Unabomber Property Up For Creepy Online Auction 109
coondoggie writes "Ok this is kind of creepy. The US Marshalls Office today said it will hold an online auction of the personal effects of the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski. The auction will run until June 2 and will include personal documents, such as driver's licenses, birth certificates, deeds, checks, academic transcripts, photos, and his handwritten codes; typewriters; tools; clothing; watches; several hundred books; and more than 20,000 pages of written documents, including the original handwritten and typewritten versions of the 'Unabom Manifesto.'"
Not creepy but smart, (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Stupid question, but... will Unabomber fans be sending their payment in by mail?
Re: (Score:1)
Free registration in nationwide creeps database included!
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Fruad (aka fraud) (Score:2)
Telll me something, exactly how does a government care or not care?
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Fraud (Score:1)
Selling off other property to pay restitution to his victims, I don't have a problem with.
None of those things are private (Score:2)
I am disturbed by this as well. Unless Ted Kacynkski signed a waiver to allow the government to auction off what can be considered private records, I don't see how the government should be allowed to do this. Selling off other property to pay restitution to his victims, I don't have a problem with.
As long as you're not a criminal, you don't have to worry about it too much. The government can't take your stuff away and sell it unless you cause them to by, for example, mailing bombs to innocent victims.
None of the items mentioned can be considered private records. Driver's licenses, birth certificates, deeds, and academic transcripts are publicly accessible anyway, even before they become evidence in a criminal trial.
The other items became public information or government property once they were ente
Re:None of those things are private (Score:4, Interesting)
None of the items mentioned can be considered private records. Driver's licenses, birth certificates, deeds, and academic transcripts are publicly accessible anyway, even before they become evidence in a criminal trial.
Birth certificates and academic transcripts are considered private. Except for immediate families of the person but I can assure you that you cannot get these records of individuals from the state. That was part of the BS of the whole Birther controversy with Birthers complaining that somehow Hawaii was making an exception for Obama when it is clear in all states that birth certificates are not public records.
The other items became public information or government property once they were entered into evidence in the court proceedings against him, unless Kaczynski's attorney won a court order to have the evidence sealed or to have the items returned to him - which he didn't.
The existence of property held by the state does not automatically make a piece of property eligible for public viewing. In the many cases, all the state did was to list the property as in their possession as required by law; the state did not list the contents (or make it available to the public) especially if the piece of evidence was not used at trial.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, it doesn't seem as if there's any legal basis to auctioning off a lot of these items.
I assume the theory is that he damaged his victims, and they have a right to sue him, get a judgment, and sell his possessions.
Where does the marshall's office get the right to take property seized for one purpose (evidence in a criminal case), and sell it for another purpose (compensation for victims)? If they wanted to proceed in a legal way, shouldn't someone have brought a civil suit against Kaczynski? Did that hap
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
As long as you're not a criminal, you don't have to worry about it too much. The government can't take your stuff away and sell it unless you cause them to by, for example, mailing bombs to innocent victims.
Its already been decided by the courts, that if a state wants to sell your property to a mall developer, they can seize it from you and you can do nothing about it. So why would you think that the federal government would grant themselves less power?
Re: (Score:1)
Handy rule-of-thumb for would-be fraudsters: avoid using names of famous, infamous, or fictitious people. It makes you rather conspicuous.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You've clearly never signed up for something with a fake name. Today's CS reps, even government staff, are so freakin' ignorant, they actually believe any name you give them.
I've a few friends who get a kick out of doing just that, registering phones, government services, and in one epic stunt a complete set of ID using celebrity or made-up names including:
- Pablo Escobar
- Cosmo Kramer
- LaToya Jackson
- William Shatner
- Tony Montana
- Travis Bickle
- Buck Futter
- Ron Jeremy
- Charles Manson
Whether you attribut
In your face (Score:1)
Re:In your face (Score:5, Interesting)
I find the guy's terrorist activities deeply distasteful, and he certainly deserves to rot in jail for them; but as a theorist of the sociology of technological advance, he is actually pretty underrated...
Re: (Score:2)
As they say, the gap between genius is madness is a very short one. I think Kaczynski is as good an example of that as I've ever seen. Brilliant guy who, unfortunately, didn't have the mental balance or the inner voice to tell him that you have to remain at least somewhat pragmatic and should never take an ideology too far. The only difference between him and, say Lenin or Mao, is that he was a lone nut job in a cabin and not the leader of a mass revolution, and thus was only able to cause a small amount
Re: (Score:3)
Pragmatism means never assuming your ideological assumptions are absolutely right, and allowing yourself to compromise. You call it a cop-out, I call out a corollary to Asimov's famous axiom "Never let your sense of morality prevent you from doing what's right."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not sure I agree with this. You have to look at the greater picture. I don't think the state should harm people. At the same time I would agree with someone who says it is a necessity at times. The problem is it is almost never today a necessity. It is thus an abuse of the privilege. For instance we need not murder people who have committed acts which we consider to be atrocities. I'm talking about people like Saddam, Bin Laden, and other revolutionaries. This includes mass murders, kiddie murders, and
Re: (Score:2)
He failed in part because he was a loner and in part because no one wants a revolution. No matter what anybody says, one man cannot create a revolution. The conditions have to be there. A single man can be the spark, but someone else has to have to spilled the gasoline.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, thanks for that incredibly critique. The only thing missing is you flinging shit around. Well, maybe you are. You sound like the type.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I have to agree. This one is going to blow up in the US Marshal's office face, figuratively speaking. It comes off as petty.
They are going to use the proceedings to compensate the victims. How's that petty?
Re: (Score:2)
I like your irony there. However, it's ok to laugh at some people in cages. ;)
In your face? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Dude didn't think that throwing bombs was an inauthentic attempt at political speech enabled by technology?
Or was his point that we should regress even beyond the invention of explosives, or maybe fire?
Dude was a nutter. Nothing he said is credible, no matter how closely it might randomly match sapient expression.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
"If we urinate on the Koran, it makes us more right," said US Marshal Albert Nájera of the Eastern District of California in a statement.
Creepy (Score:2)
So what's the deal? He was hoarding Halloween decorations and stuff too?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? Please elaborate.
AC seems to be entangled with the is/ought problem [wikipedia.org] while riding a high horse ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Making money off a madman/criminal seems wrong.
And by "making money off of a madman/criminal" you mean selling his stuff to pay restitution to his victims, right? I see nothing wrong with that.
Re: (Score:2)
as opposed to spending money preserving the memory and legacy of a madman, which is SO right.
Re: (Score:1)
Where its seriously wrong is its a reinforcement of the personification of a villain who has creepy people who idolize this sort of behavior. This shit should have all ended up in a dumpster some place instead of glorified like this. I would think the victims would recoil in horror at being giving money from creeps who idolize this guy and his stuff. It seems like a slap in the face, if the victims need money, shouldn't someone have helped them by now instead of waiting for this creepy auction to bear fruit
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see a difference. Both should be sold with the proceeds going to the victims or to the government to help defray the cost of keeping them in prison for the rest of their lives.
Obviously if a museum wanted them, they could bid on them.
What? (Score:2)
Killer Paraphernalia (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Montana Property (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Montana Property (Score:4, Informative)
Kaczynski's Montana property was sold last year. This is an auction of personal property, probably the items that were seized from the cabin as evidence.
Slashdot: nerd news up to the minute... (Score:2)
...too bad CNN has been crying about the Kacynkski auction for 2 WEEKS now.
Not only behind... 2 weeks behind.
Re: (Score:2)
Only two weeks behind? That's not bad for Slashdot. We've had stories posted based off blog postings that have been anywhere from 6 months to more than a year old by the time it hit Slashdot.
Re: (Score:3)
...too bad CNN has been crying about the Kacynkski auction for 2 WEEKS now.
Not only behind... 2 weeks behind.
The editors had to wait until someone blogged about it and then submitted his own blog article to the site.
Re: (Score:2)
all it takes is for enough ignorami to click the + button in the firehose. and there are a LOT of ignorami on /.
Psychological Experiments (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Psychological Experiments (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually the whole idea of this auction comes off a pretty crass and pathetic. The auctioning off of the personal affects of what was clearly a mentally disturbed individual, only claimed as sane by a very distorted US legal system (clearly his actions speak volumes about his lack of mental stability). It's looks like the US marshals office in all of it's jock strap douchiness is celebrating the failure of an ohh evil intellectual, "We will use the technology that Kaczynski railed against" speaks very much of petty jealously.
Celebrating the the turning of mentally unstable people into non-persons by denying them any personal affects is really petty.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Psychological Experiments (Score:4, Insightful)
Nah, you're reading into it more than is there.
Nah, it's standard practice to sell off items seized as part of law enforcement investigations/prosecutions. The only thing notable here is who the property once belonged to.
Re: (Score:2)
Just because it is standard practice doesn't change the fucking point.
Seizing and auctioning of property by law enforcement ON THE MERE SUSPICION* of it being connected with crime is absolutely intended to render certain people as non-persons (aka people without fundamental rights).
Ted Kaczynski is fucking crazy but that doesn't mean his personal property should be allowed to be seized and sold. Seized for the purpose of investigation is entirely different.
* If the police in most of the English speaking wor
Re: (Score:1)
a link for the linkless: http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2000/06/chase.htm [theatlantic.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Here's a link to what you referenced:
Harvard and the Making of the Unabomber
June 2000
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2000/06/chase.htm
Re:Psychological Experiments (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Is this legal? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
What "right" are you talking about?
Isn't the auction to pay off a very very tiny fraction of the damage he has done to his victims? (e.g. medical bills for the survivors)
Re: (Score:1)
Hoodie and glasses (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
don't recall seeing the hoodie (i browed the site a few weeks ago) but there were definitely several pairs of aviator sunglasses
It's a tarp! (Score:1)
Just buy this terrorist's effects... (Score:2)
Just buy this terrorist's effects...
most should have been donated (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
There's no shortage of psychos and crazies. What made Kaczinsky interesting was that he was a very smart psycho -- but even then, there are lots of those. All the interesting stuff he wrote is public record because it was used as evidence during the trial and published in the court proceedings. Ideally they'd sell all the stuff and use the proceeds to help repay medical costs/give disability benefits to the people he injured, but more likely they're going to use it to indirectly defray some of the cost o
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A question was whether he really was crazy or not. Sure he's a criminal, but you don't have to be insane to kill people. Society doesn't like this though and is afraid of the idea of these awful acts like this being performed by rational people. Thus the quickly applied label of insanity, only a madman could act that way. So Oswald is insane, and McVeigh, and Kaczynski, and Osama.
The interesting thing about Kaczynski is that his writings are written very intelligently and rationally, no matter how much
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Time for the Moron Decree (Score:1)
Instead of giving such criminals a name (or worse, a nickname), it's time we start referring to them as "Moron # (sequential number)" and generally not giving them the attention they crave. No more notoriety!
Re: (Score:1)
The thing is, Moron #2202674, someone already thought of that.
Creepy? What? (Score:1)
US Marshals? (Score:2)
Ok, quick question.
Why are the US Martials auctioning off his property? Doesn't it belong to his estate?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Kaczynski is a political prisoner (Score:2)
Everybody who doesn't agree with the dominant power structure in the US, imperialistic capitalism, and the culture around it, is ultimately "insane". Sa
I want the typewriter ... (Score:1)
Not so much for itself, as for a font I would like to offer to the world for filling in any IRS forms.
Hmm. Perhaps someone has already done this, based on published exemplars?
timothy
Many Good Actions (Score:2)
The violence can not be discounted or ignored but this man did have some very valid concerns and had a certain value to society. At the very least we can agree that he consumed very few resources in his personal life and we must admire that part of him.
This is another individual that may need confinement but should be given study tools and allowed to progress as best he can in his mental activities. He might be able to teach us