A Twinkie Deconstructed - Slashdot

Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's now on IFTTT. Check it out! Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

A Twinkie Deconstructed 2

Posted by samzenpus on Saturday September 11, 2010 @01:59PM from the art-meets-junk-food dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Dwight Eschliman, a San Francisco dad and internationally recognized photographer, wanted to answer the question, 'what's in a Twinkie?' So he took one of America's favorite foods — the Twinkie — and deconstructed it by purchasing each of the 37 ingredients and then photographing them."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Twinkie Deconstructed

Load All Comments

Search 2 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

The bright lights of stardom (Score:1)

by BraksDad ( 963908 ) writes:

Twinkie, Twinkie, little star. Do we really want to know what is in them? I have Pink Snowballs and Peeps available for snacking. I know they are not good for me so I eat them sparingly, but overall I do enjoy them blissfully ignorant of their content.
the citrus lens loves twinkies (Score:1)

by the citrus lens ( 1905700 ) writes:

posting my first comment in this new world called slashdot, happy to find a twinkie article to satisfy my hunger!

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

406 commentsHow A Professional Poker Player Conned a Casino Out of $9.6 Million
314 comments'Longest Living Human' Says He Is Ready For Death At 145
253 commentsMuseum of Failure Opens In Sweden
195 commentsTerrifying Anti-Riot Vehicle Created To Quash Any Urban Disturbance
147 commentsHundreds of Stonehenge-Like Monuments Found In The Amazon Rainforest

"If the code and the comments disagree, then both are probably wrong." -- Norm Schryer