vulgarities by category anymore.
At one time, "damn you" LITERALLY meant "I sincerely hope that God Almighty recognizes your irredeemable unworthiness and condemns you to burn in Hell for all eternity" where it was understood that both parties believed there was such a place and that a soul could be sent there to scream in agony literally forever. That would be a curse. No two year old even has enough understanding of things to muster the level of contempt for another required to utter that in sincerity.
The vulgarities were a lesser form of contempt. By using one, you were implying that the person you were speaking to was unworthy of any better. However, overuse might lead others to conclude that you yourself HAD no better and were a low person yourself. That's why parents were so adamant about their children not using vulgarities.
Obscenities were more of the nature of the vulgarities.
The fact that we're far more likely to hear "damn you" on television than "fuck you" is strong evidence that we've forgotten how to properly curse at all.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I recall Joe Bob Briggs telling that anecdote while hosting Planet of the Apes on TNT's Monster Vision. Which, immediately after the commercial break, TNT, in their fine understanding of irony, ran the censored v
Need more powerful words (Score:4, Funny)
"Jesus Fuck!"
"Christ's Tits!"
"Mother of God's Firm Ass!"
"Jesus Raped!"
I could go on..
Children *how* young? (Score:2)
You say children as young as two years are saying "fuck"?
Did anybody else think of this [youtube.com]?
Smeg! (Score:2)
We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultures (Score:5, Insightful)
This isn't much of a surprise to me anymore. In previous generations we idolized decent, intelligent, articulate and educated people. Somewhere it was decided that nobody can or should have to aspire to be any of those things and we should just aim for mediocrity because EVERYONE can be mediocre!
At least in the US I am seeing this perpetual dumbing-down of the culture (some will argue here that the US culture was pretty dumb to begin with hehehe). Instead of "dressing for success" kids now wear these pants that sag down to their knees. This is a holdover from the prison culture where clothes are baggy and ill-fitting. Reality TV idolizes people who are often foul, vulgar, have no education and oh yeah, don't have any kind of gainful employment. What do we learn from shows like The Hills or Jersey Shore? Instead of keeping rigid and tough education requirements, public schools in the US have been dumbed-down so that "everyone gets a chance." Well I have some news - in the real world, nobody gets a chance, you have to work your ass off to get anywhere.
The more it is used (Score:2)
Immature. (Score:2)
I swear occasionally and sometimes more than I should. But I do make effort to keep it in check; for example, I never swear at work and I avoid swearing in front of my daughter. I don't have a problem with swearing, but I absolutely think it's a sign of class or lack thereof. Whenever I come across someone who's every second word is a swear they just come off as stupid like they don't care about having a good presentation. And too many people seem to have this immature notion that swearing makes you an adul
A side effect of being a potty mouth. (Score:4, Insightful)
What do people who use foul language constantly say when they are really angry. You can't use foul language because there is no difference from the way you normally talk. I'm saying that swearing is OK but keep it to a minimum. I quickly take notice when people that rarely swear actually do swear, I know immediately that they are really ticked off.
I once say a movie that used the F-bomb so often that it ruined the movie. The percentage of vulgarity was over half of the dialog. It was so bad that you couldn't tell if the actors were supposed to be angry.
fuck fuck fuck fuck penis fuckity-fuck-fuck (Score:2, Interesting)
Swearing in films (Score:5, Insightful)
Annie Wilkes: It's the swearing, Paul. It has no nobility.
Paul Sheldon: These are slum kids, I was a slum kid. Everybody talks like that.
Annie Wilkes: THEY DO NOT! At the feedstore do I say, "Oh, now Wally, give me a bag of that F-in' pig feed, and a pound of that bitchly cow corn"? At the bank do I say, "Oh, Mrs. Malenger, here is one big bastard of a check, now give me some of your Christ-ing money!" THERE, LOOK THERE, NOW SEE WHAT YOU MADE ME DO!
It's a great scene, mainly because Kathy Bates is so convincing as the mentally deranged Annie. But it does bring up the sort of cognitive dissonance about swearing. What does it really damage? From a philosophical standpoint, it's kind of odd that we humans make words that are considered taboo in the first place. Words have only the power that people give them. For example, others have already mentioned how what's acceptable has changed, and on that subject, I recall talking to my grandmother once about movies she saw when she was a kid. One of them was Gone with the Wind, and when Clark Cable uttered his famous "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" line, she said there was audible gasp in the theater. I can't even imagine the string of profanities needed to make a modern movie-going audience gasp. Actually, I think a string of profanities would have the opposite impact today, people would likely find it absurd at start laughing. So yes, language evolves, but so does society. Perhaps we've moved beyond assigning such power to words. The only exception I can think of is racial slurs, those are more offensive today to many people than they ever were in the past. It's not uncommon to find elderly folks that drop the N-word, not out of hatred or malice, but because that was just what "everyone" called black people when they were growing up. Granted, some elderly folks that use racial slurs are also racists, but it's not necessarily the case either. Things change, and not everyone can or will adapt.
Bill Hicks said (Score:3, Funny)
- Bill Hicks
Re: (Score:2)
According to my mom from the south, yes, Damn is a swear word. According to anyone I grew up with in new york city 30 years ago, no.
According to my mom crap, "that sucks", "That blows" are all swear words too.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I remember when saying "Raspberries" was a swear war because my parents "knew" i was just substituting one bad word for another... the thought of having something to replace one dirty word was just as dirty...
Re: (Score:2)
"According to my mom from the south, yes, Damn is a swear word"
And I thought it was a technical term in theology.
Re: (Score:2)
Well roger me with a wire brush and call me Brenda!
Re: (Score:2)
Sucks and blows were originally euphemisms for oral sex, specifically homosexual acts. Saying "he sucks" was pretty insulting back in the day.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=suck [etymonline.com]
Re: (Score:2)
That it's not profanity anymore. Is damn considered profanity any longer. At one point that was as harsh as Fuck is today.
Bullshit
Re:Pretty sad. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps, but there's nothing in the phonetic structure of the swear words that helps your thumb feel better. It's just an emotional release. Next time try yelling out the name "Elmo" instead.
Re:Pretty sad. (Score:4, Insightful)
What? How?
What difference exactly does it make if someone exclaims Fuck! instead of Custard!
How is the latter displaying a more advanced vocabulary? And why should anyone care?
Re: (Score:2)
What difference exactly does it make if someone exclaims Fuck! instead of Custard!
How is the latter displaying a more advanced vocabulary? And why should anyone care?
Exclaiming either one is pretty stupid, in my opinion. The only reason anyone cares, is that swearing has generally been regarded as being offensive. It's not the collection of letters or sounds that they represent but the meaning behind those words. What purpose is there in communicating the word for intercourse/fornication/sex/whatever as an exclamation - especially using terminology that a large portion of our culture considers it to be offensive? Is the purpose to offend? What is the point?
Re:Pretty sad. (Score:5, Insightful)
I find that swearing is often very effective at expressing my thoughts and feelings.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I agree. I just wish we Americans had more of the colorful insults of the Queen's English: http://septicscompanion.com/showcat.php?cat=insults [septicscompanion.com] http://www.labnol.org/internet/insult-anyone-in-shakespearean-english/7251/ [labnol.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's only a sign of a lack of emotional self control if they are raised in a culture where it's wrong. Other wise it just weak communications skills.
If every one does it, then it's not a lack of civility.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's down to respect for elders or some similar such thing. If you force kids to be less than a full citizen in as many ways as possible it helps to get them to do what they're told in other ways. It's all part of beating them down and forcing them to conform to the rules of society. Knowing what little bastards a lot of kids are like they will always push the boundaries, so you set the boundaries to be artificially narrow for them then when they probe them, they are less likely to harm themselves.