Ear Grown From Van Gogh DNA On Display 64
First time accepted submitter afeeney (719690) writes 'The Centre for Art and Media in Karlsruhe, Germany, is displaying an ear grown from DNA contributed by a relative of artist Vincent Van Gogh. The Center said artist Diemut Strebe made the replica using living cells from Lieuwe van Gogh, the great-great-grandson of Vincent’s brother Theo. Using a 3D-printer, the cells were shaped to resemble the ear that Vincent van Gogh is said to have cut off during a psychotic episode in 1888. “I use science basically like a type of brush, like Vincent used paint,” Strebe told The Associated Press. Historians argue about whether Van Gogh cut off his own ear and if so, why, but it remains one of the most famous acts of self-mutilation in the Western world.'
Re: (Score:3)
It is perfectly alright to have toads in your hat , so long as they are not soaked in Cadmium and mineral spirits.
Cadmium, is bad shit, slowly absorbed by fondling your paint rag then running your fingers through your hair, picking your nose, eating without washing and even scrubbing the pigment off your hands with mineral spirits which carry it into the bloodstream. Starry Night was a hallucinatory painting indicative of the damage being suffered.
Not to worry though, painters, real Cadmium hasnt been used
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, they need the lead for pencils.
Re: (Score:2)
I do not have toads in my hat! Se... well, lookie there.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Physics on a stick (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
But is is Jackson's real hair?
Re:Physics on a stick (Score:4, Funny)
I saw a bunch of famous peoples heads kept alive in jars.
Re: (Score:2)
You watch far too much Futurama :)
Re: (Score:1)
You watch far too much Futurama :)
I posit that it is impossible to watch too much Futurama.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, what's so fucking great about using a relatives DNA?
It's art, in the same sense as it is art when David Blaine tries to impress people by sitting in a Faraday cage for while, or when somebody can sell a rotting pig's carcass for millions of dollars.
I can't see it myself - but maybe I'm just not sensitive enough. To me art is something that induces you to think or feel more deeply about something important by demonstrating something 'deep', and as far as I can see, what a lot of modern art demonstrates is simply the gullibility of certain people with more mon
Re: (Score:2)
To me art is something that induces you to think or feel more deeply about something important by demonstrating something 'deep'...
That's an extremely narrow definition of art. To many people, art isn't something rare, deep and important that you go to appreciate, it's something you can appreciate anywhere, any time. Is the song "Happy" art? Most people would say yes, and I'd agree. How about that neighborhood mural of Julius Erving in Philadelphia? I'm not a basketball fan, but yeah, I'd say it is. Is Tchaikovsky's Violin Concerto art? I think it's the finest piece of art ever created.
How about a piece alluded to by an earlier
Re: (Score:3)
How about a piece alluded to by an earlier post in this thread, "Piss Christ", a crucifix in a jar of urine? Well, I think that, along Marcel Duchamp's "Fountain", which was just a urinal are art also.
Ah yes, the "Whatever you can get away with" school of art.
Which unfortunately leads to a carny/rube relationship with a person putting a dead cow on display, and then the critics stumbling to assess the dead cow in strange and mysterious ways.
Obviously the dead cow and it's putrification process is not in the least creative. The creative process is the grifter who put the dead cow there making the critics do his/her bidding.
It's a exceptionally silly game, in the end, a sort of cockamamie performance
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But it is silly and at the utter depths of banality, and in the end, existing only to provoke. not to be admired.
Except for those who like Goatse, or two girls, one cup, perhaps. There's some provocative high art, yes no?
Because in the e
Re: (Score:3)
This is like arguing religion.
Re: (Score:2)
Then the word 'art' is meaningless.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
However, the great thing about art is you're not obliged to agree with anyone.
And the bad thing is that there are those that will tax your wealth to pay for it anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
However, the great thing about art is you're not obliged to agree with anyone.
And the bad thing is that there are those that will tax your wealth to pay for it anyway.
Yes, because people should only be taxed to support things they personally agree with. Where do I get the refund for my share of the $1.1 Trillion the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter?
Re: (Score:2)
That's a travesty too. For much the same reasons.
Re: (Score:3)
The estate of John Holmes has been tossing around the idea of cloned penii to be used for transplant and are furiously sampling DNA from amongst the family.
If you have a right foot and a left foot, it only makes sense to have a foot hanging between them. Be the life of the party! Impress girls! Quit stuffing potatoes down your shorts and get the real thing!
Van Gogh DNA, huh? (Score:2, Funny)
I am your father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate.
Ears come in handy (Score:2)
Hey bro... (Score:2)
Ear speaks: (Score:1)
"Since I'm alive again, where's my damned royalty check!"
Psssh (Score:4, Funny)
Not even grown on a mouse's back? Come on!
Not much of Van Gogh's DNA (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/in... [wolframalpha.com]
Only 1/64th blood relation.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not much of Van Gogh's DNA (Score:4, Informative)
using living cells from Lieuwe van Gogh
The title says "Van Gogh DNA". Misleading, but not a lie.
Since the rest of Van Gogh isn't around, (Score:3)
Stir in a little melatonin and give the ear to Evander Holyfield.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
So the ear cut the body off first?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Tetsuooooo! (Score:2)
Anyone else think the art piece itself looks like the contents of one of the Akira sample canisters? Maybe she can make some more of them...just in time for the things to be buried in a secret military installation beneath the construction site for the 2020 Olympics venue. :P
Come on guys (Score:1)
Inheritence (Score:2)
Follow-up projects (Score:2)
Photo (Score:1)
Wouldn't it be easier to just take a photo of the relative's ear?
“I use science basically like a type of brus (Score:1)
Can't wait (Score:1)
lend me your ears (Score:1)
Ghouls gots art? (Score:2)
Grew an ear? (Score:2)
Growing a blob of building material then using a 3D printer to make a shape out of it does not count as 'growing an ear' to me.
One chromosome (Score:2)
If they are lucky. We need to get over the myth of the "blood relative."