Man Builds Fully-Functional Boeing 737 Flight Simulator In His Son's Bedroom 128
laejoh writes "An aeroplane enthusiast has taken his obsession a step further than most after using his son's bedroom to build a Boeing 737 flight simulator that exactly mimics the real thing. Laurent Aigon, 40, from Lacanau in France, has spent the last five years collecting and buying components from around the world with best friend and fellow enthusiast (obviously) Jean-Paul Dupuy. The pair spent thousands of euros on internet orders for bits and pieces to construct the simulator – which is so realistic that the Institute of Aircraft Maintenance at Bordeaux-Merignac Airport asked him to give a lecture on his achievement. Mr Aigon has since schooled himself in all the procedures for take off and landing and says he is able to fly his 'plane' just like a real-life pilot."
Can't That Get You Marked as a Terrorist, Now? :-) (Score:5, Insightful)
But aside all that, what a GREAT dad!
Pretty cool. Guess after SFO, he's glad it wasn't a 777.
Re: (Score:2)
But aside all that, what a GREAT dad!
Yes, he built a cockpit in his son's bedroom. What TFA didn't say is that the entry door is located in his own bedroom.
Get out of my room! (Score:2)
Yeah. Great Dad. Uses his son's bedroom as a playroom for his hobby with his pal.
Son may be ok about it just now, but what happens when he decides he's too old for his father's toys?
Re: (Score:1)
For masturbation. That's what I mean.
Even if the kid has not yet reached that age, I'm sure he still needs sleep. And if you've ever been working on a pr
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the kid has the luxury of practicing to be a member of the mile high club I guess.
I doubt the kid is that old. He was probably just born when the project started so it might be a few years before he is aware of that stuff. But hey, this is in France so who knows.
Re: (Score:3)
737?
url:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/06/sfo-airport-asiana-crash_n_3555482.html
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
It was an Airbus 757.
Re: (Score:2)
Airbusses are nice. If you hit turbulence? They are "flexier" than Boeings. Unsettling, but smoother.
The overhead bins are much taller, and better shaped. The ceilings seem less enclosed.
Good planes.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry, Airbuses have better safety track than Boeings. You'll be fine.
This,
The biggest difference between the A330 and the B777 is that the B777 crams in an extra seat per row.
Airline and pilot are the big factors in determining if a plane is safe or not.
I've got my first flight in an A380 coming up and I _am_ looking forward to that (just not the other 500 passengers I'll have to be around).
Re: (Score:2)
I've flown on AirFrance's first A380, great plane. Yeah it's massive, but the seating was quite comfortable and the in flight entertainment options were great for a cross ocean trip from Paris to JFK. Enjoy the trip.
Re:Can't That Get You Marked as a Terrorist, Now? (Score:4, Informative)
It was a Boeing 777.
VERY good airplane. (Direct quote from an American Airlines 777 First Officer: "Sweetest-flying airplane I ever flew!" Direct quote from a very senior American Airlines 777 Captain: "10 years in 757/767. First time I got in the 777, I realized they'd fixed things I hadn't realized had been bugging me.")
Re:Can't That Get You Marked as a Terrorist, Now? (Score:5, Funny)
It was a Boeing 777.
VERY good airplane. (Direct quote from an American Airlines 777 First Officer: "Sweetest-flying airplane I ever flew!" Direct quote from a very senior American Airlines 777 Captain: "10 years in 757/767. First time I got in the 777, I realized they'd fixed things I hadn't realized had been bugging me.")
****** A+++++ Wuld fly again
Re: (Score:2)
Awesome dad (Score:5, Funny)
Now witness the capabilities of this fully operational 737 flight simulation!
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Just better hope he's not middle eastern, otherwise homeland security might confiscate it.
(Yeah I know, a very un-PC joke, I level them all the time against my Iranian friend so I'm used to it.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Awesome dad (Score:1)
They're not all white Catholics, you know.
Re: (Score:3)
Exactly mimics the real thing? (Score:1)
I didn't see any hydraulics for mimicking the pitch, yaw, and roll.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Exactly mimics the real thing? (Score:1)
What do you mean ? When I fly (passenger) I feel the take off and landing up/down dip and the left / right after take off
Re: (Score:2)
Hence "the only axis that is of much use is the pitch". You may want to brush up on your 6 degrees of freedom.
He just gets done saying that he can feel both pitch and roll and your response is "yes, I said you only need pitch"? Fail, fail.
Re: (Score:2)
That's if it's flown correctly. If you don't make coordinated turns,you'll feel it. Without the simulator on a moving platform, you wouldn't know the difference.
Re: (Score:2)
If it's an option that you can turn on, but you fail to turn it on, or that part of the system fails, you wouldn't know the difference.
It's cute as a expensive toy. Not so hot as a pilot trainer, which seems is what he intended it to be.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't see any hydraulics for mimicking the pitch, yaw, and roll.
That was my first thought too, but then I thought about naval simulators. I've been in a few of those, which are very much just large rooms with a lot of screens, and usually some raked seating at the back. They don't move at all, but it's funny to watch those standing on the "bridge" as they sway from side to side to keep their feet in rough seas. Yes, real simulators move around, but a lot can be achieved without.
Re: (Score:2)
No Stewart platform... (Score:3)
Re:No Stewart platform... (Score:5, Interesting)
Not really.
It was proven decades ago that you didn't need a motion base under a flight simulator if your visual scene generator was good enough.
What is interesting is that the visual scene doesn't have to be all that good.
Re:No Stewart platform... (Score:5, Interesting)
Quite true. There was an attraction at Disneyland when I was a kid called Circle-Vision 360. It was basically a round room with screens arranged in a circle around you. They shot scenes with a 360 degree camera setup, often from the top of a car or a plane, and played them on the screens. You really felt the sensation of motion.
The fun part was watching people leaning left and right as the motion in the scene went the other direction. There were actually hand rails for people to hang on to so they didn't topple over.
Re: (Score:3)
well technically you don't "need" the real buttons either.. but the motions is what I think of as being the qualifier for fully functional, because then it would have functional parity with full fledged commercial simulators.
Re:No Stewart platform... (Score:4, Insightful)
It was proven decades ago that you didn't need a motion base under a flight simulator if your visual scene generator was good enough.
Don't need it to do what? To train pilots to operate the flight management system you don't need motion much, but you don't need an outside visual for that either. Manual control behaviour on the other hand has been shown again and again to benefit from motion cues. What you claim to have been proven long ago is in fact not settled at all in the simulation community. Regulations also still require a motion system for high-end training simulators and there's a reason for that.
isn't that child abuse? (Score:1)
...using his son's bedroom to build a Boeing 737 flight simulator that exactly mimics the real thing.
5 years of noisy jet takeoffs.
ground: "say type aircraft" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
On an Airbus, the controls are simply tied to LCD and haptic feedback devices. An Airbus simulator and a real Airbus cockpit are exactly the same thing--a really expensive joystick connected to an XBox. What's the fun in that?
Re:ground: "say type aircraft" (Score:4, Interesting)
The choice was probably driven largely by availability of cockpit parts. There is an impressive amount of 737s out there in various states of operation.
Re: (Score:1)
That's true, but many with different cockpit setups. The 737 classic and NG models have seen a huge jump in technology, even for being largely the same plane.
Re: ground: "say type aircraft" (Score:2)
That's cool and all... (Score:5, Interesting)
But haven't dozens of people already done this over the years? For example - http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/04/18/2036248/man-builds-737-simulator-in-a-garage [slashdot.org]
I had a good friend who was the chief engineer for a major multi-national telecommunications company, who laid out around half a million building a fully functional 747 cockpit in his basement - and that was back in '99. Even had a seat and controls for the navigator.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly what I was thinking. The only thing new about this is the setting.
Re: (Score:2)
But haven't dozens of people already done this over the years?
I reckon this demonstrates French waiters [gizmodo.com] may have the same technical prowless as US private pilots [mercurynews.com] /.-ers how call themself geeks but all they can do is attempts of lame humor... vous defier dire ce n'est pas comme ca...
(and heaps more than a bunch of
G'day, mate, good on you!)
Re: (Score:2)
There was no attempt at humor in my post. BTW, the person I just referenced who built one in his basement is both a geek and a Slashdotter, so really not sure what point you're trying to make? That french waiters, private pilots, AND geeks, have the same potential technical prowess? That's exactly what I was pointing out - this isn't really news as it's been done by a large variety of people already. Pretty much anyone with the time, money and passion could throw this together. But all you're pointing out i
Re: (Score:3)
There was no attempt at humor in my post. BTW, the person I just referenced who built one in his basement is both a geek and a Slashdotter, so really not sure what point you're trying to make?
No, indeed, you didn't. My apologies for "riding" on your post with my rants
(feelings got mixed into my main point, I realise now it was a wrong place to express my displeasure to post like:
* Authenticity [slashdot.org] - questioning the authenticity of the seats cover
* Too much time in his hands [slashdot.org] - questioning his sex life
* Re: what software [slashdot.org] - implying he doesn't know what flight simulator he uses
* Figures [slashdot.org] - complaining a pho
Re: (Score:2)
I see - yes, those comments do seem extremely petty in the context of what is a fairly remarkable feat of dedication, and certainly to the individual involved would be a major milestone.
Re: (Score:2)
In fairness, the one about "Authenticity" of the sheepskin covers had a reply with a link showing a cockpit with seemingly-similar seat covers, so I learned something there.
And the one about which software it ran was ok for Slashdot, although the reply to it, "He probably doesn't even know" was snotty.
Re: (Score:2)
really not sure what point you're trying to make?
Perhaps that the French tip well?
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, and didn't some guy in Japan build a 737 or 747 cockpit sim with such a complete cabin interior that he was asked to loan the use of it to a TV drama for a set? I remember reading something to that effect several years ago...
Re: (Score:2)
Much easier to do today - still not cheap, but many of the components can actually be bought (USB interfaces), and companies now sell software to fully emulate many of the systems.
One thing this system is missing is a collimated display. That adds a lot of realism from what I've heard. Those are expensive if you want to buy them, but people are starting to DIY them.
Well, not *FULLY* functional (Score:2)
Lot of work (Score:5, Funny)
This makes me feel lame - I haven't even finished redoing the bathroom.
Authenticity (Score:1)
Re:Authenticity (Score:5, Informative)
e.g. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Copa-Airlines-Colombia/Boeing-737-7V3/2288558/&sid=501f1a8b3c010f0b25433bb222ebff2b [airliners.net]
The sad part is... (Score:2)
His son has no interest in airplanes, and his dad is forcing it on him.
I remember my dad taking the family to the airport to watch the planes take off and land for hours at a time; thank god they closed the observation area after 9/11.
Re: (Score:2)
This is pretty much how I interpret his actions after reading the article. It's not like he's using the son's room after the boy moved out, the kid still sleeps in a bunk bed in the corner of the room - when his dad isn't using it to show off.
Re:The sad part is... (Score:4, Funny)
Just like model trains and boobs... claimed to be for the kids, but the dads are playing with them.
what a jerk (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
No... there's no way this guy is still married.
Not one of the better DIY jobs (Score:4, Insightful)
The display in particular is pretty shoddy. I've seen much much better out there in terms of DIY flightsims.
Oh, and to this line in TFA:
"He also has interest from a couple of major aircraft manufacturers who want to use his creation to simulate various scenarios."
No, he doesn't. Aircraft manufacturers have no interest whatsoever in this.
Re:Not one of the better DIY jobs (Score:4, Funny)
Mod parent up. Every airline has massively better simulators.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All of the various scenarios tend to wreak havoc on the simulation equipment, they'd like to test the fire extinguishers on his rig instead of theirs.
Re: (Score:3)
That's what I was thinking too. It looked like the guy was the single source of information. He probably tells everyone the same things..
Boeing would be the only aircraft manufacturer interested in using a Boeing simulator. They can make better ones themselves, since they have the engineers, the parts supply, and the budget, to do it right. Theirs also wouldn't include a bunk bed jammed in the corner, nor the trivialized child.
Too much time on his hands (Score:1)
This guy definitely has too much time on his hands. But given that this fellow seems to have this incredible obsession, how did he managed to find the time to have sex to even have a son to put in a bedroom that the poor kid can't even use except for sleeping.
Re: (Score:2)
son to put in a bedroom that the poor kid can't even use except for sleeping
What are you talking about, this kid has got the world's greatest toy in his bedroom!
Re: (Score:3)
Well, it *COULD* have been a great toy... if his son seemed to show any interest in the simulator, or airplanes in general. According to TFA, it's "unclear" what his son thinks.
As it sits right now, it's a toy for the dad. He should have constructed this in his garage... not his son's bedroom unless the boy was actively interested in this sort of thing.
Re: (Score:2)
You really think he lets his son even get near that?
Your dad obviously was not obsessed with model trains. Friend of mine had to suffer from one, he had the coolest model train kit on earth (dedicated a whole room to it), but his kids were not allowed in there, he was afraid they could "ruin" it.
Re: (Score:2)
A likely question from uncultured Americans!
menage a trois is a peculiarly French custom. (accents omitted on account of /. horrible unicode support.) The man doesn't need time, he just needs a partner.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe he doesn't watch TV 8 hours a day, like all other intelligent people are doing.
What software? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Undoubtedly, but he probably doesn't know that.
Figures (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
They were knocked loose by turbulence. Geez.
Call the N S A (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ya, well... (Score:5, Funny)
I was going to re-build my 787 simulator, but the fire department won't let me.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
You fucking asshole! Now my keyboard and monitor was sprayed with my morning coffee....
Re: (Score:2)
Spray some more: http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/518971-ethiopean-787-fire-heathrow-11.html#post7939225 [pprune.org]
How soon before... (Score:1)
And then Asiana contacts him about training their pilots on the cheap(er)? Hehe.
Big FS projects (Score:4, Interesting)
I've seen several of these flight sim projects. One part of me understands completely why the people who build them build them (I have enough hobbies that others think are a complete waste of time and money to understand entirely why people building flight sims like this want to do it), but another part of my brain is saying "for the money and time invested, you can actually build your own real, flying aircraft you can pilot yourself, and the graphics and frame rate are a lot lot better!".
Kind of reminds me. About a year before they closed Meigs in Chicago (which used to be the default start airport in Microsoft Flight Simulator), I flew in there for real in my elderly Cessna 140. I was kind of surprised when the frame rate didn't slow to about 10 fps when all the buildings of Chicago hoved into view :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Completely off topic, but I was curious about the link in your sig so I clicked on it and it took me to a seemingly old site for a interesting space game. Is that still viable because I saw this "The page you requested could not be found. Perhaps it was attacked by a thargoid?" though I could link to download. Looks like fun (not that I have time).
To your comment, I am also a Private Pilot who started out with MSFS (4.0), but progressed into the real thing. Turns out the real thing was very expensive and
Re: (Score:3)
I've seen several of these flight sim projects. One part of me understands completely why the people who build them build them (I have enough hobbies that others think are a complete waste of time and money to understand entirely why people building flight sims like this want to do it), but another part of my brain is saying "for the money and time invested, you can actually build your own real, flying aircraft you can pilot yourself, and the graphics and frame rate are a lot lot better!".
You might be able to build or fly your own general-aviation aircraft, but you cannot build and fly your own 737 or any jetliner, which is the type of aircraft these guys are clearly interested in.
I flightsim myself, obviously not to such a degree, and there's another reason I do simming instead of actual flying, that I think they share as well: tinkering with the hardware and software is sometimes just as enjoyable as the actual flying. In their case it's the thrill of hunting for right parts and then integ
Qualifiers (Score:4, Interesting)
...that exactly mimics the real thing....which is so realistic that the Institute of Aircraft Maintenance at Bordeaux-Merignac Airport asked him to give a lecture on his achievement....He also has interest from a couple of major aircraft manufacturers who want to use his creation to simulate various scenarios...
I maintain and build flight simulators and synthetic trainers all over the world, from France to China and the same again for approvals with regulators. This thing wouldn't even reach class C let alone class D so exactly mimics is bullshit, even class D can't exactly mimic everything. Even if you follow manuals to the letter, things like control workflow and timings are always off, that's why you can even get class C equipment approved even if some of the cockpit control workflow is actually wrong. There are about one hundred of these sorts of in-house setups like this in homes around the world now, even more if you include those which don't use actual cockpit components. Hardware isn't the problem these days with flight sims and synth trainers, hell, I've seen 6DOF motion class C trainers (with projected wrap-around SPOV visuals, none of this monitor crap) that run off one Core i7 system with all I/O (including motion, excluding visuals) being handled by USB! The real problem is the software, that's where all the limitations lie as too much of it is off the shelf software or components all hobbled together, even the stuff from multi-billion dollar US defence contractors whose names I'd love to spill but alas...
Without validation, it's only a cool toy (Score:2)
No. he's proven he's able to fly his simulator, not the real aircraft. An actual training flight simulator goes through an exhaustive validation to ensure it is accurately reproducing the aircraft within the envelope of interest. While he may have been able to get real cockpit parts to get the look of the real cockpit, there's no guarantee that his simulator r
Parts of the story left out (Score:3)
The title should be... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey c'mon man.. At least he got the damn thing out of the garage [slashdot.org]
Re:I'm sure I'll hit my posting limit soon (Score:4, Insightful)
No mention of the software used anywhere and no speculation.
One of the pictures looks like a windows desktop, so one would assume one of the Flight Simulator programs, most likely Flight Simulator X. Anyone who messes with the stuff would probably have assumed that from the setup. It's like speculating that the fuel in your car's gas tank is unleaded. It may be a technical detail, but uninteresting and a foregone conclusion anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)