Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Image

PETA To Launch Pornography Website 348

Posted by samzenpus from the one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other dept.
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are planning on launching an adult oriented website to help protect animals through a mix of animal suffering footage and porn. I'm not sure how mixing the two will win hearts, minds, or naughty bits, but Lindsay Rajt, PETA's associate director of campaigns, seems to think it's a good idea. She says, "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

PETA To Launch Pornography Website More

PETA To Launch Pornography Website

Comments Filter:

  • We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before (Score:5, Funny)

    by elrous0 ( 869638 ) * on Monday September 19, 2011 @01:52PM (#37446346)

    Fuck it, we're going full-on batshit.

    • For once PETA does something I approve of. Yes, get more female celebrities to pose nude! I'm sure it will turn me from an omnivore to a herbivore once I get enough exposure!

      • Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before (Score:5, Insightful)

        by increment1 ( 1722312 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @03:12PM (#37447774)

        One can only hope that too much exposure doesn't result in people becoming sexually aroused by cruelty to animals. I really think that PETA should have thought this through a little bit more.

        • One can only hope that too much exposure doesn't result in people becoming sexually aroused by cruelty to animals. I really think that PETA should have thought this through a little bit more.

          Evidence of thought processes at PETA is pretty thin. No doubt they'll attract almost exclusively either (i) people such as teenage males hopped up on hormones, who will ignore oodles of animal suffering in their quest for a few XXX images, or (ii) people with bizarre fetishes who would actually prefer the blood-splattered animals to be in the XXX-rated images. Perhaps it will even lead to a new genre of kitten-slasher porn or something equally gross (potential replacement for the goatse guy).

          • I now have an overwhelming desire to create such a website and note in the footers/meta data/etc.:
            Inspired by PETA.

            If I do it all CG will I still be beaned (kind of like CP in Aus)?

          • Entirety of /b/ decamping in 5...4...3...

    • Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Kenja ( 541830 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:04PM (#37446594)
      Its PETA, they've been insane since day one. They euthanize animals, while declaring they are for animal rights. Their leder takes insalin derived from canines, while saying that no animals should be used for medical research. They want animals to be treated like humans and be covered by the same laws, which would result in them all being locked up for indecent exposure and public indecency.

      • Re: (Score:3)

        by elrous0 ( 869638 ) *

        They want animals to be treated like humans and be covered by the same laws, which would result in them all being locked up for indecent exposure and public indecency.

        Not to mention all the leg-humping dogs who would be up on sexual assault charges.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by Kid Zero ( 4866 )

        Their leder takes insalin derived from canines, while saying that no animals should be used for medical research.

        They haven't derived "insalin" from Canines in ages. I'm sure their "leder" is using the modern brands of insulin.

      • Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before (Score:4, Insightful)

        by jythie ( 914043 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:58PM (#37447526)
        Euthanize? Try eradicate... part of PETA's mission is the complete destruction of species that have made the mistake of getting along with humans.

      • They want animals to be treated like humans and be covered by the same laws, which would result in them all being locked up for indecent exposure and public indecency.

        Yep, dogs humping in public. Shocking, isn't it? And best not to mention horses... At least cats do it in the dark, if a little noisily.

        Or just visit the zoo on a warm summer day. Most of the male animals have boners, in public, and in front of children. Obviously, they need to be convicted as child-molesting sex criminals. Hmmm, maybe that's why they're already locked up.

    • Nothing says "invite me home to dinner" like roadkill-rolling chronic masturbators.

    • This is gonna backfire (Score:4, Insightful)

      by msobkow ( 48369 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:33PM (#37447130) Homepage Journal

      I've no doubt there are some sick, twisted people out there who are gonna get off on the animal cruelty pics. :(

      • I've no doubt there are some sick, twisted people out there who are gonna get off on the animal cruelty pics. :(

        Exactly. I think their plan might back-fire.

    • Fuck it, we're going full-on batshit.

      What's so funny about this? He's just quoting the third episode where we'll be seeing some hardcore bat-anal.

      • Fuck it, we're going full-on batshit.

        What's so funny about this? He's just quoting the third episode where we'll be seeing some hardcore bat-anal.

        Santorum [urbandictionary.com] is batty? Weirdly appropriate from PETA's viewpoint.

    • Re:We at PETA were only *mostly* crazy before (Score:4, Insightful)

      by neoform ( 551705 ) <djneoform@gmail.com> on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:42PM (#37447252) Homepage

      Nah, they've been full-on for a long time... I realized this when they released a film called "Chickens are people too". The obvious reply to that title is: "No, they aren't."

      • Re: (Score:3)

        by elrous0 ( 869638 ) *

        Sometimes they do things that are so stupid and crazy that I wonder if there isn't some agent provocateur calling the shots at the top. They seem to actual WANT to discredit themselves.

    • Fuck it, we're going full-on batshit.

      ...or illegal. I'm pretty sure this is very blurry line of smut, but I think they may be crossing a legal line.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • You never go full retard!

    • Apparently they want to attract/guide young serial killers.

  • /b (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19, 2011 @01:53PM (#37446380)

    So PETA is creating /b in other words.

  • When PETA thinks it's a good idea... (Score:3)

    by DurendalMac ( 736637 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @01:55PM (#37446400)
    ...you know that it isn't. What an absurdly idiotic joke. Then again, as an above poster said, they're probably going to get an influx of /b/tards that will just fap even harder at this stuff. I hope they leave comments open. They're going to get the opposite response they were hoping for.

    • Re:When PETA thinks it's a good idea... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:06PM (#37446654)

      I was thinking the same things, perhaps this will only exacerbate the problem.
      "Thanks a lot PETA, I can't get off unless I kill an animal now!"

    • 4chan has already evolved this ( randomly, ergo /b/ ) and the evolutionary outcome was people who can only fap to shocking images of puppies having their heads cutoff juxtaposed with teen webcams or pornographic images of my little ponies.....

      I don't think Rule 34 should ever be a marketing campaign.

      Why PETA thinks this is a good outcome, I don't know.

      • I came here for Rule 34, and I got it. So now, we're deliberately trying to see if we can get people to like violence and porn... but with animals.(the violence) And, to get everyone behind it under the guise of something else and quite opposite as well... evil lords over stupidity everyday.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Belial6 ( 794905 )
      Unless they have some weird notion that when this bring exactly the kind of people we all know it will, they will start making claims that all animal killing if for sexual gratification by perverts. I could see them going there.

  • I don't even...

  • Sh*ting D*ck Nipples (Score:4, Funny)

    by 0racle ( 667029 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @01:57PM (#37446442)

    some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing

    So they're implementing Encyclopedia Dramatica?

  • So they're training people to beat off to pictures of animal suffering?

    • That's what I thought too. Have they heard of Ivan Pavlov?

      Plus, forget about mistreating animals; there's already enough porn in which women are degraded and abused.

  • The website's motto (Score:5, Funny)

    by killmenow ( 184444 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @01:59PM (#37446500)
    PETAPORN.COM: Where it's OK to beat your meat.

  • Immoral Dilemma (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:02PM (#37446558)

    Nothing like humiliating women for the ethical treatment of animals.

    • This whole idea is pretty stupid - I think it falls into the same trap as "educational video games". Namely, that if you assume that people like something merely because of what it is (video games and/or porn) and that you can merely attach extra crap onto that to feed it to them. Both video games and porn, contrary to popular belief, have quality levels that people do pay attention to, and attaching extra crap harms that quality.

      That aside, it's a silly prudish notion to think that pornography is any mor

      • Re:Immoral Dilemma (Score:4, Insightful)

        by characterZer0 ( 138196 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:29PM (#37447046)

        That aside, it's a silly prudish notion to think that pornography is any more or less humiliating than any other performance art.

        Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in the local theater's production of Hamlet?

        Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

        • Re:Immoral Dilemma (Score:5, Informative)

          by Killjoy_NL ( 719667 ) <slashdot AT remco DOT palli DOT nl> on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:38PM (#37447180)

          Yes to both questions, but I am dutch, maybe we have less hangups about it.
          I don't think that there is anything wrong with playing in a porno or even in a theatre production.
          I would not watch the porn with them in it though.

        • Re:Immoral Dilemma (Score:5, Interesting)

          by DaFallus ( 805248 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @03:39PM (#37448244)

          Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in the local theater's production of Hamlet?

          Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

          Why should my mother or my sister give a shit about what I'm ok with? How about what they're ok with? Some people aren't ok with their daughters learning math, or about evolution...

        • Would you be okay with your mother, wife, or daughter performing in a porn flick?

          I would not be ok with them being PETA members. However I would just have to accept that they live their own lives, wouldn't I?

        • No, and yes.

          What? Porn's porn. Local theater is terrible.

    • Totally agree.
      Advocacy Group Decries PETA's Inhumane Treatment Of Women
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2z2lTUR5Ao [youtube.com]

  • Keep those PETAfiles off the internet (Score:4, Funny)

    by jpvlsmv ( 583001 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:03PM (#37446572) Homepage Journal

    And get that Kitty porn off my screen, damnit.

    --Joe

  • I'm pretty sure that embracing the root zone poisoning .xxx domain wankers is not ever going to earn them enough cash to help a single animal in need. This is a total waste of time and money IMNSHO. The kind of story you'd expect to see in very-late March or very-early April, but that doesn't fit the calendar in that particular universe I inhabit.

  • Hustler did this (Score:5, Informative)

    by Cruciform ( 42896 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:04PM (#37446590) Homepage

    In the 80s, when we were teens sneaking copies of Hustler away from older brothers or swapping with neighbors I remember seeing several issues with both porn and horrible war footage.

    Flynt was not afraid to publish articles showing exactly what kind of destruction the US was, or had been, wreaking overseas. And he showed the cost it had on the soldiers as well.

    The nudity and sex were not the obscenity. The murder of civilians and the treatment of those who had signed up to serve the country was the real obscenity.

  • ....is this new website supposed to appeal to people who get excited with both naked women and abused animals? Not sure if there is such a thing, but I know there is a "genre" of porn catering to people who like images of abused women, so it's possible.

  • mixing vids? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by danbuter ( 2019760 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:04PM (#37446608)
    So halfway through the sex scene, right when you're about to cum, it will switch to cows being slaughtered?

    • If you'd like to see the rest of this scene, sign our petition declaring animals people.

      Tomorrow's Headline: "PETA succeeds in getting a million signatures for their latest petition."

      (Of course, the above headline's in their heads. The real headline would be "Annoyed porn-surfers flee PETA site. Find free non-animal-cruelty-message-filled porn elsewhere.")

    • I'd almost rather see that than have them cut to the dude's face as they usually do.

  • "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."

    Yeah, 'cuz nobody would expect that from PETA.

  • Yes obviously it's stupid, that's the point (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LighterShadeOfBlack ( 1011407 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:09PM (#37446704) Homepage

    Of course this is ridiculously idiotic. That's just what they're going for. Say something batshit insane that'll provoke media coverage and public reaction to show people that PETA still exists and believes in ending the suffering of animals or whatever. They have no intention of actually doing this, it's just another cynical attention-grabbing statement to remind people about PETA.

    Nothing to see here, just Slashdot getting trolled.

  • porn with PETA ads (Score:3)

    by ThorGod ( 456163 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:09PM (#37446716) Journal

    What they're planning, from the article:

    Visitors to the X-rated site will initially be presented with pornographic content as well as images from PETA's salacious ads and campaigns, Rajt said. Those images will be followed by pictures and video shot undercover of the mistreatment of animals. The site will also include links to vegetarian and vegan – using no animal products – starter kits as well as recipes.

    Either way, I don't see how this works out well for their message. How about online streaming of tv shows that hulu wont stream for free - supplemented with peta ads? Or, a paypal service - watch 15 minutes of peta ads, take a quiz on their policies, pass, and get $5? The porn angle is just too strange.

    • It doesn't, but PETA is so far removed from reality now that I don't really think it registers with them. They've truly left behind any notions of sanity, let alone any notion of sensible marketing, that it's all irrelevant now. This is so blindingly nuts that I think maybe the time has come to commit their board of directors to the insane asylum. I can only imagine that there is some semi-normal fraction of PETA's support base that's looking at this and going "WTF???"

      • I can only imagine that there is some semi-normal fraction of PETA's support base that's looking at this and going "WTF???"

        No, there is no semi-normal fraction of the support base.

  • I'm 99% sure there's a decent goatse joke in here somewhere.

    I'm also 100% sure this is old news. Consumerist and the Daily Mail reported on it a month ago.

  • Singing! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Barny ( 103770 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:14PM (#37446810) Journal

    Supersadomasochistinecrobestiality.

    Its when you get a hard-on making Lassie a fatality!

  • ...some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site.

    Aaaand you just ruined it. So yeah, probably not going to surprise anyone now. And what in fuckery are they even trying to do?

    Trying to wrap my head around what they hope to accomplish has annoyed me so much, I'm going to go out right now and buy a huge freakin steak for dinner, so I can chew on chunks of nearly-raw beef while I think of other ways to piss PETA off.

  • Maybe PETA will be taping its internal operations (Score:3)

    by Quila ( 201335 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:21PM (#37446916)

    After all, PETA is one of the most prolific killers of animals in the country.

  • I wanted to make sure it wasn't April 1st.

  • All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. blah blah blah

    Hey, is this enough comment to pass the filter that says I have to say something more than what I can squeeze into the subject line?

  • Porn is nothing new for PETA. This happened at Burning Man in 2006:

    First off, when it comes to art at Burning Man, pretty much anything goes. However, PETA's "art" consisted of a film loop of pigs being beaten to death, shown on a 15-foot screen, complete with sound. They placed this on the Esplanade, Burning Man's "main street." My camp was next door, and while we didn't actually do any of the following pranks, thinking them up was great fun.

    Our first prank was to go over with a plate of veal chops:

    Us

  • This will backfire like bra-burning, and be lulzworthy into the bargain.

  • makes sense.... (Score:3)

    by jythie ( 914043 ) on Monday September 19, 2011 @02:56PM (#37447494)
    Well, PETA has always been more about getting laid then actually helping animals.. so this fits their pattern quite nicely.
  • Beavers, pussies and goatses will be just some of the things on offer.

  • I guess they need more money to fund their mobile euthanasia machines. If you give an animal to PETA, its probably dead before they leave the driveway.

    http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ [petakillsanimals.com]

  • PETA's more about getting attention than they are about the ethical treatment of animals. This move just further proves that.

  • They want to shock people.

    On the internet.

    With graphic images.

    On a porn site.

    Weeeeeelll... its good to have goals I guess. Good luck with that one.

  • There was a local band called Pleasuretech that played videos during their concerts that included a medley of explosions, politician's speeches and hardcore porn. It was always fun when the cops would roll in and shut down the show (not that they had many before disbanding).

    Fun times.

    • Oh, I forgot to add that the videos included animals being dismembered and gutted in slaughter houses. There might have been some horror movie clips mixed in there too. Hard to tell.

  • Will it be self-made? Will there be hot PETA chicks doing porn?

Slashdot Top Deals

Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man -- who has no gills. -- Ambrose Bierce

Close