Driver Gets Stuck On Cruise Control 38
Benaiah writes "In something seemingly out of a Keanu Reeves movie, an Australian driver was unable to make his freeway exit when his car failed to slow down as he applied the brake. For those of you too lazy to RTFA he tried everything to stop the car including turning off the ignition but to no avail, the computer was in control. Police at one point escorted him down the wrong side of the road at 80km/h(50mp/h) until he eventually was able to stop it by repeatedly stepping on the brake pedal. Ford Australia spokeswoman Sinead McAlary said there has been a recall on that make of car but for a different reason."
Throw it in neutral and apply the hand break? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's called panic.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The article pretty clearly states he tried.
Re: (Score:2)
The newspaper and police are being charitable (Score:3, Informative)
NO, no it does not. Given that he tried other options, and he seems to have remained calm for at least the first few KM of the problem, he probably did. from comments in the article and below, it does seem that at least some modern automatics are completely fly by wire affairs.
The article said it was a 2002 Ford Explorer. They're not drive by wire. He could have shifted to neutral and there's pretty much no mechanical failure that can prevent that. If it were a manual transmission and it was stuck in gear (kind of an unlikely failure at the same time the brakes and throttle mysteriously fail) then he could have still disengaged the clutch by holding the clutch pedal down.
The are several controls that can be used to stop or at least prevent further acceleration: The ignition ke
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
He's just a crying retard.
TFA:
who recently arrived in Melbourne from Queensland,
I rest my case.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, it didn't say he tried dropping it into neutral. I'm not totally familiar with the Australian version of an '02 Explorer, but I doubt (based on the model year) that it had drive-by-wire. I also very much doubt that it did not have a direct mechanical connection between the shifter linkage and the transmission. Therefore, if that was the case, dropping into neutral would have saved him earlier.
BTW, he probably lost power assist to the brakes because if hte throttle was jammed open, there's no vaccuum a
Re: (Score:1)
It doesn't say "neutral", but I bet it's one he tried.
Re: (Score:2)
It's worse than that. Many of these cars are "fly by wire" now with no direct mechanical connection between the pedals, shifter, and the engine.
I suppose I would have tried the hand brake- but that could also be really just a signal to the computer to slow down.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Being a mechanical device, the hand brake is not "all or nothing". I drive at 50mph all the time with one hand and my handbrake is to my right between the seats.
It is scary that you don't have a failsafe. "Pull this red button to disconnect the wires from the engine" or something.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Wow even when it says "for those too lazy to RTFA" in the summary, people still ignore it.
He tried putting it in neutral. He tried turning the ignition off. He tried all manner of brake pumping. Pretty much, he tried everything that you could conceivably try.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sounds familiar... (Score:1)
Yet another case of Rise of the Machines (RotM)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/13/satanic_bmw/ [theregister.co.uk]
This could actually be true... (Score:3, Informative)
The parking brake, or the hand brake is not strong enough to brake a moving car, at least not at speeds above 30 kph. At 80 kph the hand brake is most likely to take considerable damage and/or premature wear and even further disable its operation when trying to use it at that speed.
When it comes to the brakes, cars have what is known as ABS. ABS is an electronically controlled braking system which neutralizes the braking force on the wheels that are starting to spin, when you hit the brakes hard or you hit them when the road is slippery. It is technically possible for the electronic control unit (ECU) to hang and force all brake calipers open no matter how strong pressure is applied on the brake pedal.
Even the automatic transmission gearbox is controlled electronically consisting of electronically controlled actuator valves that reroute hydraulic fluid in the box in order to switch operating mode of the gearbox. It is fully possible for the ECU of the automatic transmission to stop responding to "shifting commands" from the shift stick.
Usually there is redundancy in those systems and the systems at least used to be isolated from each other, i.e. they operate independently from each other using their own circuitry and wiring except for perhaps the diagnostics interface (OBD, OBDII, et al). The ABS-system used to be this way on most cars until the TRACS feature came where the ABS system sends commands to the fuel injection box forcing the engine to rev down in order to prevent spin when accelerating. This is also used to enhance the effect of the ABS control when braking.
But my bets are, since the invention of the CCAM bus that all electronic components have become more and more integrated into each other and the manufacturers do what they can to cut their production costs and save copper wire by letting all components communicate over the same CCAM bus which goes around the car in a loop. If this bus breaks, gets congested or overloaded then things don't look good for the driver.
So, all in all, I think this is possible to happen and the cruise control may have overloaded the CCAM bus disabling all electronically controlled operation of the vehicle.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
All of the cars I've been working with (during my leisure time) is from before the era when the car manufacturers started using the CCAN bus. It's near impossible to find useful information about it on the internet, but I've managed to come over some brief but technical articles from an automotive engineerin
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I wondered about pulling fuses. Probably a dangerous thing to try while in motion because you would have to feel for the fuse box and then pull stuff at random.
Ford got tired of making cars (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Speed movie in Australia? (Score:1)
Just a point of detail but ... (Score:2, Informative)
Just a point of detail but ... (Score:2)
...you clearly didn’t read TFA either.
Re: (Score:1)
So why didn't he just do that to begin with?
I call bullshit (Score:1)
First, turning off the ignition switch physically opens the circuit between the car's electrical system and fuel/ignition systems. This would have either deprived the engine of fuel by cutting off the fuel pump or of spark by disabling the ignition system. Either way, the car stops.
Second, I don't see why he couldn't have thrown it into a lower gear to slow down or into neutral or even park to stop. American carmakers aren't known for their technological innovations at the best of times. SUVs are their
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Australia (Score:2)
Aha. Australia is in the SOUTHERN hemisphere. Everyone knows water goes down the toilet backwards there. I'm going to assume that you need to press the break to speed up and use the cruise control to slow down. Maybe he just forgot about that.
Attention Whore (Score:2, Funny)
I call bullshit on all "out of control and I can't stop" cars out there.
Turn off the ignition. Put it in neutral. And if you can't manage that, then first we cut off your head, then we execute you in the name of mankind. You are too stupid to risk having your genes perpetuated.
In Arizona about a decade ago a brainless cunt did this stunt in her Hyundai not once, but twice. The mechanics said it wasn't her car, so the police got suspicious. She was convicted of something, probably of extreme cuntery and enda