10 Wearable Habitats To Shelter You From the Apocalypse 135
fangmcgee writes "The end may not be nigh, but with vicious storms, severe flooding, and rising temperatures becoming the new normal, the apocalypse might be closer than we think. In the case of a cataclysmic event that could displace thousands, if not millions, of people, the availability of emergency shelter becomes a pressing concern. Here are 10 'wearable shelters' that serve as protective all-weather garments in the day and insulating dwellings at night."
Universal survival tool (Score:5, Funny)
All one needs is a towel.
Re:Universal survival tool (Score:4, Funny)
All one needs is a towel.
That isn't entirely correct. One of the big issues I have with Mr. Adams is that he totally ignored WD40 and Duct tape. I don't care if he thinks he knows the answer to everything, your travel bag is not complete without those two essentials.
Re:Universal survival tool (Score:5, Funny)
That may be true. However,
To summarize, if you know where you towel is, other people will lend you WD40, duct tape, cats and toast with butter. That should be enough for any apocalypse.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
For the most part a towel is more handy.
However if you go bare bones, I would suggest a good quality Pocket knife (no extra stuff just the knife).
A towel is a nice extra.
WD-40 for the wilderness isn't that much use, for the most part you will want more friction not less.
Duct tape, has a limited use time until your roll runs out. A knife you can use over and over again, sharpen it on a stone and keep going.
You can strip bark and make rope, which can allow you to tie the knife at the end of a stick to make a
Re: (Score:2)
Or simply cut yourself in it, lay down and die of thirst/starvation, if you're the average city dweller.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For the most part a towel is more handy.
Once a towel gets wet, it starts to smell funny. Apocalyptic survivors want to smell fresh and clean.
WD-40 for the wilderness isn't that much use, for the most part you will want more friction not less.
Speak for yourself, brother... You're forgetting the 1000s of other uses - fire starter, mosquito repellent, zombie repellant, bear repellant. The list goes on and on. Just because you're in the wilderness, doesn't mean that you can just ignore civilization.
Duct tape, has a limited use time until your roll runs out.
Again, such a failure of imagination. You can build a house, a dress, a condom (well, that might be a stretch). Fix a car / boat / airplane / bicyc
Re: (Score:1)
Spray WD-40 on your fishing lure. It's fish-oil based...
Re:Universal survival tool (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, how did he arrive at that number? Just sounds good? Maybe. The only significant 42 connected to our planet that I could find is the time [in minutes; and the number not exactly 42] needed to travel through Earth if there was a vacuum tube going through the center and you rely only on gravity to travel. Also, due to the nature of gravity any other tunnel that is not through the center will take the same travel time (again, not aided by any engine).
Re: (Score:1)
tie-wraps! (Score:1)
AND tie wraps - that's the trinity
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
You can't argue with biodiversity plummeting towards the zero axis.
But it's not actually plummeting towards the zero axis, let us note.
Nothing like this has ever happened before
You're making the fundamental error of assuming that geological era mass extinctions are measured in the same way that the current era's extinctions are. For example, the extinction that marks the end of the Cretaceous period killed 75% of all organisms that left fossils. It is worth noting here that the only large animals to survive were reptile scavengers like crocodiles. That is, if you were a large land animal of the Cretaceous and you
Re: (Score:2)
You can't save the biosphere by creating a few reserves.
But you can by creating a lot of reserves - which is what is happening.
You really need to get out of your basement and tread on soil some day.
I work and play in Yellowstone National Park. That and considerable surrounding national forests and some private reserves, occupies up to 80,000 sq km, depending how you define the "Greater Yellowstone" region (which includes considerable neighboring national forests and some private conservation efforts. That's crudely 1 part in 2000 of the total land area of the world (roughly 150 million sq km) just by itself.
Similarly, consider a
Re: (Score:2)
But it seems you still may not grasp that the places where biodiversity needs to survive and flourish are those where our food is grown and our fish are caught
I don't "grasp" it because such a claim doesn't make sense. A monoculture farm field is where we need "biodiversity"? The whole point of wild areas is to hold that biodiversity that won't ever be found on the farm. As I see it, 10-15% sounds adequate to me though it probably needs to be connected better.
A whole 1/3rd of the extra CO2 in the air is released by tilling
And stored by the resulting crops that grows afterward (including when the land is left fallow, a standard practice). There is a lot of seasonal variation in CO2 which doesn't contribute to cumulative CO2 gr
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Red Hot Chilli Peppers (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
WhatIGotYouGottaGetItPutItInYou...
That one?
Shelters for people who don't need shelter. (Score:2)
Homeless people get robbed if they have anything valuable or as useful as a sleeping bag.
(Also, the one in the main cover image (images 7/10/11 in the gallery) is clearly just taking the piss.)
Re: (Score:2)
"Homeless people get robbed if they have anything valuable or as useful as a sleeping bag."
The first tool to "wear" when you start moving away from a disaster is your legal concealed firearm (which you have PRACTICED with and are proficient in handling).
Bug out defense can be advanced:
One vet I know has a short-but-legal AR-15 with a folding buttstock (not retracting, folding) that fits nicely in a standard small backpack. Of course he has a pistol handy because CHUDs won't give you time to free your rifle,
Re: (Score:2)
The first tool to "wear" when you start moving away from a disaster is your legal concealed firearm (which you have PRACTICED with and are proficient in handling).
Way to rub it in, asshole. Some of us can't afford the luxury of residing in the bible belt, appalachia, or some other shithole where "legal concealed firearm" isn't an oxymoron. And I say this as an owner of several firearms, a few of which could be (and would be) carried concealed if the legal climate in the developed states wasn't so fucking unconstitutional.
because CHUDs
LOL.
Re: (Score:2)
The first tool to "wear" when you start moving away from a disaster is your legal concealed firearm (which you have PRACTICED with and are proficient in handling).
Way to rub it in, asshole. Some of us can't afford the luxury of residing in the bible belt, appalachia, or some other shithole where "legal concealed firearm" isn't an oxymoron. And I say this as an owner of several firearms, a few of which could be (and would be) carried concealed if the legal climate in the developed states wasn't so fucking unconstitutional.
because CHUDs
LOL.
Move? Or, stop voting for the idiots that don't let you carry? Carry anyway?
Re: (Score:1)
What states allow concealed-carry, but don't have conservative christians imposing, or trying to impose their superstitions on kids at school? Illinois is a possibility as long as you avoid southern Illinois, but I'd wait a couple of years to see of the new concealed carry laws hold up.
>Or, stop voting for the idiots that don't let you carry?
Not a bad plan, unless their opponents have larger issues, which is often the case.
>Carry anyway?
Really terrible idea, unless you're tryi
Re: (Score:2)
Moving costs money. Living somewhere that lacks tech jobs costs opportunity. Being surrounded by rednecks, hicks, and the Jesus fan club costs sanity.
Also, I don't see how not voting in elections would bring about legal concealed carry. In case that last sentence went over your head, I'm implying that the only ones on the ballot are the idiots that don't let you carry. Despite voting for write-ins for the last
Re: (Score:2)
Move? Perhaps I wasn't clear when I said "some of us can't afford the luxury of residing in..."
Oh, please. Don't couch this as a need, when it's clearly just the integrated outcome of your decisions to stay in (what I infer to be) "...god damn New Jersey".
I know for a fact that I would literally turn down $500k/year in salary if the job required me to live in NJ (or any of those other godforsaken liberal hellhole states). I would be much happier even if I could only make a tenth of that while living in relative freedom.
So, I believe that when you define moving to live in freedom as impossible, you mu
Re: (Score:2)
thank you for providing a perfect example that gun nuts are fucking stupid in a general sense as well as in the childish fantasy make-believe sense of "i need my gun to protect myself from da gubmint".
making $500K/year in a liberal western democracy isn't exactly an onerous hardship. you're not at risk of being dragged off to the gulags for
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
See, you completely misunderstood and decided to knee-jerk.
The reason I don't want to live in a liberal hell-hole is that it's populated with your ilk. It's not about gun rights; that is merely a bellwether that approximates to a first-order whether the culture of the area is rife with people who are constitutionally incapable of minding their own business.
By all means, please keep yourself and people like you away from the remaining nice places to live. Your kind flees what your policies have wrought, wher
Re: (Score:2)
Being surrounded by rednecks, hicks, and the Jesus fan club costs sanity.
Nothing like sheltered Yankees with no clue about life outside the beltway that they didn't learn from reruns of the Beverly Hillbillys. AMIRITE?
Re: (Score:3)
RTFA, most of these were intended for existing homeless people in cities, or for temporary mass refugees. Not paranoid survivalist teotwawki gun nuts who presumably can just buy a regular sleeping bag and/or bivy.
Re:Shelters for people who don't need shelter. (Score:4, Interesting)
Part of surviving something like that is too look like you have nothing. Someone with a ragged tarp looking backpack may be less of a target than someone toting a North Face backpack.
This guy http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz179/556mp/IMG_3213.jpg [photobucket.com] probably stands a better chance of not getting robbed as opposed to this guy http://attractions.uptake.com/blog/files/2009/06/camping-backpack.jpg [uptake.com] who you can clearly see has a nice toasty warm sleeping bag and even a foam sleeping pad.
Re: (Score:2)
The first tool to "wear" when you start moving away from a disaster is your legal concealed firearm (which you have PRACTICED with and are proficient in handling).
Illegal in many states, and illegal or effectively illegal in most states.
One vet I know has a short-but-legal AR-15 with a folding buttstock (not retracting, folding) that fits nicely in a standard small backpack.
Illegal virtually everywhere, if you actually carry it in the backpack anyway.
No need for anything special though. At least four pairs of good socks, broken-in hiking boots, and a poncho should do for temperate weather.
Emergency blankets and butane lighters, and a knife, in addition to your large environment-colored waterproof poncho. Exposure kills surprisingly many people.
Bivy Sacks... (Score:1)
Bivy sacks those are not.
I like turtles (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Are you a turtle?
YBYSAIA!
good to know (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Habitat =! habitation (Score:1)
Similar terms, but they do not mean the same thing.
-1 Annoying (Score:5, Informative)
Main reason I often don't read TFA? Because of trash sites like the one linked in TFS.
Anything where normal parts of the article are disguised as ads (or vice versa) is an immediate bounce for me. Present your content like a responsible adult and people might read.
Re: (Score:1)
Until you run out of Ammo. I'll stick with my sword, knife and crossbow.
Not impressed (Score:2)
Ok, I looked it over and am not impressed.
A hammock and a plastic tarp stuffed into a jacket pocket is not a bad solution.
Re:Not impressed (Score:4, Funny)
And none of these can be created with a 3D printer. What is wrong with these people?
Re: (Score:2)
gotta have the Sleep Suit (Score:2)
Nobody will know it's me falling asleep on my keyboard.
And this one comes complete with (Score:2)
And this one comes complete with a tin foil brain protection system, and the tin foil is completely inspectable and replaceable by you, the whackjob^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hintelligent purchaser of portable habitats.
Re: (Score:2)
Got a particularly good link?
Re: (Score:2)
Here is one source, [wattsupwiththat.com] and here is another. [theinconve...keptic.com]
Just two examples. It is pretty easy to google that, and the information is not somebody's "opinion", it is what the science says. BUT... while those particular sources are often attacked, keep in mind that they are presenting someone else's scientific studies, they are not "the source". You a
Re: (Score:2)
Have you checked the state of the biosphere recently?
He might or might not have done so. We can't tell from available evidence. However, we can determine from your baseless concerns that you haven't.
But we can't survive without the biosphere, and we're doing an excellent job of killing it off, very rapidly indeed.
I'm chilling in Yellowstone National Park as I type this. There's no evidence of biosphere killing going on here. So it can't be "very rapid".
Re: (Score:2)
It's no longer even just sad. It has gotten to the point it's almost amusing.
Re: (Score:2)
Total global cyclonic energy ("vicious storms") has been at a 40-year LOW. Yes, the Atlantic got some storms last year but they were only seemingly "more vicious" because they happened near cities. The overall rate of "vicious storms" is DOWN, not up.
Well, 40-year low is possibly a bit misleading if you intend to imply there's a downward trend. ACE varies pretty wildly from year to year, so it's extremely hard to say if there's a trend in one direction or the other. This is why most climate and atmospheric scientists are extremely reluctant to blame any one storm season on climate change, despite the media biting at the bullet to do so.
Though, what's interesting to me is how strong everyone predicted this season was going to be in the Atlantic and how
Re: (Score:2)
"Well, 40-year low is possibly a bit misleading if you intend to imply there's a downward trend. "
Well, first, I corrected this to 30 years. And second, I wasn't suggesting a downward trend, but a persistent dip in ACE for a number of years. It is my understanding that it has actually been up a bit, on average, over the last few years but that we are still at a relatively low spot in the long-term record.
Apocalypse? (Score:4, Funny)
Is anyone else sick of the Apocalypse mame. (Score:5, Insightful)
This Apocalypse stuff is really starting to annoy me. If civilization falls, it will be gradual. And we won't go back to the stone age.
Why because we know how to not live in the stone age.
We know about metals and melting ore to to create them. We know about magnets and how they can be used to generate electricity or using electricity to create maniacal energy. We understand that silicon has a semi-conductive state and how to arrange semi-conductors into not gates and not gates into And and Or gates and further on to a computer.
As a group of people we know a lot of stuff. and will not live like in a stone age. Short term we may be living in camps. But we would have a lot of things to help out.
Re:Is anyone else sick of the Apocalypse mame. (Score:4, Interesting)
This Apocalypse stuff is really starting to annoy me.
That I agree with, but remember, this is marketing hype. "Apocalypse" is trending pretty high right now, so it's one of the buzzwords that's en vogue. Next week it might be "Green," oh wait that was last week; thus is the mercurial nature of advertising.
Long story short, "Wearable Apocalypse Shelter" probably generates a lot more impressions than "Stupid Art Projects That Emulate Clothing"
If civilization falls, it will be gradual.
Depends on what causes the fall; an asteroid strike, fast-moving plague that wipes out 3/4 - 2/3 of the human populace, or all-out nuclear holocaust would tear down what humanity has built in a hurry. Hell, some anomalous event that completely wipes out all digitally-stored information, but doesn't touch infrastructure, would be pretty devastating to modern society.
We know about metals and melting ore to to create them. We know about magnets and how they can be used to generate electricity or using electricity to create maniacal energy. We understand that silicon has a semi-conductive state and how to arrange semi-conductors into not gates and not gates into And and Or gates and further on to a computer.
Collectively, perhaps that's true. And, presuming our civilization has a long fall that does not include destruction of knowledge (which, as any student of history can tell you, never happens; consider the Library of Alexandria, for example, which was believed to have contained the sum of human knowledge up to that point in history - burned by invading armies).
However, there are some issues. First, we should presume that any information that is stored in a purely digital format (i.e., no hard-copies, or so few hard-copies that spreading the knowledge across a vast geographic area quickly without electronic transmission would be nigh impossible) would be lost completely. Second, we should also consider that it's likely a majority of survivors would either A) not understand much of the material, and thus consider it to be more useful as fuel than as knowledge, or B) be too busy just staying alive to care how things like semi-conductors, which would not be essential to daily life, work. So, aside from the 0-day loss of all digital-only information, you'd also see a steady decrease in the amount of material available due to human nature (and, let's face it, general stupidity).
Plus, presuming the need to completely rebuild civilization from the ground up, computers are one of the last items to consider in terms of importance. So, while falling all the way back to the actual Stone Age is pretty unlikely, considering, it's not too far fetched to imagine the post-apocalyptic future as a modified reboot of the Iron Age.
Re: (Score:1)
http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~bowles/PopulationSize.pdf [santafe.edu]
If the population shrinks enough, ie massive plague or apocalyptic type stuff, technology will regress, even to a stone age like state.
Re: (Score:2)
A tiny fraction of the human population would recognize iron ore if it bit them on the ass. Fewer still have any idea how to turn it into steel.
Most people know that electricity exists, in about the same way they know men have walked on the moon. Ask them to make it happen, though, and they'll be dumbfounded. Maybe a not-tiny per
Re: (Score:2)
Goal 1. If i become a zombie, I wish to be patient zero. The Alpha Zombie if you will.
Goal 2. If not i intend to be immune. No not that loser Legend but a real one.
Turns out exposing myself to everything infectious is the way to go for both 1 and 2. Like a poor mans vaccination. And gives me a reason to call a lot of friends out on
BO vs. BHO (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Pointless story. (Score:4, Informative)
Why is this on Slashdot? (Score:4, Insightful)
It's not survival gear, it's silly jackoff "art" and it's not news for nerds and it doesn't fucking matter.
Want to survive? Arm your mind, arm yourself (with a legal concealed weapon) and have a serious bugout bag and serious clothing (including BROKEN IN combat or hiking boots).
Re: Why is this on Slashdot? (Score:2)
In the end of civilization as we know it you are really concerned for your concealed weapon to be legal?
Do you remember mars attack? Would you want to bet who do you remember me from that film?
By the way, good luck with your legal concealed weapon without ammunition (you didn't mentioned it, did you?)
Re: (Score:1)
In the end of civilization as we know it you are really concerned for your concealed weapon to be legal?
Because you want your weapon on hand and to do that means carrying it during non end of civilization times.
Re: (Score:1)
Want to survive? Arm your mind, arm yourself (with a legal concealed weapon) and have a serious bugout bag and serious clothing (including BROKEN IN combat or hiking boots).
If you are in a position to execute such a strategy you must have no children, no pets, no worthwhile romantic or platonic relationships etc.
I would rather live a fulfilling life now, while it is still possible, and accept my untimely demise with the comfort that I enjoyed life while it was enjoyable.
Not interested in scraping through some post-apocalyptic existence, which no matter your preparation, is sure to be short and thoroughly un-enjoyable.
Re: (Score:2)
Not interested in scraping through some post-apocalyptic existence, which no matter your preparation, is sure to be short and thoroughly un-enjoyable.
Just because you aren't, doesn't mean that everyone else shares your views. I must admit that I probably would find day to day life in such a world more fulfilling (where merely surviving helps future humanity in a big way).
Re: (Score:2)
I must admit that I probably would find day to day life in such a world more fulfilling (where merely surviving helps future humanity in a big way).
Well, it certainly lowers the bar for meaningful participation, doesn't it?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it certainly lowers the bar for meaningful participation, doesn't it?
That's probably a part of the reason that apocalypse and disaster movies do well. For example, consider the occasional internet discussion about what one would do in a zombie apocalypse. I doubt many people actually want such disasters to befall mankind, but they do like the clarity (and sure, lower standards for meaningful participation) that such situations give.
For example, the guy that is only good at killing zombies can be a valued, contributing member of society who saves humanity single-handedly r
Re: (Score:1)
Want to survive? Arm your mind, arm yourself (with a legal concealed weapon) and have a serious bugout bag and serious clothing (including BROKEN IN combat or hiking boots).
If you are in a position to execute such a strategy you must have no children, no pets, no worthwhile romantic or platonic relationships etc.
I would rather live a fulfilling life now, while it is still possible, and accept my untimely demise with the comfort that I enjoyed life while it was enjoyable.
Not interested in scraping through some post-apocalyptic existence, which no matter your preparation, is sure to be short and thoroughly un-enjoyable.
Ummm - This is slashdot. You've just described 90+% of the readership.
Re: (Score:2)
"If you are in a position to execute such a strategy you must have no children, no pets, no worthwhile romantic or platonic relationships etc."
My late wife was more than competent to "execute such a strategy" and my dogs are portable.
If you have dependants you'll may be forced to execute that strategy with them in tow! Gear is cheap enough and if you go camping now and then you'll get good fun out of it too. A side effect of going camping is you and yours can be comfortable in nature. It's peaceful and fun.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It's like all these people that get a concealed permit 'for protection', buy a handgun and it sits in the closet for 10 years and they're surprised when they don't know how to use the damned thing.
I'll be the envy of all... (Score:3, Funny)
... at the next Occupy Movement sit-in with my new Ecouterre wearable habitat!
News for nerds (Score:2)
They weren't all awful. (Score:1)
Apocalypse .. or light spring drizzle? (Score:3)
And lo, out of the four corners came a misting of water that fell on all the sons of Abraham.
And the iniquitous were chilled slightly by it, and proclaimed their shame...
The children of the lamb were sheltered by their light clothing.
Everyone PANIC! (Score:4, Informative)
In the case of a cataclysmic event that could displace thousands, if not millions, of people, the availability of emergency shelter becomes a pressing concern.
The things that will actually make a difference in your ability to survive a cataclysmic event have very little to do with simple products you can buy. Some things that will make a huge difference:
- How much warning you get: The more time you have, the more survivable the mess is.
- Your willingness to believe the warning: If you don't believe it (not uncommon at all), you won't react in time to do anything useful.
- Whether you have the resources to get to somewhere else in between the warning and the actual cataclysm: If you don't have anywhere to go, don't have a car, etc, then leaving is much more difficult.
- Your willingness to lose most of your stuff: Many people have died going for their valuables rather than going to a safer place.
- Whether you have any chronic medical conditions: A lot of deaths in disaster areas are people not getting the medication they need to treat chronic illness.
- Your age: Elderly and young children will get the worst of it.
- Your physical fitness: If you're hale and hardy, you can consider options like loading up everything you need in a backpack and walking out of the disaster area. If you're morbidly obese, you can't.
Basically, the standard strategy for dealing with a serious but localized disaster is (1) Try to get everyone out of there before it strikes. (2) After it strikes, bring as many supplies into the area as you can while getting as many people out of the area as you can as quickly as possible. (3) As the people are leaving, start fixing the underlying problems to the degree possible. (4) As the disaster area recovers, people start trickling back in.
I don't think that's going to work... (Score:3, Insightful)
I would envision something like a space suit, with chain mail over Kevlar to resist bladed weapon puctures and bullets. It would not need to be airtight, but would allow a slight overpressure for nuclear/biological/chemical survival, something like armored firefighter turnout gear with SCBA, with an armored helmet with facemask.
Accessorize with melee weapons and big guns...ouila! The fashion statement of the Apocalypse.
Re: (Score:1)
Amen, the photos had me in stitches that's for sure :D
That won't work either. (Score:4, Informative)
I would envision something like a space suit, with chain mail over Kevlar to resist bladed weapon puctures and bullets. It would not need to be airtight, but would allow a slight overpressure for nuclear/biological/chemical survival, something like armored firefighter turnout gear with SCBA, with an armored helmet with facemask.
Accessorize with melee weapons and big guns...ouila! The fashion statement of the Apocalypse.
Spoken like someone who has never hiked long distance. Weight is your enemy.
You are no better than the fashionista, proposing something so utterly impractical yet "cool" looking.
Re: (Score:2)
They just forgot to mention the baby tokamak power source, and the actuators... yep, they've been playin' too much Fallout, and they're planning for Powered Armor.
Problem with Powered Armor is maintaining a charge. You will never again think it's a cool idea for disaster relief, or even war, if you read Steakley's Armor.
Re: (Score:2)
just make powered armor that runs on biufuel, specifically the blubber of your 300+ lbs. fellow americans. 15kW (20 horsepower!) for 1,000 seconds on a pound of fat!
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting, so your Fallout character hasn't gotten Power Armor MK2 yet? Back in reality, this seems like something that would really slow you down when you're trying to vacate wh
BFD (Score:2)
storms? hot weather? (Score:2)
Neither of these are new. We've always had hurricanes and hot weather, going back before the industrial age..
Honey, take off your clothes, It's bedtime... (Score:2)
Rule 10: You take life too seriously.
Rule 6: Remember: You're not getting out of it alive.
Re: (Score:2)
I think we'll have to agree to disagree. It means what it means in the context it is used in.