Slashdot's Disagree Mail 167
This guy seems to be a little upset that the bottom has fallen out of the criminal mind-reading market. Luckily he seems to have made up for it by predicting earthquakes on the side.
On Mon Sep 8, 2003 ********* wrote:
"I am on two projects, actually the telepathy work went dormant when I found the demand sluggish although a trained reader might avoid some of what criminals want. Violence and sex can be read as images.Quake forecasts are useful to survive and this is where the activity is going in. Neither project is quite what other people are into as discussion. Indeed the tenor of both activities is observation observation observation. Mistakes in either area kill people. Warnings are of course not what people want. Quakes can be planned around. Finding oneself in an elevator with a serial killer might demand a skilled avoidance. There is a risk I will learn something else from a more informed person in your site. What a bore to load on more stuff people will want me to shut up about, but maybe sneaky tips to survive can help me to suffer longer."
This guy is part of your standard tinfoil-hat crowd. I appreciate that my response back is what will determine if free speech lives or dies.
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 ****** wrote:
"hi there Just trying to shed some light on your troubles with new laws. I believe thatALL governments have found a "legal" loophole to create new "laws" and that is making every person ie man woman and child a corporation or SLAVE. How can they do that ? by simply having you identify yourself willingly as such. Look at your issued drivers license and such if your name is all in CAPITALS you are no longer entitled to the human rights or even your inalienable rights ( God given rights )If you do not believe me check your birth certificate some may find their name in upper and lower(capital an small letters) if this is so then try to get your drivers license changed to your Proper name designating you a man ( free man ) or woman.Check the Magna Carta of 1215 these rights and priveledges are forever and if they have been removed then you cannot trust any other laws as these came straight from the King at that time and if he can lie to you what chance do you have of getting any support from anyone else? I believe we need laws and a way to enforce them but when human rights are being violated then Everyone has a voice and has to use it. He who does not stand up and fight for liberty and freedom deserves neither liberty or freedom. If no reply I will acceptall freedom is gone."
Finally we have this man, who shows us why you should never mix "The Matrix," a sociology book, and anti-psychotic medication.
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 ******* wrote:
"There is something extremely wrong with every single person in this world. They seem to be part of a pointless simulation.
"The Matrix" has portrayed this idea somewhat, yet we watch it and go back to our daily lives. Yet in this very life, underneath the seeming diversity in people's opinions, values, talents, and interests, there is something that makes everyone the same. It is as though this planet is populated only by mindless fakes, objects that provide the appearance of intellect on the surface but are based on only mechanical reflexes and primitive thought patterns.
I don't really care if anything I say has been said before, if it was portrayed in movies, in books, or in the lyrics of some useless song. With 6 billion people covering the globe at any given time, thousands and thousands of years of written literature, probability dictates almost any combination of words has occurred numerous times. Yet there is clear evidence there was no action, so those words, just like the people who spoke them, must have been just more fakes. I am forced to use this language (also created by the fakes) because there is no alternative, so everything I write here could be misunderstood to make me sound like one of them, but it will be the action that I take and the dedication that will separate me from them.
In my estimation the fakes that occupy this planet don't make up 99%, but more like 99.9999999% of the population. I know this because I've searched, and in my search have so far only found one true ally (I have found him via the internet as well). But even with those numbers we would not give up because there is no logic in giving up.
The people on this planet are all fakes because the societies have made them this way. Ideas that populate people's minds have no logic or purpose. Concepts such as religion, god, morality, individualism, freedom, identity, happiness, love and billions of others are all just memes. Like parasites they infect the minds and spread from one person to the next. They have no point or purpose; they exist without any logical basis or foundation. The fakes are completely controlled by them, and they will never see beyond them. To not be controlled by them one must do more then just realize that they exist. One must resist any ideas that have no point, endlessly question, and never accept imperfection or compromise in any answer.
We (myself and my ally) are different though. While we have had the limitation of existing only in these societies, something has made it possible for us to resist being indoctrinated into becoming one of those fakes. We have no arbitrary wants, needs, desires, or preferences.
If this world continues to exist the way it is then nothing in it will ever have a point. It will always be just a product of random evolution, one with no importance or relevance. The only logical goal is to dedicate our lives to increasing our numbers, those that aren't fakes, so that in thousands of years our numbers may be such that the fakes would no longer be a threat to progress.
Those that join us must see every other person occupying this planet as the enemy, and us as their only allies. Like us they must have dedication only to taking the most logical action, and to nothing else.
To tell you more about us, we've posted some personal information about ourselves on a website. You'll also find past responses to us on that webpage.
Obviously anyone reading this email is most likely just another fake. Do not simply reply to this email, if you do your message will almost certainly be ignored. If you do wish to communicate, first demonstrate your interest by taking the effort to find us online, one of the ways to do that is described below.
Use a major search engine to search for every combination of any two words from the list below. The order of the words shouldn't matter as long as you do not search for them in quotes. Also when you pick the right combination you shouldn't need to look at more then the first matches.
There is no trick to this and this isn't meant to be quick, it should, however, be fairly clear if/when you find the right site. The following search engines were verified by us, please use any of them as other search engines may simply not list us correctly: MSN, Lycos, InfoSeek, FastSearch, LookSmart, HotBot, InfoSpace, Ask.com, AllTheWeb, Teoma, WebCrawler, AltaVista.
perfect
theory
endless
eternal
desire
ambition
driving
perpetual
idea
logical
infinite
dream
final
best
escape
objective
thought
only
logic
clue
If this can't be solved, or if you never reach us, there should be no reason for you to give up as we will never give up and thus there will always be some way to find us."
Huh-whuh? (Score:5, Insightful)
After having read this particular disagree mail postings, I feel dumber, as if those particular mail messages has a magic spell of IQ Sucking attached to them. Must get...brain...out of here...
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Must get... idle...out of here...
Re:Huh-whuh? (Score:4, Insightful)
Call me optimistic but I just don't believe that people are this stupid. Close to it, but this is over the deep end stuff.
Re:Huh-whuh? (Score:5, Insightful)
So what you're saying is that the first guy, ranting about predictions, can actually predict stuff? Seeing as how his email, written in 2003, was written well before Idle was a section...
Re:Huh-whuh? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Score +5 Insightful?
Genius moderating! I'm laughing too much to say more.
Re: (Score:1)
"Ever get the impression that maybe people are submitting this mail so they might see it appear here on Friday?"
If they are they're extraordinarily foresighted to submit to a section that's six years in their future.
Re:Huh-whuh? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I have to agree. All three sound like they're mentally ill. Posts from the merely misguided are amusing, but these aren't. They're sad.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a few of these posts up right now and I think they're all taking this stuff way too seriously. While I am sitting here failing to put into words my rationalization, I keep coming back to a small subset of my friends who work professionally with the mentally disabled. They all make cracks about the oddities (in some cases very extreme oddities) of their clients when they're off the job. On the other hand, however, they take their work very seriously and having seen them at their job I have no doubt
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know. As long as said person isn't in the room, what's the harm in laughing at them?
Re: (Score:2)
Having spent years as a psychiatric social worker I agree that these all sound like the work of the mentally ill.
Knowing that makes a lot of the comments seem pretty mean spirited. But this section is for idiot submissions. It just turns out that those are coming from the commenters this week.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
We -- I -- those others -- do.
So did anyone find them?! (Score:2)
So did anyone find the non-fakes? ROFL, post link please if you did.
Re:So did anyone find them?! (Score:5, Informative)
Ooh, so If I found his real email address, does that mean I get to be in the cult?
http://www.kottke.org/plus/misc/ryanandjacob.txt [kottke.org]
Okay... (Score:5, Funny)
FWIW, every word on my NY license is in capitals - does that mean the entire state is enslaved (including the DMV itself)?
Re:Okay... (Score:5, Informative)
does that mean the entire state is enslaved (including the DMV itself)?
Yes.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like this guy isn't the only one with this theory [yahoo.com].
Re:spell my name in all caps (Score:1, Insightful)
Writing things in all capitol letters 1) force you to slow down when reading things, 2) make it harder to confuse certain letters (1, l and I, rn and m, etc), and 3) do not make you a slave. Well, I'm just guessing on that last one. Maybe my tinfoil hat is tarnished?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Silly. Everyone knows that caps lock is cruise control for "cool."
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure that statement was around a long time before 4chan. Just because they pick it up doesn't mean they invented it.
And aside from that, as is said in Enemy Mine [imdb.com], Truth is Truth.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This 'all in caps' theory is the opening pitch for a 'you don't have to pay any taxes!' scam. I had a good friend who was partially suckered into this, but I managed to talk him out of it before he'd committed more than a few hundred dollars to these crooks.
Re:Okay... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Also, if a stop sign has a white border around it you only have to slow down for it.
I can butter jam the concoction with
an amoeba while the doormat sings
root at the frog legs. Will you dance
in the morning under dark boulders?
hehe
Re:Okay... (Score:5, Funny)
Muhaha! Now you are all my slaves!
Re: (Score:2)
It's known as the "Flesh and Blood Defense." It's complete rubbish, but those who never graduated high school may find it realistic. Backstory [washingtonmonthly.com]
Re: (Score:1)
does that mean the entire state is enslaved (including the DMV itself)?
No, it just means that the CAPS lock key is broken
Re:Okay... (Score:4, Informative)
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/NamesInCaps.htm
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
It's because your license plate is SHOUTING AT YOU, DUMBASS.
Re: (Score:2)
The "Matrix" email (Score:5, Informative)
This guy got the same email as well. [elsewhere.org]
So did a bunch of other people. [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I'm thinking that there are these things called "bots" that send out what I like to call "SPAM" that was randomly generated, maybe in the hopes of confusing some email programs into allowing it through?
More seriously, you see these posts on here all the time, rambling on and on for WAY too long with links to all kinds of websites that 'prove' the comments are legit. I used to think it was someone with
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Its a spam, designed to get people to keyword-stuff specific search engines.
Re: (Score:2)
He's got a point somewhere in there... (Score:1, Funny)
a sorry sport (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:a sorry sport (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
They stopped being funny when I realized how fscked we are.
Re: (Score:2)
And we got the FOURTH idiot (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I must respecfully disagree here. If the maladjusted person was sitting at home talking to the microwave then there would be no opportunity to as you say 'make light' of their version of reality.
When they choose to share those versions of reality with others then they exercise that wonderful right of free speech and the responsibility to deal with what comes after.
It's the same situation as what you do behind closed doors and what you do in a public park. If it's out of the public eye then it's no one's b
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Maladjusted? I prefer to think of it as tradition. You should see the very first posts on slashdot. I'm user 3088, but number 1 holds the record and my admiration!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Frankly, I find it a bit discouraging that making light of maladjusted individuals seems to rank fairly high on so many people's list of acceptable pastimes. It's quite cruel. Of course, the irony is that those who laugh loudest are themselves quite maladjusted
So, you just took the time to compose a Slashdot post about how looking down at others is a sign of maladjustment, and you want to talk about irony? Please, do go on. I look forward to hearing why it's better to look down on others with a frown than with a smile.
Re: (Score:2)
It's actually quite straightforward. People don't choose to be mentally ill. People do choose to be malicious scumbags who amuse themselves and boost their feeble self-esteem by ridiculing the mentally ill. Thus the difference between ridiculing the former for one's pathetic fun and chastising the latter in defense of the former.
That said, given the number of people who simply can't grasp the c
Re:a sorry sport (Score:5, Insightful)
I was beginning to wonder what was wrong with me that I felt pretty uncomfortable reading publicly posted missives from people who appear to be seriously ill. I think Rob and company should rethink this feature. It's sick, and I'm not going to read it any more.
Re: (Score:1)
They talk about ignoring every unconscious standard regulations of the brain. They say they do not want to be part of evolution. That collides heavily with what is generally accepted by 'normal' people. Therefore it makes one 'sick'.
So basically they are doing what you'll probably want though: achieving real choice. Really making your own decisions, instead of letting 'hardwired by evolution' do it for you.
You may not want to accept it but Nature (as in the mag) had posted an article a while back that concl
Re: (Score:2)
Frankly, I find it a bit discouraging that making light of maladjusted individuals seems to rank fairly high on so many people's list of acceptable pastimes. It's quite cruel. Of course, the irony is that those who laugh loudest are themselves quite maladjusted, otherwise they'd know better.
So why doesn't being so harshly judgemental of people qualify?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Harshly judgemental?" Maybe you're just being defensive? It would be harshly judgemental if I said "you people are going to hell for this", or something like that.
You said they're maladjusted, cruel, and you're attempting to elevate yourself above them. You're also calling people maladjusted based on one email. Their behaviour may be maladjusted, but you are not qualified to say any more than that.
I guess I just feel sorry for people who end up being used as public examples of incompetence.
Their behaviour is what's being put up as a public example. If appears as though you are using that to judge their character. Ponder the significance of that.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes...
No. You're missing the biggest part -- the part that said, "Of course, I am not immune to it myself at times, and one might argue that it's often done in a sort of "whistling past the graveyard" manner, in which we deny our own insanity by identifying and poking fun at the insanity of others. I guess I just feel sorry for people who end up being used as public examples of incompetence. Unless perhaps they ar
Re: (Score:2)
No. You're missing the biggest part -- ...
Nah. You negated it by labelling people.
Sorry, but that is definitely you being defensive. Or perhaps you are just "misreading" me on purpose, hoping that I will sneer at you?
Nope. I explained already.
Either way, I think your need to reply to what I said in the way you did is what you might want to look at. :)
Maybe. Or maybe you're unable to see fault in yourself. Dare ya to try!
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, how childish. Also, you are projecting.
*Shrug* You're not fooling anybody by posting anonymously.
OP already admitted his own fault, it is you who are resisting objectivity.
You denied being judgemental though you clearly were.
Re: (Score:2)
If there were more than just the two of us involved in this conversation, that might be cause for worry. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Now who's projecting? ;)
Re: (Score:2)
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Re: (Score:2)
You have a rather bizarre definition of maladjusted. Humans banding together and disdaining those different from themselves is the natural order of things.
Your usage of "overwhelming" is a bit peculiar as well. I can't really understand what you are trying to convey with those sentences.
Anyway, I plan to disable the idle section in my preferences rather than come here to mock those that like the section.
Re: a sorry sport (Score:2)
Studying other people, their opinions, reactions and language is a basic part of human behavior, wouldn't you agree? The further from oneself the objects of the study are, the more interesting, and the Slashdot disagree mail senders are usually quite far indeed.
Of course there are people just making light of it as well, but even laughing is not necessarily a sign of not taking it seriously; i
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with this sentiment. There's no sport in making fun of people with mental illness. It's at the same level as mocking a kid with Downs' syndrome who can't do calculus. These people who write these crazy emails? They're not having a gag, they have something busted in their head. They honestly believe their bizarre nonsense, and it causes them (and those around them) a lot of anguish.
What's worst is that often these folks with schizophrenia started off as highly intelligent people. Schiz
Re: (Score:1)
The answers have been taken from us! (Score:1)
You know... (Score:5, Funny)
... I'm sure I saw a piece of wood that looked like the bottom of a barrel around here, but now there's just all these shavings.
This is what I'm talking about (Score:1)
On last Disagree Mail article I mentioned [slashdot.org] that the reason people didn't like Idle was probably because they were disappointed with the "out there" factor that one would expect from 10 years of running Slashdot.
Although they erode my faith in humanity a little bit, these are much better and actually made me laugh.
'Sure sounds like something an android would say (Score:1)
>>> we would not give up because there is no logic in giving up.
*Somebody* needs to take the Voight-Kampff test. 'Sure sounds like something an android would say!
(Sorry, just finished a short obsession with blade runner)
Re: (Score:1)
Then maybe this will make you laugh:
http://www.explosm.net/comics/1398/ [explosm.net]
Re: (Score:1)
OK, this is going too far. (Score:5, Insightful)
Previous installments of Disagree Mail actually were from people personally contacting Slashdot to complain, and some were quite funny.
These emails are just text used to get spam past Bayesian filters so that an image with the real message can get through. Yes, I realize that the spammers often forget the image, I guess those messages are just "will it bounce" probes.
Good job samzenpus for proving to the aforementioned spammers that not only is your email valid, but you read everything, even the obvious spams that aren't targeted directly at yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Andy Dodd's post was the funniest of the whole page!! I was thinking the same thing. Some of this sounds like it was ripped from an existential angst ridden teen's MySpace page.
Normal /. (Score:4, Informative)
These sound like normal slashdot posts to me. You can't really distinguish them from a typical thread.
That last one... (Score:4, Funny)
Uhm...wow. I think this is an attempt at some sort of BRAIN VIRUS...
Lewis Black says the reason we only use 6% of our brains is that the rest sits around waiting to figure out the meaning of stupid things people say. (He also says that figuring out these stupid things people say is what causes aneurysms...)
Yeah, now I can believe it. This is some sort of weaponized STUPID.
I imagine the trick was balancing the stupid so you read it all the way through...
Definately Not Quick (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe I'll write up a quick Perl script to get the 210 first results from one of those major search engines, and scan through to see...
Yeah, I just lost interest. Not worth it. I must be a fake.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
It's dated 2002 and has names.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I have no life...
http://web.archive.org/web/20020802035601/http://www.eternalambition.com/ [archive.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Logical Goal (Score:5, Insightful)
The only logical goal is to dedicate our lives to increasing our numbers, those that aren't fakes, so that in thousands of years our numbers may be such that the fakes would no longer be a threat to progress.
That doesn't make any sense. "Progress" is itself an arbitrary goal; there is no logical reason to pursue progress. Guess he's just another fake, after all.
What, no Google outrage this time around? (Score:1)
Hooray! (Score:3, Funny)
I'm so very happy
The day is Disagree Mail
Big fat mailman dance
With my Disagree Mail
All ugly no brain fool
Hate my Disagree Mail
I feed them to the cat
To get my Disagree Mail
Feed me - feed me more
I need Disagree Mail
Hovering in darkness
With my Disagree Mail
You Disagree - I kill you
For my Disagree Mail
Stupid no-sex nerds
Hate my Disagree Mail
So for true all love I have
Stay with Disagree Mail
Wait I do another week
For more Disagree Mail
Wait alone I will I will
For lovely Disagree Mail
Eternal Ambition... Old News... (Score:2, Informative)
@yg
Re: (Score:2)
I should have read all the posts first. I dug for a while and found your later link as I could no longer remember the name of the site. Ah well.
Can's enslave me! (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
DMV Noobs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Here, take your pick:
This is your CSS on drugs (Score:1, Offtopic)
This is not the reg - kill this (Score:2)
If I want to read trap, I can always go to the reg. I like slashdot because they enable me to discuss things with a relatively intelligent base. There are enough sites for me to have a laugh at idiots already, let's kill this stuff.
Actually, even these posts are too intelligent to be marked as truly idiotic. So there is even little fun for over the top antics.
Dang! (Score:1)
I want whatever drugs they are having! They seem pretty zippy!
I don't believe.. (Score:1)
Not for Slashdot... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Coded messages, perhaps? (Score:2)
Take the first one for example. The words and sentences kinda work together and kinda make coherent thoughts. But they could also be explained as obfuscation around a buried coded message.
Not that I can come up with a reason why those coded messages are being directed at you. I would think they would be posted publicly so that the recipient could find them (though that did happen in the end, did
All CAPS (Score:2)
linky (Score:1)
http://www.weeklyuniverse.com/2002/matrix.htm [weeklyuniverse.com]
This just in... (Score:2)
The "ally" that the author of the last e-mail mentioned was just discovered. It was an AI all along. (That's what you get for trusting someone you met on the internet.)
Turing isn't sure what to make of this... does it count if the judge was a crackpot?
Yawn (Score:2)
Still not funny or worth my time.
In turn, I will waste your time with this post, slashdot!
SHUT UP (Score:2)
Going to alter Rob's equation (Score:2)
You should never mix X + a sociology book + Y.
There, fixed it.
Making fun of the insane is not a moral wrong (Score:2)