Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Math Idle

'When a Newspaper Publishes an Unsolvable Puzzle' (10zenmonkeys.com) 23

Slashdot reader DevNull127 writes: It's a newspaper puzzle that's like Sudoku, except it's impossible. [Sort of...] They call it "The Challenger" puzzle — but when the newspaper leaves out a crucial instruction, you can end up searching forever for a unique solution which doesn't exist!

"If you're thinking 'This could be a 9 or an 8....' — you're right!" complains Lou Cabron. "Everyone's a winner today! Just start scribbling in numbers! And you'd be a fool to try to keep narrowing them down by, say, using your math and logic skills. A fool like me..." (Albeit a fool who once solved a Sudoku puzzle entirely in his head.) But two hours of frustration later — and one night of bad dreams — he's stumbled onto the web page of Dr. Robert J. Lopez, an emeritus math professor in Indiana, who's calculated that in fact Challenger puzzles can have up to 190 solutions... and there's more than one solution for more than 97% of them!

At the end of the day, it becomes an appreciation for the local newspaper, and the puzzles they run next to the funnies. But with a friendly reminder "that they ought to honor and respect that love — by always providing the complete instructions."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

'When a Newspaper Publishes an Unsolvable Puzzle'

Comments Filter:
  • by TheNameOfNick ( 7286618 ) on Sunday December 12, 2021 @10:44AM (#62072383)

    It just means you get to choose a solution.

    • Right. Wtf... how is lacking a singular solution mean it's unsolvable. When did the concept of solution become so myopic.

      Btw, I did not see that coming...

      • It's in the word "solution"

        If you've ever tried a sudoku with multiple solutions, unless it specifically says multiple solutions might be possible, it's badly-designed. I don't know whether it's in the spec, but as far as I'm concerned, a sudoku or other number puzzle should have a singular solution that you can figure out logically.

      • by narcc ( 412956 )

        The instant the player is forced to guess in a Sudoku, it stops being a puzzle. If you can't solve it logically, it's unsolvable as a puzzle.

        It's like a crossword with no clues. You could brute-force a "solution", sure, but it doesn't make sense to call it a 'puzzle' at that point as the puzzle part has been removed.

        • > If you can't solve it logically, it's unsolvable as a puzzle.

          Huh? What does the word unsolvable mean?

          NO solution.

          if there ARE solutions then it is solvable. It doesn't matter HOW you come to the solution.

          • by narcc ( 412956 )

            This isn't that difficult. Try reading my post again.

            • What part of the definition of puzzle [merriam-webster.com] do you not understand?

              to attempt a solution of a puzzle by guesswork or experiment

              If you have to resort to guessing that doesn't change the fact that it a puzzle. Guessing isn't fun -- but you STILL have puzzle. You are conflating a bad puzzle with no puzzle.

              If a puzzle has multiple solutions that doesn't make in "unsolvable" -- probably just "not interesting", "bad", "not fun", etc.

              • by narcc ( 412956 )

                I strongly disagree with that absurd definition. Guessing and puzzling are nothing alike. Randomly turning a Rubik's cube is not the same as solving one.

                Introducing guessing changes the nature of the activity so much that it's wrong to even call it a Sudoku puzzle.

                Maybe you don't know what a solution is? The solution to a 15 puzzle is the sequence of moves necessary to move from the initial scrambled state to a completed state, not the final state itself. I thought this was obvious. If you were strugg

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by TeddyRick ( 6515134 )
      Thanks.. I was so confused reading the article trying to figure out why he couldn't solve it at all.

      The title to the article is very misleading.. I read it trying to see why it was unsolvable and yet they gave a solution.

      The title should read, "Overly pedantic man ensures self-inflicted torture while failing to find a single solution to a puzzle with multiple solutions"
  • He managed to produce multiple solutions for the puzzle, within the specified rules, but failed to work out that meant there were multiple possible solutions!

    I appreciate the publishing of a single answer to the puzzle in the paper wasn't helpful, but that should have been the clue to think about the wider problem a bit more.

    • by truedfx ( 802492 )
      There are always implied rules that are so widespread that they don't need to be stated, that unless any deviation from that rule is specified, that rule applies. For instance, if the solution involved interpreting the sums in base 13 without anything in the rules indicating so, that would obviously have been an error by the newspaper. I'm not too familiar in the Sudoku world but I can easily believe that "there is a single solution" is also so widespread that it doesn't need to be stated.
  • Basic algebra. 11 unknowns, 10 equations. That's going to be a parametric solution. You don't need a newspaper or a professor to tell you that the answer is not unique. How is this an amazing find?
  • ... is probably a hint on the fact that there are 10 equations and 12 variables :-)

  • "when the puzzle is syndicated newspapers are supposed to warn readers that there's multiple solutions"

    Really? Is that some sort of a known convention? And what does syndication have to do with it?

  • Mistakes are made all the time - you might not believe it, but newspapers rarely publish puzzles, even syndicated ones, without some editing beforehand. Often puzzles like Sudokus, crosswords, and such have to be re-drawn because they're not in a format the paper needs - often signified by textual elements being razor sharp while graphical elements are blurry or pixellated because the format wasn't camera ready, or the printing plate machine can't handle it or it needs reformatting, etc.

    And when that happen

  • Possible is in Impossible

There is no opinion so absurd that some philosopher will not express it. -- Marcus Tullius Cicero, "Ad familiares"

Working...