Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Secretarial Mistake Costs Pepsi $1.26 Billion 11

9gezegen writes "Pepsi learned that if it wants to continue to 'Refresh Everything,' it needs an extra $1.26 billion. It looks like one of the secretaries forget to inform company lawyers about a trade secrets case in a Wisconsin state court. When nobody arrived to court, the judge gave $1.26 billion default judgement. According to Pepsi lawyers, they were not properly served because the secretary was 'so busy preparing for a board meeting.' One might imagine she was working on the refreshments. Perhaps Pepsi should learn more about the Spamhaus case."


This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Secretarial Mistake Costs Pepsi $1.26 Billion

Comments Filter:
  • It couldn't possibly be *management's* fault for creating a system in which a clerical error can result in a $billion-plus loss.
  • by nomadic ( 141991 )
    Default judgments are easy to get vacated.
  • Bad service? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Valdrax ( 32670 ) on Sunday November 01, 2009 @07:19PM (#29945328)

    Someone who is a lawyer correct me if I'm wrong, but this is a terrible argument. I mean, if the secretary is an agent of the company who is authorized to receive communications on the company's behalf, then wouldn't service to a secretary be good enough?

    • There is an overwhelming tendency for courts to set aside defaults in favor of deciding a case on its merits. Unless the defendant has actually decided not to present a defense, issuing a default judgment subverts the purpose of the justice system, and is an undesirable result. Default judgments are intended to allow worthy plaintiffs to recover when a defendant refuses to participate in the legal process. So, even if this service is likely technically proper, the court will use any possible excuse to ov
    • I've never tested the theory, but if a company actually has a proper legal dept, I'm fairly sure I can't just plop down a court summons on the secretary's desk in a nondescript envelope.

      The story is light on details though.

      Overall, is the idea of "let's sell bottled water" worth several billion. It hardly seems unique...

  • I don't believe this. Secretaries aren't the only source of information. The simply "shot the pianist" in order to cover up their incompetence. She should sue them for libel. Perhaps a $100 million lawsuit?

The number of computer scientists in a room is inversely proportional to the number of bugs in their code.